Compare StocksANET vs INTC

Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
$172.70
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61

Rewards

ANET
  • Arista Networks, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 64.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Arista Networks, Inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
INTC

    Risks

    ANET
    • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • Trailing P/E of 62.8x is 59% above the historical average of 39.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • PEG ratio of 3.29 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ANET
    INTC
    Valuation
    $3.39B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    1.56%
    FCF Yield
    -1.66%
    62.80
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    40.06
    Forward P/E
    66.78
    Quality & Moat
    23.72%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    28.40%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    64.06%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    3.29
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.01
    Debt / Equity
    0.36
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -2.71
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    ANET: 8Ties: 1INTC: 1
    ANETINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ANET

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ANET
    $15.08
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $8.45B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$127.40B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ANET
    21.6% Overvalued
    Price is 21.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $172.70
    Fair Value: $142.08
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ANET

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $173?

    +22.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +22.9%

    The market implies +22.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +22.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ANET
    93/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ANET
    -2.10
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ANET
    Insiders 17.3%Institutions 70.9%Retail & Other 11.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,777
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ANET
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ANET
    6
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $25.36M
    WASSENAAR YVONNE
    Director
    $213,533
    @ $153.07 · 2026-04-15
    BREITHAUPT CHANTELLE YVETTE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $155.02 · 2026-04-14
    ULLAL JAYSHREE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.93M
    @ $150.11 · 2026-04-13
    WASSENAAR YVONNE
    Director
    $187,404
    @ $134.34 · 2026-03-16
    WASSENAAR YVONNE
    Director
    $240,380
    @ $132.44 · 2026-02-25
    BATTLES KELLY BODNAR
    Director
    $54,042
    @ $128.06 · 2026-02-23
    ULLAL JAYSHREE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.99M
    @ $124.55 · 2025-11-25
    BATTLES KELLY BODNAR
    Director
    $49,436
    @ $117.15 · 2025-11-21
    ULLAL JAYSHREE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.19M
    @ $132.77 · 2025-08-25
    BATTLES KELLY BODNAR
    Director
    $99,081
    @ $114.68 · 2025-07-25
    WASSENAAR YVONNE
    Director
    $15,826
    @ $94.20 · 2025-05-21
    BATTLES KELLY BODNAR
    Director
    $102,180
    @ $68.49 · 2025-04-22
    TAXAY MARC
    General Counsel
    $4.59M
    @ $88.59 · 2025-03-03
    ULLAL JAYSHREE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $12.99M
    @ $93.88 · 2025-02-24
    WASSENAAR YVONNE
    Director
    $17,233
    @ $102.58 · 2025-02-21
    MCCOOL JOHN F.
    Officer
    $11,436
    @ $102.11 · 2025-02-19
    BATTLES KELLY BODNAR
    Director
    $159,409
    @ $107.13 · 2025-02-14
    WASSENAAR YVONNE
    Director
    $20,331
    @ $121.02 · 2025-01-21
    TAXAY MARC
    General Counsel
    $4.36M
    @ $1640.40 · 2024-12-02
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ANET
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(66/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ANET
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    View ANET Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    ANET vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io