Compare Stocks › ANET vs BAC

Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-02, ANET is fairly valued at $169, with a DCF intrinsic value of $189 and a margin of safety of 10%. BAC is undervalued at $50, with an intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
$168.86
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01

Rewards

ANET
  • ★Gross margin of 63.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Arista Networks, Inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 111.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

ANET
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 1.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 53.3x is 35% above the historical average of 39.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ANET
BAC
Valuation
$3.89B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
1.83%
FCF Yield
N/A
53.27
Trailing P/E
11.94
32.33
Forward P/E
9.64
Quality & Moat
N/A
ROIC
3.80%
31.48%
ROE
10.73%
63.00%
Gross Margin
0.00%
1.25
PEG Ratio
0.91
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
No debt
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.88
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.56%
ANET: 2BAC: 4
ANETBAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ANET

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ANET
$15.08
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$8.45B
Δ Market Cap
+$127.40B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ANET
10.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 10.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $168.86
Fair Value: $188.61
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BAC
72.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $50.01
Fair Value: $180.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ANET

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $169?

+22.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.6%

The market implies +22.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ANET
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ANET
-2.10
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ANET
Insiders 17.2%Institutions 73.4%Retail & Other 9.3%
No. of Institutional Holders3,198
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BAC
Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,517
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ANET
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ANET
6
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $69.03M
BREITHAUPT CHANTELLE YVETTE
Chief Financial Officer
$263,160
@ $215.00 · 2026-10-06
TEMPLETON MARK B
Director
$1.02M
@ $204.37 · 2026-10-01
TEMPLETON MARK B
Director
$985,788
@ $197.16 · 2026-09-08
BREITHAUPT CHANTELLE YVETTE
Chief Financial Officer
$119,811
@ $195.77 · 2026-09-01
ULLAL JAYSHREE
Chief Executive Officer
$2.65M
@ $191.79 · 2026-08-25
BATTLES KELLY BODNAR
Director
$79,057
@ $187.34 · 2026-08-21
BECHTOLSHEIM ANDREAS V
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$39.14M
@ $163.06 · 2026-06-04
BREITHAUPT CHANTELLE YVETTE
Chief Financial Officer
$384,336
@ $157.00 · 2026-05-26
ULLAL JAYSHREE
Chief Executive Officer
$2.14M
@ $155.04 · 2026-05-26
BATTLES KELLY BODNAR
Director
$61,797
@ $146.44 · 2026-05-21
WASSENAAR YVONNE
Director
$136,846
@ $140.93 · 2026-05-20
WASSENAAR YVONNE
Director
$213,533
@ $153.07 · 2026-04-15
BREITHAUPT CHANTELLE YVETTE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.38M
@ $155.02 · 2026-04-14
ULLAL JAYSHREE
Chief Executive Officer
$16.93M
@ $150.11 · 2026-04-13
WASSENAAR YVONNE
Director
$187,404
@ $134.34 · 2026-03-16
WASSENAAR YVONNE
Director
$240,380
@ $132.44 · 2026-02-25
BATTLES KELLY BODNAR
Director
$54,042
@ $128.06 · 2026-02-23
ULLAL JAYSHREE
Chief Executive Officer
$2.99M
@ $124.55 · 2025-11-25
BATTLES KELLY BODNAR
Director
$49,436
@ $117.15 · 2025-11-21
ULLAL JAYSHREE
Chief Executive Officer
$3.19M
@ $132.77 · 2025-08-25
BATTLES KELLY BODNAR
Director
$99,081
@ $114.68 · 2025-07-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ANET
FearGreed
😐Neutral(41/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BAC
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ANET
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
BAC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
View ANET Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ANET vs BAC

Is Arista Networks, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to ANET's 10.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $189 vs. $169).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Arista Networks, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?▼

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while ANET scores 93/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ANET scores 16.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.