Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) vs Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
As of 2026-11-01, AMZN is overvalued at $240, with a DCF intrinsic value of $95 and a margin of safety of -152%. OXY is fairly valued at $64, with an intrinsic value of $80 and a margin of safety of 20%. Of the two, OXY has the wider margin of safety.
Rewards
- ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.34 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
- ★Trailing P/E of 19.4x is 52% below the historical average of 40.6x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
- ★Altman Z-Score of 5.30 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
- ★Gross margin of 73.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
- ★PEG ratio of 0.96 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
Risks
- ⚠9 insider sales totaling $18.3M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
- ⚠ROIC has declined by 21.2 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
- ⚠Occidental Petroleum Corporation scores only 14/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
- ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 2 out of 3 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $64?
Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.
No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →M-Score Trend
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
Frequently Asked Questions: AMZN vs OXY
Is Amazon.com, Inc. or Occidental Petroleum Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼
Based on our discounted cash flow model, OXY trades at a 19.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $80 vs. price $64), compared to AMZN's -152.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $95 vs. $240).
Which stock has a wider economic moat, Amazon.com, Inc. or Occidental Petroleum Corporation?▼
AMZN scores 51/100 (Narrow moat), while OXY scores 14/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.
Is Occidental Petroleum Corporation in financial distress?▼
OXY's Altman Z-Score of 1.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AMZN scores 5.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.
Which company has better free cash flow, Amazon.com, Inc. or Occidental Petroleum Corporation?▼
Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) generates a 5.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Amazon.com, Inc.'s -0.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.
Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Amazon.com, Inc. or Occidental Petroleum Corporation?▼
OXY earns 15.1% ROIC versus AMZN's 9.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.