Compare StocksAMP vs CRM

Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (AMP) vs Salesforce, Inc. (CRM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, AMP is undervalued at $467, with a DCF intrinsic value of $916 and a margin of safety of 49%. CRM is undervalued at $152, with an intrinsic value of $271 and a margin of safety of 44%. Of the two, AMP has the wider margin of safety.

AMP
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
$467.43
VS
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$151.78

Rewards

AMP
  • Ameriprise Financial, Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 24.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

AMP
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.45 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
CRM

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AMP
    CRM
    Valuation
    $8.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    $16.55B
    19.42%
    FCF Yield
    13.32%
    11.64
    Trailing P/E
    17.57
    9.80
    Forward P/E
    9.80
    Quality & Moat
    58.47%
    ROIC
    9.61%
    66.94%
    ROE
    16.91%
    56.60%
    Gross Margin
    77.64%
    1.57
    PEG Ratio
    0.72
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.90
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.38
    1.45%
    Dividend Yield
    1.16%
    AMP: 6Ties: 2CRM: 3
    AMPCRM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AMP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AMP
    $1.53
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $7.80B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$11.97B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    CRM
    $-7.99
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-117.14B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AMP
    48.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 48.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $467.43
    Fair Value: $915.61
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    CRM
    43.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 43.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $151.78
    Fair Value: $270.69
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AMP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $467?

    -1.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -13.7%

    The market implies -1.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -13.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $152?

    +3.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -2.8%

    The market implies +3.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AMP
    99/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AMP
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AMP
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 92.2%Retail & Other 7.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,851
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    CRM
    Insiders 3.0%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 2.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,721
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AMP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    CRM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $27.38M
    ALBER LAURA
    Director
    $500,266
    @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,178
    @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $865,827
    @ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AMP
    1
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $36.66M
    SMYTH GERARD P
    Officer
    $2.96M
    @ $472.52 · 2026-05-14
    ALVERO GUMER
    Officer
    $2.53M
    @ $542.88 · 2026-02-09
    BERMAN WALTER STANLEY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.81M
    @ $544.22 · 2026-02-05
    CRACCHIOLO JAMES M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $26.60M
    @ $544.96 · 2026-02-04
    MELLOH HEATHER J.
    General Counsel
    $768,502
    @ $512.33 · 2025-09-04
    SWEENEY JOSEPH EDWARD
    Officer
    $2.50M
    @ $539.07 · 2025-02-19
    BERMAN WALTER STANLEY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.39M
    @ $548.94 · 2025-02-18
    CRACCHIOLO JAMES M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.87M
    @ $563.44 · 2024-11-11
    BERMAN WALTER STANLEY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.88M
    @ $564.16 · 2024-11-11
    SWEENEY JOSEPH EDWARD
    Officer
    $5.90M
    @ $549.68 · 2024-11-08
    BROCKMAN DAWN M
    Officer
    $196,042
    @ $560.12 · 2024-11-06
    ALVERO GUMER
    Officer
    $1.20M
    @ $516.05 · 2024-10-31
    DAVIES WILLIAM
    Officer
    $3.85M
    @ $442.07 · 2024-08-30
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    CRM
    0
    Sells (3M)
    15
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $40.30M
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $552,798
    @ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $545,384
    @ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AMP
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    CRM
    FearGreed
    🥶Extreme Fear(18/100)

    "Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AMP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    CRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (18)
    View AMP Full AnalysisView CRM Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: AMP vs CRM

    Is Ameriprise Financial, Inc. or Salesforce, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, AMP trades at a 48.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $916 vs. price $467), compared to CRM's 43.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $271 vs. $152).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Ameriprise Financial, Inc. or Salesforce, Inc.?

    AMP scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Ameriprise Financial, Inc. in financial distress?

    AMP's Altman Z-Score of 0.5 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CRM scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Ameriprise Financial, Inc. or Salesforce, Inc.?

    Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (AMP) generates a 19.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Salesforce, Inc.'s 13.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Ameriprise Financial, Inc. or Salesforce, Inc.?

    AMP earns 58.5% ROIC versus CRM's 9.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Ameriprise Financial, Inc.'s or Salesforce, Inc.'s?

    AMP's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to CRM's 88/100 (Very Safe). AMP has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.