Compare StocksAMGN vs BAC

Amgen Inc. (AMGN) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, AMGN is overvalued at $338, with a DCF intrinsic value of $286 and a margin of safety of -18%. BAC is undervalued at $56, with an intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

AMGN
Amgen Inc.
$337.60
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20

Rewards

AMGN
  • Gross margin of 71.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Amgen Inc. scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

AMGN
  • ROIC has declined by 7.7 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 2.23 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • High leverage (4.93x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AMGN
BAC
Valuation
$7.44B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
4.08%
FCF Yield
N/A
23.48
Trailing P/E
13.95
14.38
Forward P/E
11.13
Quality & Moat
14.94%
ROIC
3.89%
101.32%
ROE
10.64%
71.44%
Gross Margin
0.00%
2.23
PEG Ratio
1.00
Balance Sheet Safety
4.93
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.68
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
2.99%
Dividend Yield
1.99%
AMGN: 4Ties: 1BAC: 3
AMGNBAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AMGN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AMGN
$9.01
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.01B
Δ Market Cap
+$36.10B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AMGN
17.9% Overvalued
Price is 17.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $337.60
Fair Value: $286.28
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AMGN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $338?

+8.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.5%

The market implies +8.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AMGN
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AMGN
-2.24
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AMGN
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 85.2%Retail & Other 14.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,959
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AMGN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AMGN
1
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $25.60M
GRYGIEL NANCY A
Officer
$400,451
@ $323.73 · 2026-05-04
SANTOS ESTEBAN
Officer
$20.77M
@ $379.12 · 2026-02-26
BUSCH MATTHEW C.
Officer
$375,790
@ $375.79 · 2026-02-19
GRYGIEL NANCY A
Officer
$1.06M
@ $337.26 · 2025-11-20
GORDON MURDO
Officer
$2.32M
@ $336.83 · 2025-11-12
KHOSLA RACHNA
Officer
$299,256
@ $336.24 · 2025-11-12
GRYGIEL NANCY A
Officer
$376,280
@ $296.99 · 2025-08-20
KHOSLA RACHNA
Officer
$434,520
@ $289.68 · 2025-06-05
BUSCH MATTHEW C.
Officer
$279,690
@ $279.69 · 2025-05-02
REESE DAVID M.
Chief Technology Officer
$10.23M
@ $301.56 · 2025-02-21
SANTOS ESTEBAN
Officer
$2.55M
@ $292.84 · 2025-02-19
MILLER DEREK
Officer
$593,934
@ $293.45 · 2025-02-19
GORDON MURDO
Officer
$2.59M
@ $294.79 · 2025-02-11
GRAHAM JONATHAN P
General Counsel
$7.34M
@ $293.12 · 2025-02-07
GRYGIEL NANCY A
Officer
$483,808
@ $304.47 · 2025-02-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AMGN
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AMGN
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
View AMGN Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AMGN vs BAC

Is Amgen Inc. or Bank of America Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to AMGN's -17.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $286 vs. $338).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Amgen Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while AMGN scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AMGN scores 1.7 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Amgen Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?

AMGN earns 14.9% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Amgen Inc.'s or Bank of America Corporation's?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to AMGN's 69/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.