Compare StocksAME vs BAC

AMETEK, Inc. (AME) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, AME is overvalued at $237, with a DCF intrinsic value of $163 and a margin of safety of -46%. BAC is undervalued at $56, with an intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

AME
AMETEK, Inc.
$237.42
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20

Rewards

AME
  • AMETEK, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • AMETEK, Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

AME
  • FCF yield of 2.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • PEG ratio of 3.00 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AME
BAC
Valuation
$1.39B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
2.55%
FCF Yield
N/A
35.92
Trailing P/E
13.95
26.94
Forward P/E
11.13
Quality & Moat
11.80%
ROIC
3.89%
14.63%
ROE
10.64%
36.68%
Gross Margin
0.00%
3.00
PEG Ratio
1.02
Balance Sheet Safety
0.18
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.82
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.59%
Dividend Yield
1.97%
AME: 3Ties: 1BAC: 4
AMEBAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AME

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AME
$4.38
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.39B
Δ Market Cap
+$14.88B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AME
45.9% Overvalued
Price is 45.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $237.42
Fair Value: $162.78
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AME

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $237?

+14.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +17.4%

The market implies +14.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +17.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AME
94/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AME
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AME
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 92.4%Retail & Other 7.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,605
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AME
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AME
1
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $28.88M
AMATO THOMAS A
Director
$114,893
@ $216.78 · 2026-03-24
MONTGOMERY THOMAS M.
Officer
$1.31M
@ $205.05 · 2025-12-22
MARECIC THOMAS C
Officer
$2.89M
@ $202.11 · 2025-12-15
ZAPICO NIMCRUT DAVID A.
Chief Executive Officer
$17.28M
@ $196.39 · 2025-11-25
SPERANZA EMANUELA
Officer
$540,000
@ $200.00 · 2025-11-12
OSCHER RONALD J
Officer
$5.26M
@ $200.05 · 2025-10-31
HARDIN JOHN WESLEY
Officer
$1.48M
@ $188.03 · 2025-09-11
AMATO THOMAS A
Director
$125,414
@ $176.64 · 2025-03-27
KOHLHAGEN STEVEN W
Director
$250,028
@ $189.42 · 2025-03-03
SPERANZA EMANUELA
Officer
$1.32M
@ $195.90 · 2024-11-26
ZAPICO NIMCRUT DAVID A.
Chief Executive Officer
$23.89M
@ $196.85 · 2024-11-26
CIAMPITTI TONY J.
Officer
$3.19M
@ $197.01 · 2024-11-22
HARDIN JOHN WESLEY
Officer
$3.82M
@ $196.23 · 2024-11-13
HERMANCE DAVID F.
Officer
$1.19M
@ $190.99 · 2024-11-08
KOHLHAGEN STEVEN W
Director
$250,526
@ $171.59 · 2024-09-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AME
FearGreed
😏Greed(69/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AME
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
View AME Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AME vs BAC

Is AMETEK, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to AME's -45.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $163 vs. $237).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, AMETEK, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while AME scores 94/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AME scores 7.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, AMETEK, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?

AME earns 11.8% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, AMETEK, Inc.'s or Bank of America Corporation's?

AME's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). AME has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.