Compare StocksAMD vs UHS

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, AMD is undervalued at $476, with a DCF intrinsic value of $357902777187 and a margin of safety of 100%. UHS is undervalued at $168, with an intrinsic value of $426 and a margin of safety of 60%. Of the two, AMD has the wider margin of safety.

AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$476.15
VS
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$168.44

Rewards

AMD
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 29.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.01 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
UHS
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 46.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 14% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.83 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

AMD
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.00 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $144.5M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
UHS

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AMD
    UHS
    Valuation
    $7.17B
    Free Cash Flow
    $824.55M
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    8.09%
    158.72
    Trailing P/E
    6.87
    34.33
    Forward P/E
    6.96
    Quality & Moat
    6.23%
    ROIC
    12.34%
    8.06%
    ROE
    20.95%
    53.06%
    Gross Margin
    44.61%
    1.12
    PEG Ratio
    1.20
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.67
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -1.14
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.90
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    0.47%
    AMD: 5Ties: 1UHS: 5
    AMDUHS

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AMD

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    UHS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AMD
    $0.00
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $6.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$149.39
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    UHS
    $1.05
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $3.19B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$3.36B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AMD
    100.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $476.15
    Fair Value: $491923763775.66
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    UHS
    60.4% Margin of Safety
    Price is 60.4% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $168.44
    Fair Value: $425.70
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AMD

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $476?

    -30.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -30.0%

    The market implies -30.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    UHS

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $168?

    -1.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +6.7%

    The market implies -1.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +6.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AMD
    41/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    UHS
    66/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AMD
    -2.84
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    UHS
    -2.44
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AMD
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 72.0%Retail & Other 27.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,601
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    UHS
    Insiders 4.8%Institutions 100.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders872
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AMD
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    GUIDO PHILIP
    Officer
    $999,328
    @ $113.56 · 2025-05-20
    GUIDO PHILIP
    Officer
    $499,616
    @ $107.56 · 2025-02-07
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    UHS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AMD
    7
    Sells (3M)
    32
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $312.48M
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $3.34M
    @ $556.43 · 2026-07-15
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $3.22M
    @ $536.33 · 2026-06-15
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $57.59M
    @ $460.69 · 2026-06-10
    DENZEL NORA M
    Director
    $5.45M
    @ $522.00 · 2026-06-02
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $8.41M
    @ $431.40 · 2026-05-20
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $55.69M
    @ $445.51 · 2026-05-13
    GRASBY PAUL DARREN
    Officer
    $10.83M
    @ $444.39 · 2026-05-08
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $10.96M
    @ $350.00 · 2026-04-24
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $8.99M
    @ $271.47 · 2026-04-16
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $740,925
    @ $225.00 · 2026-04-06
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.90M
    @ $198.77 · 2026-03-12
    GRASBY PAUL DARREN
    Officer
    $1.54M
    @ $204.87 · 2026-03-11
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $606,800
    @ $200.00 · 2026-03-04
    HAHN AVA M
    General Counsel
    $56,814
    @ $198.65 · 2026-02-18
    HU JEAN X
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.02M
    @ $201.62 · 2026-02-17
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $26.79M
    @ $214.36 · 2026-02-11
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $4.22M
    @ $216.81 · 2026-02-11
    HAHN AVA M
    General Counsel
    $572,454
    @ $234.42 · 2026-01-16
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $26.89M
    @ $215.14 · 2025-12-11
    GRASBY PAUL DARREN
    Officer
    $2.19M
    @ $218.77 · 2025-12-04
    HU JEAN X
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.05M
    @ $209.96 · 2025-11-24
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $4.46M
    @ $229.37 · 2025-11-19
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $4.11M
    @ $240.12 · 2025-11-14
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $3.77M
    @ $224.28 · 2025-10-15
    HAHN AVA M
    General Counsel
    $648,197
    @ $226.01 · 2025-10-06
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $371,272
    @ $165.01 · 2025-09-24
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.67M
    @ $159.20 · 2025-09-15
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $2.77M
    @ $160.93 · 2025-09-10
    HAHN AVA M
    General Counsel
    $22,608
    @ $158.10 · 2025-09-02
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $36.89M
    @ $163.97 · 2025-08-21
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.99M
    @ $178.11 · 2025-08-15
    GRASBY PAUL DARREN
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $173.21 · 2025-08-12
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.79M
    @ $155.03 · 2025-07-15
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $116.00 · 2025-06-13
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.04M
    @ $116.59 · 2025-05-15
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.67M
    @ $95.47 · 2025-04-15
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.75M
    @ $100.27 · 2025-03-14
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.99M
    @ $113.57 · 2025-02-14
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.91M
    @ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.91M
    @ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.51M
    @ $143.87 · 2024-11-06
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $5.74M
    @ $141.67 · 2024-11-05
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.58M
    @ $144.72 · 2024-09-11
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $12.60M
    @ $157.44 · 2024-08-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    UHS
    0
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.20M
    SUSSMAN ELLIOT M.D.
    Director
    $128,099
    @ $190.06 · 2026-03-13
    NIMETZ WARREN J.
    Director
    $852,343
    @ $223.30 · 2025-11-11
    SUSSMAN ELLIOT M.D.
    Director
    $217,799
    @ $225.70 · 2025-10-29
    SINGER MARIA RUDERMAN
    Director
    $210,053
    @ $191.48 · 2025-05-14
    SINGER MARIA RUDERMAN
    Director
    $179,161
    @ $179.16 · 2025-03-10
    SINGER MARIA RUDERMAN
    Director
    $308,516
    @ $191.15 · 2024-12-11
    SUSSMAN ELLIOT M.D.
    Director
    $375,534
    @ $218.08 · 2024-08-13
    NIMETZ WARREN J.
    Director
    $749,552
    @ $217.64 · 2024-08-12
    CHEN-LANGENMAYR NINA
    Director
    $180,294
    @ $212.11 · 2024-08-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AMD
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(49/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    UHS
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(44/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AMD
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
    UHS
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
    View AMD Full AnalysisView UHS Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: AMD vs UHS

    Is Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Universal Health Services, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, AMD trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $357902777187 vs. price $476), compared to UHS's 60.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $426 vs. $168).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Universal Health Services, Inc.?

    UHS scores 66/100 (Narrow moat), while AMD scores 41/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. in financial distress?

    AMD's Altman Z-Score of 1.0 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. UHS scores 3.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Universal Health Services, Inc.?

    UHS earns 12.3% ROIC versus AMD's 6.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.