Compare Stocks › AMD vs OTIS
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) vs Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS)
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$360.54
VS
OTIS
Otis Worldwide Corporation
$77.08
Rewards
AMD
- ★Free cash flow has grown at a 29.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
- ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.90 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
- ★PEG ratio of 0.64 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
OTIS
- ★Otis Worldwide Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
- ★Otis Worldwide Corporation scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
- ★Dividend yield of 2.21% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
Risks
AMD
- ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
- ⚠FCF yield of 1.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
- ⚠10 insider sales totaling $74.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
OTIS
- ⚠FCF yield of 5.7% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
- ⚠Insiders have sold $16.3M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →AMD
OTIS
Valuation
$6.74B
Free Cash Flow
$1.68B
1.15%
FCF Yield
5.69%
138.67
Trailing P/E
20.50
32.37
Forward P/E
16.34
Quality & Moat
6.97%
ROIC
21.68%
6.88%
ROE
N/A
52.49%
Gross Margin
30.55%
0.64
PEG Ratio
0.48
Balance Sheet Safety
0.06
Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.97
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.96
N/A
Dividend Yield
2.21%
AMD: 3Ties: 1OTIS: 5
AMDOTIS
Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →AMD
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
OTIS
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →AMD
$35.82
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.83B
Δ Market Cap
+$244.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
OTIS
$0.59
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$2.64B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.57B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →AMD
82.7% Overvalued
Price is 82.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $360.54
Strongly undervalued
Fairly valued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $197.32
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
OTIS
9.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 9.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $77.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $85.38
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →AMD
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $361?
+34.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +27.8%
The market implies +34.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.
Standard FCF implies a more demanding +27.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.
OTIS
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $77?
+11.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.0%
The market implies +11.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.
Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →AMD
41/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
OTIS
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →AMD
-2.84
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
OTIS
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →AMD
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 72.3%Retail & Other 27.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,076
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
OTIS
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 94.0%Retail & Other 5.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,726
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →AMD
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $999,328
GUIDO PHILIP
Officer
$999,328
@ $113.56 · 2025-05-20
GUIDO PHILIP
Officer
$499,616
@ $107.56 · 2025-02-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
OTIS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →AMD
10
Sells (3M)
28
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $174.82M
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$10.96M
@ $350.00 · 2026-04-24
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$8.99M
@ $271.47 · 2026-04-16
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$740,925
@ $225.00 · 2026-04-06
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$16.90M
@ $198.77 · 2026-03-12
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$1.54M
@ $204.87 · 2026-03-11
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$606,800
@ $200.00 · 2026-03-04
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$56,814
@ $198.65 · 2026-02-18
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$4.02M
@ $201.62 · 2026-02-17
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$4.22M
@ $216.81 · 2026-02-11
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$26.79M
@ $214.36 · 2026-02-11
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$572,454
@ $234.42 · 2026-01-16
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$26.89M
@ $215.14 · 2025-12-11
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$2.19M
@ $218.77 · 2025-12-04
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$3.05M
@ $209.96 · 2025-11-24
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$4.46M
@ $229.37 · 2025-11-19
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$4.11M
@ $240.12 · 2025-11-14
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.77M
@ $224.28 · 2025-10-15
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$648,197
@ $226.01 · 2025-10-06
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$371,272
@ $165.01 · 2025-09-24
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.67M
@ $159.20 · 2025-09-15
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$2.77M
@ $160.93 · 2025-09-10
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$22,608
@ $158.10 · 2025-09-02
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$36.89M
@ $163.97 · 2025-08-21
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.99M
@ $178.11 · 2025-08-15
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$1.73M
@ $173.21 · 2025-08-12
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.79M
@ $155.03 · 2025-07-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.03M
@ $116.00 · 2025-06-13
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.04M
@ $116.59 · 2025-05-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.67M
@ $95.47 · 2025-04-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.75M
@ $100.27 · 2025-03-14
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.99M
@ $113.57 · 2025-02-14
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$10.91M
@ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$10.91M
@ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$11.51M
@ $143.87 · 2024-11-06
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$5.74M
@ $141.67 · 2024-11-05
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$11.58M
@ $144.72 · 2024-09-11
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$12.60M
@ $157.44 · 2024-08-20
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.09M
@ $184.50 · 2024-07-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.57M
@ $158.94 · 2024-06-14
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$3.23M
@ $161.40 · 2024-06-10
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$23.56M
@ $165.05 · 2024-06-05
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.53M
@ $156.11 · 2024-05-15
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$19.21M
@ $153.69 · 2024-05-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
OTIS
4
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $17.09M
DE MONTLIVAULT STEPHANE
Officer
$4.42M
@ $92.25 · 2026-02-12
RYAN MICHAEL PATRICK
Officer
$106,445
@ $90.05 · 2026-02-10
LAFRENIERE NORA E.
General Counsel
$2.48M
@ $90.38 · 2026-02-10
MARKS JUDITH FRAN
Chief Executive Officer
$9.29M
@ $90.29 · 2026-02-05
GREEN NEIL
Officer
$518,710
@ $86.45 · 2026-02-02
RYAN MICHAEL PATRICK
Officer
$277,647
@ $91.69 · 2025-11-05
DE MONTLIVAULT STEPHANE
Officer
$701,287
@ $105.30 · 2025-03-10
DE MONTLIVAULT STEPHANE
Officer
$2.43M
@ $97.14 · 2025-02-13
MARKS JUDITH FRAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.72M
@ $95.77 · 2025-02-10
LAFRENIERE NORA E.
General Counsel
$163,050
@ $95.91 · 2025-02-10
MARKS JUDITH FRAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.59M
@ $94.41 · 2025-02-05
LAFRENIERE NORA E.
General Counsel
$450,815
@ $94.41 · 2025-02-05
ZHENG PEIMING
Officer
$3.12M
@ $95.43 · 2025-01-31
RYAN MICHAEL PATRICK
Officer
$569,159
@ $100.95 · 2024-11-08
LUERSMAN ABBE
Officer
$909,209
@ $101.02 · 2024-11-07
ZHENG PEIMING
Officer
$2.84M
@ $93.69 · 2024-05-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →AMD
😏Greed(70/100)
"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
OTIS
😨Fear(37/100)
"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →AMD
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
OTIS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)