Compare StocksAMD vs MAR

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) vs Marriott International, Inc. (MAR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, AMD is overvalued at $537, with a DCF intrinsic value of $219 and a margin of safety of -145%. MAR is overvalued at $396, with an intrinsic value of $221 and a margin of safety of -80%. Of the two, MAR has the wider margin of safety.

AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$537.37
VS
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
$396.20

Rewards

AMD
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 29.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.01 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
MAR
  • Marriott International, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 79.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Marriott International, Inc. scores 92/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

AMD
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 0.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 179.7x is 30% above the historical average of 138.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
MAR
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.32 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • FCF yield of 2.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 41.5x is 53% above the historical average of 27.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AMD
MAR
Valuation
$7.17B
Free Cash Flow
$2.61B
0.82%
FCF Yield
2.50%
179.72
Trailing P/E
41.53
41.01
Forward P/E
30.28
Quality & Moat
6.23%
ROIC
19.24%
8.06%
ROE
N/A
53.06%
Gross Margin
79.04%
1.22
PEG Ratio
2.37
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-1.14
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.58
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.73%
AMD: 3Ties: 1MAR: 6
AMDMAR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AMD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MAR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AMD
$35.82
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.83B
Δ Market Cap
+$244.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MAR
$5.97
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.07B
Δ Market Cap
+$36.24B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AMD
78.1% Overvalued
Price is 78.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $537.37
Fair Value: $301.68
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MAR
79.7% Overvalued
Price is 79.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $396.20
Fair Value: $220.51
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AMD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $537?

+34.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +32.6%

The market implies +34.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +32.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

MAR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $396?

+19.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +19.2%

The market implies +19.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +19.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AMD
41/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MAR
92/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AMD
-2.84
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MAR
-2.56
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AMD
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 72.2%Retail & Other 27.4%
No. of Institutional Holders4,190
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MAR
Insiders 17.9%Institutions 64.2%Retail & Other 17.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,139
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AMD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
GUIDO PHILIP
Officer
$999,328
@ $113.56 · 2025-05-20
GUIDO PHILIP
Officer
$499,616
@ $107.56 · 2025-02-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MAR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AMD
8
Sells (3M)
31
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $308.72M
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$57.59M
@ $460.69 · 2026-06-10
DENZEL NORA M
Director
$5.45M
@ $522.00 · 2026-06-02
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$8.41M
@ $431.40 · 2026-05-20
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$55.69M
@ $445.51 · 2026-05-13
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$10.83M
@ $444.39 · 2026-05-08
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$10.96M
@ $350.00 · 2026-04-24
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$8.99M
@ $271.47 · 2026-04-16
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$740,925
@ $225.00 · 2026-04-06
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$16.90M
@ $198.77 · 2026-03-12
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$1.54M
@ $204.87 · 2026-03-11
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$606,800
@ $200.00 · 2026-03-04
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$56,814
@ $198.65 · 2026-02-18
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$4.02M
@ $201.62 · 2026-02-17
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$26.79M
@ $214.36 · 2026-02-11
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$4.22M
@ $216.81 · 2026-02-11
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$572,454
@ $234.42 · 2026-01-16
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$26.89M
@ $215.14 · 2025-12-11
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$2.19M
@ $218.77 · 2025-12-04
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$3.05M
@ $209.96 · 2025-11-24
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$4.46M
@ $229.37 · 2025-11-19
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$4.11M
@ $240.12 · 2025-11-14
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.77M
@ $224.28 · 2025-10-15
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$648,197
@ $226.01 · 2025-10-06
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$371,272
@ $165.01 · 2025-09-24
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.67M
@ $159.20 · 2025-09-15
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$2.77M
@ $160.93 · 2025-09-10
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$22,608
@ $158.10 · 2025-09-02
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$36.89M
@ $163.97 · 2025-08-21
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.99M
@ $178.11 · 2025-08-15
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$1.73M
@ $173.21 · 2025-08-12
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.79M
@ $155.03 · 2025-07-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.03M
@ $116.00 · 2025-06-13
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.04M
@ $116.59 · 2025-05-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.67M
@ $95.47 · 2025-04-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.75M
@ $100.27 · 2025-03-14
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.99M
@ $113.57 · 2025-02-14
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$10.91M
@ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$10.91M
@ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$11.51M
@ $143.87 · 2024-11-06
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$5.74M
@ $141.67 · 2024-11-05
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$11.58M
@ $144.72 · 2024-09-11
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$12.60M
@ $157.44 · 2024-08-20
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.09M
@ $184.50 · 2024-07-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MAR
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $42.96M
ROE PEGGY FANG
Officer
$1.08M
@ $361.56 · 2026-05-18
MAO YIBING
Officer
$1.67M
@ $347.72 · 2026-05-13
MENON RAJEEV
Officer
$1.24M
@ $354.00 · 2026-02-19
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$716,060
@ $358.03 · 2026-02-18
MENON RAJEEV
Officer
$2.26M
@ $356.61 · 2026-02-18
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$3.39M
@ $358.25 · 2026-02-18
PINTO DREW
Chief Technology Officer
$1.44M
@ $359.81 · 2026-02-17
MARRIOTT DAVID SHEETS
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$1.71M
@ $360.00 · 2026-02-17
CAPUANO ANTHONY G
Chief Executive Officer
$22.63M
@ $359.22 · 2026-02-17
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$896,784
@ $357.00 · 2026-02-13
LEE FELITIA
Officer
$494,769
@ $305.98 · 2025-12-15
LEE FELITIA
Officer
$263,280
@ $301.58 · 2025-11-25
ROE PEGGY FANG
Officer
$584,240
@ $292.12 · 2025-11-10
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$472,065
@ $286.10 · 2025-11-07
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$1.57M
@ $287.11 · 2025-11-07
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$1.87M
@ $280.04 · 2025-11-06
MENON RAJEEV
Officer
$670,710
@ $268.28 · 2025-06-24
CAPUANO ANTHONY G
Chief Executive Officer
$3.17M
@ $263.90 · 2025-05-30
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$503,986
@ $272.42 · 2025-05-13
SCHWAB SUSAN C
Director
$292,332
@ $277.62 · 2025-02-24
OBERG KATHLEEN K
Chief Financial Officer
$4.03M
@ $278.07 · 2025-02-21
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$3.61M
@ $285.63 · 2025-02-21
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$1.00M
@ $286.65 · 2025-02-21
ANAND SATYAJIT
Officer
$563,476
@ $293.63 · 2024-12-06
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$485,292
@ $284.30 · 2024-11-22
CAPUANO ANTHONY G
Chief Executive Officer
$2.37M
@ $284.49 · 2024-11-12
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$250,140
@ $284.25 · 2024-11-11
OBERG KATHLEEN K
Chief Financial Officer
$1.18M
@ $283.30 · 2024-11-11
OBERG KATHLEEN K
Chief Financial Officer
$673,568
@ $285.41 · 2024-11-11
PINTO DREW
Chief Technology Officer
$280,719
@ $280.72 · 2024-11-08
BROWN WILLIAM P
Officer
$567,783
@ $278.73 · 2024-11-08
LEE FELITIA
Officer
$253,256
@ $276.48 · 2024-11-07
ROE PEGGY FANG
Officer
$828,390
@ $276.13 · 2024-11-07
REISS RENA HOZORE
General Counsel
$962,865
@ $276.13 · 2024-11-07
BRELAND BENJAMIN T
Officer
$137,245
@ $274.49 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AMD
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MAR
FearGreed
😏Greed(69/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AMD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
MAR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
View AMD Full AnalysisView MAR Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AMD vs MAR

Is Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Marriott International, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MAR trades at a -79.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $221 vs. price $396), compared to AMD's -144.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $219 vs. $537).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Marriott International, Inc.?

MAR scores 92/100 (Wide moat), while AMD scores 41/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Marriott International, Inc.?

Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) generates a 2.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s 0.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Marriott International, Inc.?

MAR earns 19.2% ROIC versus AMD's 6.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.