Compare StocksAMD vs KDP

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) vs Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, AMD is undervalued at $476, with a DCF intrinsic value of $357902777187 and a margin of safety of 100%. KDP is overvalued at $31, with an intrinsic value of $23 and a margin of safety of -38%. Of the two, AMD has the wider margin of safety.

AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$476.15
VS
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
$31.12

Rewards

AMD
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 29.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.01 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
KDP
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.96 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

AMD
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.00 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $144.5M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
KDP
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.36 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 15.4% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AMD
KDP
Valuation
$7.17B
Free Cash Flow
$-16.35B
N/A
FCF Yield
-38.60%
158.72
Trailing P/E
23.05
34.33
Forward P/E
12.31
Quality & Moat
6.23%
ROIC
4.07%
8.06%
ROE
6.31%
53.06%
Gross Margin
53.78%
1.12
PEG Ratio
1.04
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.83
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-1.14
Net Debt / EBITDA
6.30
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.96%
AMD: 5Ties: 2KDP: 4
AMDKDP

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AMD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

KDP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AMD
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$6.83B
Δ Market Cap
+$149.39
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
KDP
$-5.75
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.12B
Δ Market Cap
$-12.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AMD
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $476.15
Fair Value: $491923763775.66
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
KDP
37.9% Overvalued
Price is 37.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $31.12
Fair Value: $22.57
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AMD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $476?

-30.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -30.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

KDP

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AMD
41/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
KDP
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AMD
-2.84
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
KDP
-2.36
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AMD
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 72.0%Retail & Other 27.6%
No. of Institutional Holders4,601
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
KDP
Insiders 5.0%Institutions 100.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,260
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AMD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
GUIDO PHILIP
Officer
$999,328
@ $113.56 · 2025-05-20
GUIDO PHILIP
Officer
$499,616
@ $107.56 · 2025-02-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
KDP
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $254,056
GORLI ERIC
Officer
$254,056
@ $27.69 · 2025-09-11
VAN DE VEN MICHAEL G
Director
$498,000
@ $33.20 · 2025-06-04
JAB BEVCO B.V.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$120.68M
@ $33.34 · 2025-01-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AMD
7
Sells (3M)
32
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $312.48M
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.34M
@ $556.43 · 2026-07-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.22M
@ $536.33 · 2026-06-15
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$57.59M
@ $460.69 · 2026-06-10
DENZEL NORA M
Director
$5.45M
@ $522.00 · 2026-06-02
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$8.41M
@ $431.40 · 2026-05-20
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$55.69M
@ $445.51 · 2026-05-13
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$10.83M
@ $444.39 · 2026-05-08
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$10.96M
@ $350.00 · 2026-04-24
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$8.99M
@ $271.47 · 2026-04-16
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$740,925
@ $225.00 · 2026-04-06
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$16.90M
@ $198.77 · 2026-03-12
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$1.54M
@ $204.87 · 2026-03-11
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$606,800
@ $200.00 · 2026-03-04
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$56,814
@ $198.65 · 2026-02-18
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$4.02M
@ $201.62 · 2026-02-17
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$26.79M
@ $214.36 · 2026-02-11
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$4.22M
@ $216.81 · 2026-02-11
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$572,454
@ $234.42 · 2026-01-16
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$26.89M
@ $215.14 · 2025-12-11
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$2.19M
@ $218.77 · 2025-12-04
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$3.05M
@ $209.96 · 2025-11-24
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$4.46M
@ $229.37 · 2025-11-19
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$4.11M
@ $240.12 · 2025-11-14
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.77M
@ $224.28 · 2025-10-15
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$648,197
@ $226.01 · 2025-10-06
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$371,272
@ $165.01 · 2025-09-24
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.67M
@ $159.20 · 2025-09-15
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$2.77M
@ $160.93 · 2025-09-10
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$22,608
@ $158.10 · 2025-09-02
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$36.89M
@ $163.97 · 2025-08-21
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.99M
@ $178.11 · 2025-08-15
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$1.73M
@ $173.21 · 2025-08-12
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.79M
@ $155.03 · 2025-07-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.03M
@ $116.00 · 2025-06-13
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.04M
@ $116.59 · 2025-05-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.67M
@ $95.47 · 2025-04-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.75M
@ $100.27 · 2025-03-14
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.99M
@ $113.57 · 2025-02-14
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$10.91M
@ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$10.91M
@ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$11.51M
@ $143.87 · 2024-11-06
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$5.74M
@ $141.67 · 2024-11-05
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$11.58M
@ $144.72 · 2024-09-11
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$12.60M
@ $157.44 · 2024-08-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
KDP
0
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $568,152
STEPHENS ANGELA A
Officer
$295,200
@ $29.52 · 2025-12-12
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Director
$272,952
@ $35.91 · 2025-08-20
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Director
$6.84M
@ $32.90 · 2025-08-01
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Director
$6.90M
@ $33.18 · 2025-07-29
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$403,920
@ $33.66 · 2025-07-17
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$403,726
@ $33.64 · 2025-07-01
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$403,680
@ $33.64 · 2025-06-20
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$395,040
@ $32.92 · 2025-06-03
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Director
$6.88M
@ $33.10 · 2025-06-02
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$398,520
@ $33.21 · 2025-05-22
STEPHENS ANGELA A
Officer
$496,480
@ $34.24 · 2025-05-07
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$409,320
@ $34.11 · 2025-05-06
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Director
$14.16M
@ $34.04 · 2025-05-01
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$427,080
@ $35.59 · 2025-04-17
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$417,360
@ $34.78 · 2025-04-01
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$400,680
@ $33.39 · 2025-03-20
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$408,600
@ $34.05 · 2025-03-04
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Officer and Director
$14.26M
@ $34.29 · 2025-03-04
STEPHENS ANGELA A
Officer
$251,150
@ $34.17 · 2025-03-03
JAB BEVCO B.V.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$2.25B
@ $32.65 · 2024-10-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AMD
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
KDP
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AMD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
KDP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
View AMD Full AnalysisView KDP Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AMD vs KDP

Is Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AMD trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $357902777187 vs. price $476), compared to KDP's -37.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $23 vs. $31).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.?

KDP scores 69/100 (Narrow moat), while AMD scores 41/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. in financial distress?

AMD's Altman Z-Score of 1.0 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. KDP scores 1.4 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.?

AMD earns 6.2% ROIC versus KDP's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.