Compare Stocks › AMD vs HAL
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) vs Halliburton Company (HAL)
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$205.27
VS
HAL
Halliburton Company
$36.93
Rewards
AMD
- ★Free cash flow has grown at a 29.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
- ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $35.82 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
- ★Trailing P/E of 78.6x is 43% below the historical average of 138.5x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
HAL
- ★Halliburton Company has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
- ★Free cash flow has grown at a 10.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
- ★Dividend yield of 1.84% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
Risks
AMD
- ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
- ⚠FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
- ⚠8 insider sales totaling $54.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
HAL
- ⚠Gross margin of 15.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
- ⚠FCF yield of 6.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
- ⚠Trailing P/E of 24.6x is 55% above the historical average of 15.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →AMD
HAL
Valuation
$6.74B
Free Cash Flow
$2.14B
2.01%
FCF Yield
6.88%
78.65
Trailing P/E
24.62
19.10
Forward P/E
13.78
Quality & Moat
6.97%
ROIC
13.88%
6.88%
ROE
12.21%
52.49%
Gross Margin
15.71%
0.36
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.06
Debt / Equity
0.79
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.97
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.48
N/A
Dividend Yield
1.84%
AMD: 4Ties: 1HAL: 5
AMDHAL
Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →AMD
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
HAL
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →AMD
$35.82
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.83B
Δ Market Cap
+$244.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
HAL
$-2.55
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$4.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-11.91B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →AMD
4.0% Overvalued
Price is 4.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $205.27
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $197.32
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
HAL
65.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 65.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $36.93
Strongly undervalued
Fairly valued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $105.68
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →AMD
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $205?
+26.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +19.8%
The market implies +26.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.
Standard FCF implies a more demanding +19.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.
HAL
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $37?
+5.8%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate
Market roughly matching historical growth — reasonable.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →AMD
41/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
HAL
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →AMD
-2.84
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
HAL
-2.68
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →AMD
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 72.3%Retail & Other 27.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,072
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
HAL
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 88.9%Retail & Other 10.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,377
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →AMD
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $999,328
GUIDO PHILIP
Officer
$999,328
@ $113.56 · 2025-05-20
GUIDO PHILIP
Officer
$499,616
@ $107.56 · 2025-02-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
HAL
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $169,162
WEISS JANET L.
Director
$169,162
@ $19.79 · 2025-05-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →AMD
8
Sells (3M)
26
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $155.80M
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$16.90M
@ $198.77 · 2026-03-12
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$1.54M
@ $204.87 · 2026-03-11
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$606,800
@ $200.00 · 2026-03-04
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$56,814
@ $198.65 · 2026-02-18
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$4.02M
@ $201.62 · 2026-02-17
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$26.79M
@ $214.36 · 2026-02-11
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$4.22M
@ $216.81 · 2026-02-11
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$572,454
@ $234.42 · 2026-01-16
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$26.89M
@ $215.14 · 2025-12-11
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$2.19M
@ $218.77 · 2025-12-04
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$3.05M
@ $209.96 · 2025-11-24
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$4.46M
@ $229.37 · 2025-11-19
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$4.11M
@ $240.12 · 2025-11-14
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.77M
@ $224.28 · 2025-10-15
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$648,197
@ $226.01 · 2025-10-06
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$371,272
@ $165.01 · 2025-09-24
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.67M
@ $159.20 · 2025-09-15
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$2.77M
@ $160.93 · 2025-09-10
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$22,608
@ $158.10 · 2025-09-02
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$36.89M
@ $163.97 · 2025-08-21
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.99M
@ $178.11 · 2025-08-15
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$1.73M
@ $173.21 · 2025-08-12
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.79M
@ $155.03 · 2025-07-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.03M
@ $116.00 · 2025-06-13
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.04M
@ $116.59 · 2025-05-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.67M
@ $95.47 · 2025-04-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.75M
@ $100.27 · 2025-03-14
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.99M
@ $113.57 · 2025-02-14
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$10.91M
@ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$10.91M
@ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$11.51M
@ $143.87 · 2024-11-06
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$5.74M
@ $141.67 · 2024-11-05
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$11.58M
@ $144.72 · 2024-09-11
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$12.60M
@ $157.44 · 2024-08-20
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.09M
@ $184.50 · 2024-07-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.57M
@ $158.94 · 2024-06-14
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$3.23M
@ $161.40 · 2024-06-10
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$23.56M
@ $165.05 · 2024-06-05
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.53M
@ $156.11 · 2024-05-15
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$19.21M
@ $153.69 · 2024-05-08
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.66M
@ $164.25 · 2024-04-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
HAL
9
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $18.22M
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$663,481
@ $33.82 · 2026-03-16
SLOCUM JEFFREY SHANNON
Chief Operating Officer
$184,015
@ $33.82 · 2026-03-16
MCKEON TIMOTHY M.
Officer and Treasurer
$132,187
@ $34.37 · 2026-03-06
BANKS MARGARET KATHERINE
Director
$88,855
@ $34.17 · 2026-01-26
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$1.90M
@ $34.96 · 2026-01-23
MILLER JEFFREY ALLEN
Chief Executive Officer
$5.99M
@ $34.96 · 2026-01-23
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$574,875
@ $32.30 · 2026-01-09
SLOCUM JEFFREY SHANNON
Chief Operating Officer
$771,808
@ $32.30 · 2026-01-09
POPE LAWRENCE J.
Officer
$3.23M
@ $32.25 · 2026-01-05
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$246,938
@ $27.89 · 2025-12-05
RICHARD MARK
Officer
$4.44M
@ $27.77 · 2025-11-12
CARRE ERIC
Chief Financial Officer
$1.28M
@ $25.00 · 2025-03-14
MCKEON TIMOTHY M.
Officer and Treasurer
$258,226
@ $24.60 · 2025-03-07
BANKS MARGARET KATHERINE
Director
$93,736
@ $24.03 · 2025-03-04
CARRE ERIC
Chief Financial Officer
$3.69M
@ $26.13 · 2025-02-11
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$367,500
@ $36.75 · 2024-07-18
SHARP JILL D
Officer
$263,454
@ $38.00 · 2024-05-20
GEER CHARLES JR
Officer
$114,000
@ $38.00 · 2024-05-20
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$369,200
@ $36.92 · 2024-05-07
SHARP JILL D
Officer
$123,802
@ $37.00 · 2024-05-07
SLOCUM JEFFREY SHANNON
Officer
$1.44M
@ $36.92 · 2024-05-07
JONES MYRTLE L
Officer
$940,685
@ $36.92 · 2024-05-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →AMD
😐Neutral(49/100)
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
HAL
😏Greed(64/100)
"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →AMD
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
HAL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)