Compare Stocks › AMD vs FITB

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) vs Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, AMD is overvalued at $505, with a DCF intrinsic value of $219 and a margin of safety of -130%. FITB is undervalued at $54, with an intrinsic value of $92 and a margin of safety of 42%. Of the two, FITB has the wider margin of safety.

AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$504.80
VS
FITB
Fifth Third Bancorp
$53.87

Rewards

AMD
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 29.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.01 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
FITB
  • ★Fifth Third Bancorp scores 84/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

AMD
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 1.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠10 insider sales totaling $66.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
FITB
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.22 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 18.1x is 54% above the historical average of 11.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AMD
FITB
Valuation
$8.84B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
1.07%
FCF Yield
N/A
128.78
Trailing P/E
18.08
31.66
Forward P/E
10.88
Quality & Moat
7.87%
ROIC
17.01%
10.20%
ROE
9.42%
55.72%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.50
PEG Ratio
1.72
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.92
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
3.12%
AMD: 3Ties: 1FITB: 4
AMDFITB

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AMD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

FITB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AMD
$35.82
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.83B
Δ Market Cap
+$244.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
FITB
$2.25
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.79B
Δ Market Cap
+$8.53B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AMD
67.4% Overvalued
Price is 67.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $504.80
Fair Value: $301.56
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
FITB
41.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 41.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $53.87
Fair Value: $92.38
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AMD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $505?

+33.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +28.8%

The market implies +33.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +28.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

FITB

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AMD
41/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
FITB
84/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AMD
-2.84
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
FITB
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AMD
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 75.4%Retail & Other 24.2%
No. of Institutional Holders5,170
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
FITB
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 93.1%Retail & Other 6.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,664
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AMD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
GUIDO PHILIP
Officer
$999,328
@ $113.56 · 2025-05-20
GUIDO PHILIP
Officer
$499,616
@ $107.56 · 2025-02-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
FITB
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BAYH B EVAN III
Director
$123,650
@ $41.22 · 2025-10-20
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AMD
10
Sells (3M)
33
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $327.53M
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$9.33M
@ $540.70 · 2026-10-15
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$8.68M
@ $503.05 · 2026-09-15
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$7.11M
@ $474.08 · 2026-08-25
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$7.94M
@ $459.95 · 2026-08-24
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$13.60M
@ $471.87 · 2026-08-20
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$7.21M
@ $480.94 · 2026-08-18
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$1.46M
@ $488.69 · 2026-08-18
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$7.72M
@ $514.91 · 2026-08-17
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.79M
@ $514.39 · 2026-08-14
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$67,889
@ $474.75 · 2026-08-11
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.34M
@ $556.43 · 2026-07-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.22M
@ $536.33 · 2026-06-15
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$57.59M
@ $460.69 · 2026-06-10
DENZEL NORA M
Director
$5.45M
@ $522.00 · 2026-06-02
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$8.41M
@ $431.40 · 2026-05-20
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$55.69M
@ $445.51 · 2026-05-13
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$10.83M
@ $444.39 · 2026-05-08
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$10.96M
@ $350.00 · 2026-04-24
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$8.99M
@ $271.47 · 2026-04-16
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$740,925
@ $225.00 · 2026-04-06
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$16.90M
@ $198.77 · 2026-03-12
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$1.54M
@ $204.87 · 2026-03-11
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$606,800
@ $200.00 · 2026-03-04
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$56,814
@ $198.65 · 2026-02-18
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$4.02M
@ $201.62 · 2026-02-17
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$26.79M
@ $214.36 · 2026-02-11
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$4.22M
@ $216.81 · 2026-02-11
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$572,454
@ $234.42 · 2026-01-16
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$26.89M
@ $215.14 · 2025-12-11
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$2.19M
@ $218.77 · 2025-12-04
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$3.05M
@ $209.96 · 2025-11-24
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$4.46M
@ $229.37 · 2025-11-19
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$4.11M
@ $240.12 · 2025-11-14
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.77M
@ $224.28 · 2025-10-15
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$648,197
@ $226.01 · 2025-10-06
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$371,272
@ $165.01 · 2025-09-24
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.67M
@ $159.20 · 2025-09-15
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$2.77M
@ $160.93 · 2025-09-10
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$22,608
@ $158.10 · 2025-09-02
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$36.89M
@ $163.97 · 2025-08-21
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.99M
@ $178.11 · 2025-08-15
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$1.73M
@ $173.21 · 2025-08-12
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.79M
@ $155.03 · 2025-07-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.03M
@ $116.00 · 2025-06-13
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.04M
@ $116.59 · 2025-05-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.67M
@ $95.47 · 2025-04-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.75M
@ $100.27 · 2025-03-14
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.99M
@ $113.57 · 2025-02-14
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$10.91M
@ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$10.91M
@ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$11.51M
@ $143.87 · 2024-11-06
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$5.74M
@ $141.67 · 2024-11-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
FITB
1
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.43M
SCHRAMM JUDE
Chief Technology Officer
$1.06M
@ $53.14 · 2026-10-26
SEFZIK PETER L
Officer
$1.01M
@ $50.46 · 2026-04-28
KHANNA KEVIN J
Officer
$304,630
@ $50.77 · 2026-04-20
SCHRAMM JUDE
Chief Technology Officer
$757,515
@ $50.85 · 2026-02-24
SPENCE TIMOTHY
Chief Executive Officer
$184,868
@ $54.05 · 2026-02-18
SCHRAMM JUDE
Chief Technology Officer
$109,125
@ $48.50 · 2025-12-11
KHANNA KEVIN J
Officer
$597,426
@ $42.67 · 2025-08-15
GIBSON KALA
Officer
$392,712
@ $43.64 · 2025-02-20
LAVENDER KEVIN P
Officer
$945,100
@ $43.55 · 2025-02-20
LEONARD JAMES C
Chief Operating Officer
$761,279
@ $44.26 · 2025-02-19
SPENCE TIMOTHY
Chief Executive Officer
$346,979
@ $44.10 · 2025-02-18
SHAFFER ROBERT P
Officer
$1.22M
@ $48.65 · 2024-11-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AMD
FearGreed
😐Neutral(44/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
FITB
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AMD
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
FITB
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
View AMD Full AnalysisView FITB Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AMD vs FITB

Is Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Fifth Third Bancorp more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, FITB trades at a 41.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $92 vs. price $54), compared to AMD's -130.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $219 vs. $505).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Fifth Third Bancorp?▼

FITB scores 84/100 (Wide moat), while AMD scores 41/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Fifth Third Bancorp in financial distress?▼

FITB's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AMD scores 16.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Fifth Third Bancorp?▼

FITB earns 17.0% ROIC versus AMD's 7.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.