Compare StocksAMD vs ED

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) vs Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, AMD is undervalued at $476, with a DCF intrinsic value of $357902777187 and a margin of safety of 100%. ED is undervalued at $109, with an intrinsic value of $12661591852 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, AMD has the wider margin of safety.

AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$476.15
VS
ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
$108.85

Rewards

AMD
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 29.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.01 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
ED
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.34 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

AMD
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.00 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $144.5M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
ED
  • PEG ratio of 2.96 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.64 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AMD
ED
Valuation
$7.17B
Free Cash Flow
$-833.25M
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
158.72
Trailing P/E
18.36
34.33
Forward P/E
16.77
Quality & Moat
6.23%
ROIC
6.60%
8.06%
ROE
8.73%
53.06%
Gross Margin
53.19%
1.12
PEG Ratio
2.96
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
1.06
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-1.14
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.49
0.00%
Dividend Yield
3.23%
AMD: 4Ties: 2ED: 5
AMDED

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AMD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ED

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AMD
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$6.83B
Δ Market Cap
+$149.39
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ED
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$3.00B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.01
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AMD
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $476.15
Fair Value: $491923763775.66
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ED
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $108.85
Fair Value: $12661591852.25
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AMD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $476?

-30.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -30.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

ED

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AMD
41/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ED
46/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AMD
-2.84
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ED
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AMD
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 72.0%Retail & Other 27.6%
No. of Institutional Holders4,601
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ED
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 75.0%Retail & Other 24.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,858
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AMD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
GUIDO PHILIP
Officer
$999,328
@ $113.56 · 2025-05-20
GUIDO PHILIP
Officer
$499,616
@ $107.56 · 2025-02-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ED
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $207.00
MILLER JOSEPH
Officer
$104.00
@ $104.00 · 2025-12-15
MILLER JOSEPH
Officer
$103.00
@ $103.00 · 2025-09-15
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AMD
7
Sells (3M)
32
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $312.48M
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.34M
@ $556.43 · 2026-07-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.22M
@ $536.33 · 2026-06-15
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$57.59M
@ $460.69 · 2026-06-10
DENZEL NORA M
Director
$5.45M
@ $522.00 · 2026-06-02
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$8.41M
@ $431.40 · 2026-05-20
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$55.69M
@ $445.51 · 2026-05-13
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$10.83M
@ $444.39 · 2026-05-08
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$10.96M
@ $350.00 · 2026-04-24
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$8.99M
@ $271.47 · 2026-04-16
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$740,925
@ $225.00 · 2026-04-06
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$16.90M
@ $198.77 · 2026-03-12
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$1.54M
@ $204.87 · 2026-03-11
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$606,800
@ $200.00 · 2026-03-04
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$56,814
@ $198.65 · 2026-02-18
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$4.02M
@ $201.62 · 2026-02-17
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$26.79M
@ $214.36 · 2026-02-11
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$4.22M
@ $216.81 · 2026-02-11
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$572,454
@ $234.42 · 2026-01-16
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$26.89M
@ $215.14 · 2025-12-11
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$2.19M
@ $218.77 · 2025-12-04
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$3.05M
@ $209.96 · 2025-11-24
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$4.46M
@ $229.37 · 2025-11-19
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$4.11M
@ $240.12 · 2025-11-14
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.77M
@ $224.28 · 2025-10-15
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$648,197
@ $226.01 · 2025-10-06
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$371,272
@ $165.01 · 2025-09-24
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.67M
@ $159.20 · 2025-09-15
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$2.77M
@ $160.93 · 2025-09-10
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$22,608
@ $158.10 · 2025-09-02
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$36.89M
@ $163.97 · 2025-08-21
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.99M
@ $178.11 · 2025-08-15
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$1.73M
@ $173.21 · 2025-08-12
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.79M
@ $155.03 · 2025-07-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.03M
@ $116.00 · 2025-06-13
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.04M
@ $116.59 · 2025-05-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.67M
@ $95.47 · 2025-04-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.75M
@ $100.27 · 2025-03-14
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.99M
@ $113.57 · 2025-02-14
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$10.91M
@ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$10.91M
@ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$11.51M
@ $143.87 · 2024-11-06
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$5.74M
@ $141.67 · 2024-11-05
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$11.58M
@ $144.72 · 2024-09-11
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$12.60M
@ $157.44 · 2024-08-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ED
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.33M
DONNLEY DENEEN L
General Counsel
$218,993
@ $113.94 · 2026-03-12
MULROW WILLIAM J
Director
$892,553
@ $112.81 · 2026-02-27
KILLIAN JOHN F
Director
$220,522
@ $96.89 · 2025-12-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AMD
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ED
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AMD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
ED
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
View AMD Full AnalysisView ED Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AMD vs ED

Is Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Consolidated Edison, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AMD trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $357902777187 vs. price $476), compared to ED's 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $12661591852 vs. $109).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Consolidated Edison, Inc.?

ED scores 46/100 (Narrow moat), while AMD scores 41/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Consolidated Edison, Inc. in financial distress?

ED's Altman Z-Score of 0.6 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AMD scores 1.0 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or Consolidated Edison, Inc.?

ED earns 6.6% ROIC versus AMD's 6.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

AMD vs ED: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io