Compare StocksAMD vs BG

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) vs Bunge Global SA (BG)

AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$205.27
VS
BG
Bunge Global SA
$122.04

Rewards

AMD
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 29.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $35.82 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Trailing P/E of 78.6x is 43% below the historical average of 138.5x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
BG

    Risks

    AMD
    • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
    • FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • 8 insider sales totaling $54.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    BG
    • ROIC has declined by 9.1 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 4.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Bunge Global SA scores only 29/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AMD
    BG
    Valuation
    $6.74B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-7.11B
    2.01%
    FCF Yield
    -30.09%
    78.65
    Trailing P/E
    24.75
    19.10
    Forward P/E
    12.15
    Quality & Moat
    6.97%
    ROIC
    2.10%
    6.88%
    ROE
    4.68%
    52.49%
    Gross Margin
    4.85%
    0.36
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.06
    Debt / Equity
    0.91
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.97
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    6.62
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    2.29%
    AMD: 7Ties: 1BG: 2
    AMDBG

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AMD

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    BG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AMD
    $35.82
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $6.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$244.67B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    BG
    $0.76
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Mediocre Allocator
    Σ Retained
    $2.98B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.27B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AMD
    4.0% Overvalued
    Price is 4.0% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $205.27
    Fair Value: $197.32
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    BG
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $122.04
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AMD

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $205?

    +26.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +19.8%

    The market implies +26.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +19.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    BG

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AMD
    41/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    BG
    29/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AMD
    -2.84
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    BG
    -1.61
    Likely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AMD
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 72.3%Retail & Other 27.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,071
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    BG
    Insiders 17.8%Institutions 76.9%Retail & Other 5.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders974
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AMD
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $999,328
    GUIDO PHILIP
    Officer
    $999,328
    @ $113.56 · 2025-05-20
    GUIDO PHILIP
    Officer
    $499,616
    @ $107.56 · 2025-02-07
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    BG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $408,650
    MAHONEY CHRISTOPHER
    Director
    $408,650
    @ $81.73 · 2025-08-18
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AMD
    8
    Sells (3M)
    26
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $155.80M
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.90M
    @ $198.77 · 2026-03-12
    GRASBY PAUL DARREN
    Officer
    $1.54M
    @ $204.87 · 2026-03-11
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $606,800
    @ $200.00 · 2026-03-04
    HAHN AVA M
    General Counsel
    $56,814
    @ $198.65 · 2026-02-18
    HU JEAN X
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.02M
    @ $201.62 · 2026-02-17
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $26.79M
    @ $214.36 · 2026-02-11
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $4.22M
    @ $216.81 · 2026-02-11
    HAHN AVA M
    General Counsel
    $572,454
    @ $234.42 · 2026-01-16
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $26.89M
    @ $215.14 · 2025-12-11
    GRASBY PAUL DARREN
    Officer
    $2.19M
    @ $218.77 · 2025-12-04
    HU JEAN X
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.05M
    @ $209.96 · 2025-11-24
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $4.46M
    @ $229.37 · 2025-11-19
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $4.11M
    @ $240.12 · 2025-11-14
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $3.77M
    @ $224.28 · 2025-10-15
    HAHN AVA M
    General Counsel
    $648,197
    @ $226.01 · 2025-10-06
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $371,272
    @ $165.01 · 2025-09-24
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.67M
    @ $159.20 · 2025-09-15
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $2.77M
    @ $160.93 · 2025-09-10
    HAHN AVA M
    General Counsel
    $22,608
    @ $158.10 · 2025-09-02
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $36.89M
    @ $163.97 · 2025-08-21
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.99M
    @ $178.11 · 2025-08-15
    GRASBY PAUL DARREN
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $173.21 · 2025-08-12
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.79M
    @ $155.03 · 2025-07-15
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $116.00 · 2025-06-13
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.04M
    @ $116.59 · 2025-05-15
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.67M
    @ $95.47 · 2025-04-15
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.75M
    @ $100.27 · 2025-03-14
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.99M
    @ $113.57 · 2025-02-14
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.91M
    @ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.91M
    @ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.51M
    @ $143.87 · 2024-11-06
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $5.74M
    @ $141.67 · 2024-11-05
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.58M
    @ $144.72 · 2024-09-11
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $12.60M
    @ $157.44 · 2024-08-20
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $3.09M
    @ $184.50 · 2024-07-15
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.57M
    @ $158.94 · 2024-06-14
    HU JEAN X
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.23M
    @ $161.40 · 2024-06-10
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $23.56M
    @ $165.05 · 2024-06-05
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.53M
    @ $156.11 · 2024-05-15
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $19.21M
    @ $153.69 · 2024-05-08
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.66M
    @ $164.25 · 2024-04-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    BG
    1
    Sells (3M)
    2
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.72M
    GARROS JULIO
    Chief Operating Officer
    $336,889
    @ $119.00 · 2026-02-11
    DIMOPOULOS CHRISTOS
    Officer
    $2.39M
    @ $94.37 · 2025-11-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AMD
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(49/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    BG
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(63/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AMD
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
    BG
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
    View AMD Full AnalysisView BG Full Analysis