Compare StocksAMAT vs INTC

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$391.38
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$95.78

Rewards

AMAT
  • Applied Materials, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Applied Materials, Inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
INTC

    Risks

    AMAT
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.30 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    • FCF yield of 1.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • Trailing P/E of 40.1x is 98% above the historical average of 20.3x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    INTC
    Valuation
    $5.70B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    1.83%
    FCF Yield
    -1.72%
    40.06
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    27.81
    Forward P/E
    64.22
    Quality & Moat
    23.05%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    32.22%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    48.72%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    0.53
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.33
    Debt / Equity
    0.36
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.15
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    0.54%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    AMAT: 9Ties: 1INTC: 0
    AMATINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AMAT

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    $6.96
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $17.48B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$121.60B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    31.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 31.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $391.38
    Fair Value: $574.71
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $95.78
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AMAT

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $391?

    +18.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +21.3%

    The market implies +18.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +21.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    93/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    -2.58
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 85.0%Retail & Other 14.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,597
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    DICKERSON GARY E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.87M
    @ $137.30 · 2025-04-03
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    2
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.15M
    SANDERS ADAM
    Officer
    $202,471
    @ $379.16 · 2026-02-24
    HILL BRICE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.81M
    @ $361.21 · 2026-02-17
    SANDERS ADAM
    Officer
    $155,620
    @ $255.53 · 2025-12-01
    LITTLE TERI A
    Officer
    $952,942
    @ $238.24 · 2025-11-25
    LITTLE TERI A
    Officer
    $936,321
    @ $234.08 · 2025-11-19
    SANDERS ADAM
    Officer
    $100,373
    @ $178.60 · 2025-06-24
    SANDERS ADAM
    Officer
    $65,174
    @ $144.83 · 2025-04-01
    SANDERS ADAM
    Officer
    $46,808
    @ $172.72 · 2025-02-24
    IANNOTTI THOMAS J
    Director
    $2.33M
    @ $236.65 · 2024-06-21
    DICKERSON GARY E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $98.58M
    @ $246.45 · 2024-06-18
    RAJA PRABURAM G.
    Officer
    $12.46M
    @ $249.17 · 2024-06-18
    LITTLE TERI A
    Officer
    $554,050
    @ $221.62 · 2024-06-07
    LITTLE TERI A
    Officer
    $1.60M
    @ $213.02 · 2024-05-31
    HILL BRICE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.45M
    @ $222.34 · 2024-05-28
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(58/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(71/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (71)
    View AMAT Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    AMAT vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io