Compare StocksAMAT vs CRM

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Salesforce, Inc. (CRM)

AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$391.38
VS
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$185.48

Rewards

AMAT
  • Applied Materials, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Applied Materials, Inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.49 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

AMAT
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.30 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • FCF yield of 1.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 40.1x is 98% above the historical average of 20.3x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
CRM

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    CRM
    Valuation
    $5.70B
    Free Cash Flow
    $16.37B
    1.83%
    FCF Yield
    10.79%
    40.06
    Trailing P/E
    23.81
    27.81
    Forward P/E
    12.42
    Quality & Moat
    23.05%
    ROIC
    8.21%
    32.22%
    ROE
    12.61%
    48.72%
    Gross Margin
    77.68%
    0.53
    PEG Ratio
    1.33
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.33
    Debt / Equity
    0.30
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.15
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.65
    0.54%
    Dividend Yield
    0.96%
    AMAT: 4Ties: 1CRM: 7
    AMATCRM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AMAT

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    $6.96
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $17.48B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$121.60B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    CRM
    $-5.85
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-85.83B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    31.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 31.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $391.38
    Fair Value: $574.71
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    CRM
    27.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 27.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $185.48
    Fair Value: $257.23
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AMAT

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $391?

    +18.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +21.3%

    The market implies +18.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +21.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $185?

    +8.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -2.2%

    The market implies +8.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    93/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    -2.58
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 85.0%Retail & Other 14.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,597
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    CRM
    Insiders 3.0%Institutions 95.7%Retail & Other 1.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,813
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    DICKERSON GARY E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.87M
    @ $137.30 · 2025-04-03
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    CRM
    2
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $27.38M
    ALBER LAURA
    Director
    $500,266
    @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,178
    @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $865,827
    @ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    2
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.15M
    SANDERS ADAM
    Officer
    $202,471
    @ $379.16 · 2026-02-24
    HILL BRICE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.81M
    @ $361.21 · 2026-02-17
    SANDERS ADAM
    Officer
    $155,620
    @ $255.53 · 2025-12-01
    LITTLE TERI A
    Officer
    $952,942
    @ $238.24 · 2025-11-25
    LITTLE TERI A
    Officer
    $936,321
    @ $234.08 · 2025-11-19
    SANDERS ADAM
    Officer
    $100,373
    @ $178.60 · 2025-06-24
    SANDERS ADAM
    Officer
    $65,174
    @ $144.83 · 2025-04-01
    SANDERS ADAM
    Officer
    $46,808
    @ $172.72 · 2025-02-24
    IANNOTTI THOMAS J
    Director
    $2.33M
    @ $236.65 · 2024-06-21
    DICKERSON GARY E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $98.58M
    @ $246.45 · 2024-06-18
    RAJA PRABURAM G.
    Officer
    $12.46M
    @ $249.17 · 2024-06-18
    LITTLE TERI A
    Officer
    $554,050
    @ $221.62 · 2024-06-07
    LITTLE TERI A
    Officer
    $1.60M
    @ $213.02 · 2024-05-31
    HILL BRICE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.45M
    @ $222.34 · 2024-05-28
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    CRM
    0
    Sells (3M)
    17
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $41.42M
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $552,798
    @ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $545,384
    @ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $543,378
    @ $241.50 · 2025-09-04
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $572,842
    @ $254.60 · 2025-09-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(58/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    CRM
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(33/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AMAT
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
    CRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
    View AMAT Full AnalysisView CRM Full Analysis
    AMAT vs CRM: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io