Compare StocksAMAT vs BRK-B

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, AMAT is fairly valued at $617, with a DCF intrinsic value of $664 and a margin of safety of 7%. BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with an intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. Of the two, BRK-B has the wider margin of safety.

AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$617.11
VS
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46

Rewards

AMAT
  • Applied Materials, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Applied Materials, Inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

AMAT
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.30 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • FCF yield of 1.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 58.1x is 186% above the historical average of 20.3x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AMAT
BRK-B
Valuation
$5.70B
Free Cash Flow
$61.23B
1.16%
FCF Yield
5.80%
58.05
Trailing P/E
14.56
37.95
Forward P/E
22.79
Quality & Moat
23.46%
ROIC
4.96%
39.69%
ROE
10.50%
48.96%
Gross Margin
27.78%
1.89
PEG Ratio
10.06
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.10
Net Debt / EBITDA
-2.28
0.32%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
AMAT: 5Ties: 1BRK-B: 6
AMATBRK-B

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AMAT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AMAT
$6.96
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$17.48B
Δ Market Cap
+$121.60B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AMAT
8.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 8.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $617.11
Fair Value: $670.69
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AMAT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $617?

+24.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +27.7%

The market implies +24.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +27.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AMAT
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AMAT
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AMAT
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 85.1%Retail & Other 14.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,844
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AMAT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
DICKERSON GARY E
Chief Executive Officer
$6.87M
@ $137.30 · 2025-04-03
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AMAT
2
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.52M
HILL BRICE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $498.86 · 2026-06-03
SANDERS ADAM
Officer
$116,370
@ $434.22 · 2026-05-22
SANDERS ADAM
Officer
$202,471
@ $379.16 · 2026-02-24
HILL BRICE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.81M
@ $361.21 · 2026-02-17
SANDERS ADAM
Officer
$155,620
@ $255.53 · 2025-12-01
LITTLE TERI A
Officer
$952,942
@ $238.24 · 2025-11-25
LITTLE TERI A
Officer
$936,321
@ $234.08 · 2025-11-19
SANDERS ADAM
Officer
$100,373
@ $178.60 · 2025-06-24
SANDERS ADAM
Officer
$65,174
@ $144.83 · 2025-04-01
SANDERS ADAM
Officer
$46,808
@ $172.72 · 2025-02-24
IANNOTTI THOMAS J
Director
$2.33M
@ $236.65 · 2024-06-21
RAJA PRABURAM G.
Officer
$12.46M
@ $249.17 · 2024-06-18
DICKERSON GARY E
Chief Executive Officer
$98.58M
@ $246.45 · 2024-06-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AMAT
FearGreed
😏Greed(71/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AMAT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (71)
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
View AMAT Full AnalysisView BRK-B Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AMAT vs BRK-B

Is Applied Materials, Inc. or Berkshire Hathaway Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BRK-B trades at a 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $644 vs. price $489), compared to AMAT's 7.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $664 vs. $617).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Applied Materials, Inc. or Berkshire Hathaway Inc.?

AMAT scores 93/100 (Wide moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in financial distress?

BRK-B's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AMAT scores 11.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Applied Materials, Inc. or Berkshire Hathaway Inc.?

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) generates a 5.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Applied Materials, Inc.'s 1.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Applied Materials, Inc. or Berkshire Hathaway Inc.?

AMAT earns 23.5% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.