Compare StocksAMAT vs AMD

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, AMAT is fairly valued at $617, with a DCF intrinsic value of $664 and a margin of safety of 7%. AMD is overvalued at $537, with an intrinsic value of $219 and a margin of safety of -145%. Of the two, AMAT has the wider margin of safety.

AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$617.11
VS
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$537.37

Rewards

AMAT
  • Applied Materials, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Applied Materials, Inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
AMD
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 29.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.01 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

Risks

AMAT
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.30 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • FCF yield of 1.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 58.2x is 187% above the historical average of 20.3x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
AMD
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 0.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 178.5x is 29% above the historical average of 138.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AMAT
AMD
Valuation
$5.70B
Free Cash Flow
$7.17B
1.16%
FCF Yield
0.82%
58.16
Trailing P/E
178.53
37.87
Forward P/E
41.01
Quality & Moat
23.46%
ROIC
6.23%
39.69%
ROE
8.06%
48.96%
Gross Margin
53.06%
2.05
PEG Ratio
1.29
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.10
Net Debt / EBITDA
-1.14
0.34%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
AMAT: 6Ties: 1AMD: 5
AMATAMD

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AMAT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

AMD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AMAT
$6.96
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$17.48B
Δ Market Cap
+$121.60B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
AMD
$35.82
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.83B
Δ Market Cap
+$244.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AMAT
8.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 8.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $617.11
Fair Value: $670.69
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
AMD
78.1% Overvalued
Price is 78.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $537.37
Fair Value: $301.68
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AMAT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $617?

+24.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +27.7%

The market implies +24.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +27.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

AMD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $537?

+34.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +32.6%

The market implies +34.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +32.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AMAT
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
AMD
41/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AMAT
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
AMD
-2.84
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AMAT
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 85.1%Retail & Other 14.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,849
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
AMD
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 72.2%Retail & Other 27.4%
No. of Institutional Holders4,196
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AMAT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
DICKERSON GARY E
Chief Executive Officer
$6.87M
@ $137.30 · 2025-04-03
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
AMD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
GUIDO PHILIP
Officer
$999,328
@ $113.56 · 2025-05-20
GUIDO PHILIP
Officer
$499,616
@ $107.56 · 2025-02-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AMAT
6
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $86.15M
DICKERSON GARY E
Chief Executive Officer
$49.24M
@ $593.24 · 2026-06-16
IANNOTTI THOMAS J
Director
$5.55M
@ $599.77 · 2026-06-16
NALAMASU OMKARAM
Chief Technology Officer
$20.75M
@ $592.98 · 2026-06-16
DEANE TIMOTHY M
Officer
$5.09M
@ $590.76 · 2026-06-15
HILL BRICE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $498.86 · 2026-06-03
SANDERS ADAM
Officer
$116,370
@ $434.22 · 2026-05-22
SANDERS ADAM
Officer
$202,471
@ $379.16 · 2026-02-24
HILL BRICE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.81M
@ $361.21 · 2026-02-17
SANDERS ADAM
Officer
$155,620
@ $255.53 · 2025-12-01
LITTLE TERI A
Officer
$952,942
@ $238.24 · 2025-11-25
LITTLE TERI A
Officer
$936,321
@ $234.08 · 2025-11-19
SANDERS ADAM
Officer
$100,373
@ $178.60 · 2025-06-24
SANDERS ADAM
Officer
$65,174
@ $144.83 · 2025-04-01
SANDERS ADAM
Officer
$46,808
@ $172.72 · 2025-02-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
AMD
9
Sells (3M)
32
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $311.93M
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.22M
@ $536.33 · 2026-06-15
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$57.59M
@ $460.69 · 2026-06-10
DENZEL NORA M
Director
$5.45M
@ $522.00 · 2026-06-02
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$8.41M
@ $431.40 · 2026-05-20
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$55.69M
@ $445.51 · 2026-05-13
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$10.83M
@ $444.39 · 2026-05-08
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$10.96M
@ $350.00 · 2026-04-24
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$8.99M
@ $271.47 · 2026-04-16
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$740,925
@ $225.00 · 2026-04-06
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$16.90M
@ $198.77 · 2026-03-12
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$1.54M
@ $204.87 · 2026-03-11
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$606,800
@ $200.00 · 2026-03-04
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$56,814
@ $198.65 · 2026-02-18
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$4.02M
@ $201.62 · 2026-02-17
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$4.22M
@ $216.81 · 2026-02-11
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$26.79M
@ $214.36 · 2026-02-11
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$572,454
@ $234.42 · 2026-01-16
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$26.89M
@ $215.14 · 2025-12-11
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$2.19M
@ $218.77 · 2025-12-04
HU JEAN X
Chief Financial Officer
$3.05M
@ $209.96 · 2025-11-24
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$4.46M
@ $229.37 · 2025-11-19
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$4.11M
@ $240.12 · 2025-11-14
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.77M
@ $224.28 · 2025-10-15
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$648,197
@ $226.01 · 2025-10-06
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$371,272
@ $165.01 · 2025-09-24
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.67M
@ $159.20 · 2025-09-15
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$2.77M
@ $160.93 · 2025-09-10
HAHN AVA M
General Counsel
$22,608
@ $158.10 · 2025-09-02
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$36.89M
@ $163.97 · 2025-08-21
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.99M
@ $178.11 · 2025-08-15
GRASBY PAUL DARREN
Officer
$1.73M
@ $173.21 · 2025-08-12
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.79M
@ $155.03 · 2025-07-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.03M
@ $116.00 · 2025-06-13
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.04M
@ $116.59 · 2025-05-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.67M
@ $95.47 · 2025-04-15
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.75M
@ $100.27 · 2025-03-14
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.99M
@ $113.57 · 2025-02-14
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$10.91M
@ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$10.91M
@ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$11.51M
@ $143.87 · 2024-11-06
NORROD FORREST EUGENE
Officer
$5.74M
@ $141.67 · 2024-11-05
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$11.58M
@ $144.72 · 2024-09-11
SU LISA T
Chief Executive Officer
$12.60M
@ $157.44 · 2024-08-20
PAPERMASTER MARK D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.09M
@ $184.50 · 2024-07-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AMAT
FearGreed
😏Greed(71/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
AMD
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AMAT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (71)
AMD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
View AMAT Full AnalysisView AMD Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AMAT vs AMD

Is Applied Materials, Inc. or Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AMAT trades at a 7.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $664 vs. price $617), compared to AMD's -144.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $219 vs. $537).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Applied Materials, Inc. or Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.?

AMAT scores 93/100 (Wide moat), while AMD scores 41/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Applied Materials, Inc. or Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.?

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) generates a 1.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s 0.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Applied Materials, Inc. or Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.?

AMAT earns 23.5% ROIC versus AMD's 6.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.