Compare Stocks › ALLE vs MS

Allegion plc (ALLE) vs Morgan Stanley (MS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, ALLE is fairly valued at $186, with a DCF intrinsic value of $192 and a margin of safety of 3%. MS is undervalued at $184, with an intrinsic value of $314 and a margin of safety of 41%. Of the two, MS has the wider margin of safety.

ALLE
Allegion plc
$186.44
VS
MS
Morgan Stanley
$184.30

Rewards

ALLE
  • ★Allegion plc has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Allegion plc scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 20.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
MS
  • ★Gross margin of 87.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

ALLE
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.10 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $2.2M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
MS
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • ⚠13 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ALLE
MS
Valuation
$580.99M
Free Cash Flow
N/A
3.66%
FCF Yield
N/A
23.19
Trailing P/E
14.62
18.35
Forward P/E
13.50
Quality & Moat
19.13%
ROIC
3.47%
33.56%
ROE
13.84%
45.09%
Gross Margin
87.31%
2.10
PEG Ratio
1.61
Balance Sheet Safety
0.85
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.67
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
1.18%
Dividend Yield
2.50%
ALLE: 2Ties: 1MS: 6
ALLEMS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ALLE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ALLE
$3.48
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.28B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ALLE
3.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 3.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $186.44
Fair Value: $192.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MS
41.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 41.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $184.30
Fair Value: $313.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ALLE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $186?

+11.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.4%

The market implies +11.3% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +13.4%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ALLE
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ALLE
-2.49
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ALLE
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 104.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,078
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MS
Insiders 24.4%Institutions 63.5%Retail & Other 12.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,458
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ALLE
1
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $590,828
MIZELL STEVEN
Director
$26,908
@ $158.28 · 2026-08-28
MAIN SUSAN L
Director
$299,215
@ $149.61 · 2026-03-11
PETERS LAUREN B
Director
$264,705
@ $165.44 · 2025-11-25
SENGSTACK GREGG C
Director
$1.00M
@ $125.24 · 2025-02-19
STONE JOHN H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.06M
@ $140.70 · 2024-12-03
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ALLE
4
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.56M
ECKERSLEY TIMOTHY P
Officer
$1.14M
@ $178.62 · 2026-10-26
KEMP TRACY L
Chief Technology Officer
$799,080
@ $178.81 · 2026-10-26
ILARDI DAVID S.
Officer
$88,438
@ $161.09 · 2026-08-18
WENOS VINCENT
Officer
$168,250
@ $168.25 · 2026-08-06
ECKERSLEY TIMOTHY P
Officer
$1.01M
@ $157.26 · 2026-07-27
MUSIAL NICKOLAS A.
Officer
$106,485
@ $155.00 · 2026-07-23
WAGNES MICHAEL J.
Chief Financial Officer
$480,720
@ $150.98 · 2026-07-23
MARTENS ROBERT C
Officer
$547,640
@ $137.15 · 2026-05-07
MIZELL STEVEN
Director
$227,026
@ $162.16 · 2026-02-19
ECKERSLEY TIMOTHY P
Officer
$1.78M
@ $164.76 · 2025-08-07
KEMP TRACY L
Chief Technology Officer
$634,786
@ $164.92 · 2025-07-25
WENOS VINCENT
Chief Technology Officer
$136,342
@ $141.88 · 2025-05-09
KEMP TRACY L
Chief Technology Officer
$257,541
@ $126.74 · 2025-03-11
BRAUN JEFFREY N
General Counsel
$271,788
@ $134.68 · 2025-03-10
ILARDI DAVID S.
Officer
$98,846
@ $125.28 · 2025-03-04
MUSIAL NICKOLAS A.
Officer
$50,254
@ $124.70 · 2025-02-19
KEMP TRACY L
Chief Technology Officer
$343,933
@ $139.47 · 2024-12-02
ECKERSLEY TIMOTHY P
Officer
$2.09M
@ $142.20 · 2024-11-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MS
0
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $48.28M
SCHAPIRO MARY L
Director
$212,055
@ $212.06 · 2026-07-28
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$5.21M
@ $215.55 · 2026-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ALLE
FearGreed
😏Greed(71/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ALLE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (71)
MS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View ALLE Full AnalysisView MS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ALLE vs MS

Is Allegion plc or Morgan Stanley more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MS trades at a 41.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $314 vs. price $184), compared to ALLE's 3.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $192 vs. $186).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Allegion plc or Morgan Stanley?▼

ALLE scores 91/100 (Wide moat), while MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?▼

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ALLE scores 4.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Allegion plc or Morgan Stanley?▼

ALLE earns 19.1% ROIC versus MS's 3.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Allegion plc's or Morgan Stanley's?▼

ALLE's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MS's 79/100 (Safe). ALLE has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.