Compare StocksALB vs UNH

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH)

ALB
Albemarle Corporation
$193.88
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$368.78

Rewards

ALB
    UNH
    • Dividend yield of 2.40% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

    Risks

    ALB
    • ROIC has declined by 16.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 13.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Albemarle Corporation scores only 2/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    UNH
    • ROIC has declined by 7.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ALB
    UNH
    Valuation
    $692.47M
    Free Cash Flow
    $17.69B
    3.03%
    FCF Yield
    5.28%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    27.85
    21.48
    Forward P/E
    17.77
    Quality & Moat
    0.70%
    ROIC
    15.60%
    -6.93%
    ROE
    11.45%
    13.10%
    Gross Margin
    18.80%
    1.38
    PEG Ratio
    39.79
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.34
    Debt / Equity
    0.74
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.31
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.18
    0.84%
    Dividend Yield
    2.40%
    ALB: 2Ties: 1UNH: 8
    ALBUNH

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ALB

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    UNH

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ALB
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-972.3M
    Δ Market Cap
    $-8.76B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    UNH
    $-7.37
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $26.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-196.16B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ALB
    156.9% Overvalued
    Price is 156.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $193.88
    Fair Value: $75.48
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    UNH
    9.6% Overvalued
    Price is 9.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $368.78
    Fair Value: $336.33
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ALB

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $194?

    +15.5%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    UNH

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $369?

    +13.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +8.7%

    The market implies +13.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ALB
    2/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    UNH
    64/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ALB
    -3.60
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    UNH
    -2.45
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ALB
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 85.9%Retail & Other 13.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,253
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    UNH
    Insiders 0.8%Institutions 84.7%Retail & Other 14.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,077
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ALB
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $17,869
    WOLFF ALEJANDRO DANIEL
    Director
    $17,869
    @ $74.15 · 2025-10-01
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    UNH
    0
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $31.61M
    HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $25.02M
    @ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
    REX JOHN F
    President
    $5.00M
    @ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
    GIL KRISTEN
    Director
    $1.00M
    @ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
    NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
    Director
    $93,647
    @ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
    FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
    Director
    $491,786
    @ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
    FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
    Director
    $511,575
    @ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ALB
    3
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.37M
    MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.01M
    @ $170.81 · 2026-03-10
    NORRIS ERIC S.
    Officer
    $941,741
    @ $165.45 · 2026-02-20
    ANDERSON MELISSA HANFT
    Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $163.71 · 2026-02-13
    KRUPA ANDER C
    General Counsel
    $18,060
    @ $105.00 · 2025-10-24
    KRUPA ANDER C
    General Counsel
    $11,020
    @ $95.00 · 2025-10-09
    MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $255,328
    @ $101.12 · 2024-12-05
    JOHNSON NETHA N
    Chief Operating Officer
    $112,403
    @ $106.04 · 2024-11-19
    MUMMERT MARK RICHARD
    Officer
    $114,250
    @ $135.53 · 2024-05-14
    BARICHIVICH JOHN CLARENCE III
    Officer
    $194,951
    @ $132.17 · 2024-05-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    UNH
    1
    Sells (3M)
    2
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $463,645
    CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
    Officer
    $284,000
    @ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
    CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $179,645
    @ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ALB
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(59/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    UNH
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ALB
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
    UNH
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    View ALB Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis