Compare Stocks › ALB vs JNJ

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) vs Johnson & Johnson (JNJ): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, ALB is overvalued at $91, with a DCF intrinsic value of $70 and a margin of safety of -29%. JNJ is overvalued at $273, with an intrinsic value of $203 and a margin of safety of -35%. Of the two, ALB has the wider margin of safety.

ALB
Albemarle Corporation
$91.00
VS
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
$273.20

Rewards

ALB
  • ★FCF yield of 12.4% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.79 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
JNJ
  • ★Johnson & Johnson has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 67.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Johnson & Johnson scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

ALB
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 18.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Gross margin of 24.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Albemarle Corporation scores only 2/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
JNJ
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 41.5x is 108% above the historical average of 20.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 3.07 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ALB
JNJ
Valuation
$1.33B
Free Cash Flow
$18.50B
12.43%
FCF Yield
2.81%
337.04
Trailing P/E
41.46
8.71
Forward P/E
23.52
Quality & Moat
10.32%
ROIC
16.01%
2.65%
ROE
20.02%
23.96%
Gross Margin
67.77%
0.79
PEG Ratio
3.07
Balance Sheet Safety
0.03
Net Debt / Equity
0.34
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.25
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.79
1.80%
Dividend Yield
1.96%
ALB: 5Ties: 1JNJ: 6
ALBJNJ

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ALB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

JNJ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ALB
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-972.3M
Δ Market Cap
$-8.76B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
JNJ
$0.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$40.05B
Δ Market Cap
+$36.63B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ALB
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $91.00
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
JNJ
34.7% Overvalued
Price is 34.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $273.20
Fair Value: $202.84
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ALB

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $91?

-4.5%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

JNJ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $273?

+9.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.1%

The market implies +9.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +16.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ALB
2/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
JNJ
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ALB
-1.20
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
JNJ
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ALB
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 102.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,282
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
JNJ
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.8%Retail & Other 23.2%
No. of Institutional Holders5,842
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ALB
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
WOLFF ALEJANDRO DANIEL
Director
$17,869
@ $74.15 · 2025-10-01
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
JNJ
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $257,688
MORIKIS JOHN G
Director
$257,688
@ $206.15 · 2025-11-26
WEINBERGER MARK A
Director
$147,220
@ $147.22 · 2024-12-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ALB
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.35M
MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
Chief Executive Officer
$3.01M
@ $183.72 · 2026-05-15
MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.01M
@ $170.81 · 2026-03-10
NORRIS ERIC S.
Officer
$941,741
@ $165.45 · 2026-02-20
ANDERSON MELISSA HANFT
Officer
$1.38M
@ $163.71 · 2026-02-13
KRUPA ANDER C
General Counsel
$18,060
@ $105.00 · 2025-10-24
KRUPA ANDER C
General Counsel
$11,020
@ $95.00 · 2025-10-09
MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
Chief Executive Officer
$255,328
@ $101.12 · 2024-12-05
JOHNSON NETHA N
Chief Operating Officer
$112,403
@ $106.04 · 2024-11-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
JNJ
5
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $128.54M
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$9.23M
@ $274.74 · 2026-09-02
TAUBERT JENNIFER L
Officer
$3.95M
@ $263.36 · 2026-08-17
DUATO JOAQUIN BOIX
Chief Executive Officer
$32.20M
@ $261.17 · 2026-08-13
FORMINARD ELIZABETH
Officer
$4.09M
@ $257.00 · 2026-08-06
DUATO JOAQUIN BOIX
Chief Executive Officer
$12.52M
@ $258.15 · 2026-08-05
BROADHURST VANESSA
Officer
$5.79M
@ $251.27 · 2026-07-20
WENGEL KATHRYN E
Chief Technology Officer
$2.41M
@ $241.15 · 2026-06-11
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$1.01M
@ $247.87 · 2026-02-27
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$324,763
@ $245.66 · 2026-02-20
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$5.53M
@ $244.33 · 2026-02-18
BROADHURST VANESSA
Officer
$1.51M
@ $243.39 · 2026-02-17
SWANSON JAMES D
Chief Technology Officer
$15.11M
@ $243.39 · 2026-02-17
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$21.77M
@ $242.80 · 2026-02-17
REED JOHN C
Officer
$13.11M
@ $243.00 · 2026-02-17
REED JOHN C
Officer
$4.19M
@ $192.71 · 2025-10-17
TAUBERT JENNIFER L
Officer
$10.04M
@ $177.81 · 2025-09-04
DUATO JOAQUIN BOIX
Chief Executive Officer
$22.55M
@ $179.21 · 2025-08-22
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.98M
@ $176.91 · 2025-08-15
REED JOHN C
Officer
$3.13M
@ $163.55 · 2025-07-17
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$1.16M
@ $165.88 · 2025-02-25
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$62,928
@ $156.15 · 2025-02-18
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $153.89 · 2025-02-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ALB
FearGreed
😨Fear(33/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
JNJ
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ALB
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
JNJ
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
View ALB Full AnalysisView JNJ Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ALB vs JNJ

Is Albemarle Corporation or Johnson & Johnson more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ALB trades at a -29.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $70 vs. price $91), compared to JNJ's -34.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $203 vs. $273).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Albemarle Corporation or Johnson & Johnson?▼

JNJ scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while ALB scores 2/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Albemarle Corporation in financial distress?▼

ALB's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. JNJ scores 3.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Albemarle Corporation or Johnson & Johnson?▼

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) generates a 12.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Johnson & Johnson's 2.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Albemarle Corporation or Johnson & Johnson?▼

JNJ earns 16.0% ROIC versus ALB's 10.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Albemarle Corporation's or Johnson & Johnson's?▼

JNJ's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to ALB's 74/100 (Safe). JNJ has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Does Albemarle Corporation have accounting red flags?▼

ALB's Beneish M-Score of -1.2 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, JNJ scores -2.3, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.

ALB vs JNJ: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io