Compare StocksALB vs GOOGL

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ALB is overvalued at $160, with a DCF intrinsic value of $66 and a margin of safety of -144%. GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with an intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. Of the two, ALB has the wider margin of safety.

ALB
Albemarle Corporation
$160.35
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03

Rewards

ALB
    GOOGL
    • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    ALB
    • ROIC has declined by 18.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 18.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Albemarle Corporation scores only 2/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    GOOGL
    • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ALB
    GOOGL
    Valuation
    $716.71M
    Free Cash Flow
    $73.27B
    3.79%
    FCF Yield
    1.63%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    28.09
    13.28
    Forward P/E
    25.39
    Quality & Moat
    8.88%
    ROIC
    20.98%
    -1.82%
    ROE
    38.88%
    18.53%
    Gross Margin
    60.37%
    1.02
    PEG Ratio
    1.47
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.09
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.19
    0.98%
    Dividend Yield
    0.24%
    ALB: 4Ties: 1GOOGL: 6
    ALBGOOGL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ALB

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ALB
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-972.3M
    Δ Market Cap
    $-8.76B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ALB
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $160.35
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    GOOGL
    289.6% Overvalued
    Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $368.03
    Fair Value: $94.46
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ALB

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $160?

    +12.1%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    GOOGL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

    +22.9%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ALB
    2/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ALB
    -1.20
    Likely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ALB
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 96.4%Retail & Other 3.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,339
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,263
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ALB
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $17,869
    WOLFF ALEJANDRO DANIEL
    Director
    $17,869
    @ $74.15 · 2025-10-01
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ALB
    1
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.38M
    MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.01M
    @ $183.72 · 2026-05-15
    MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.01M
    @ $170.81 · 2026-03-10
    NORRIS ERIC S.
    Officer
    $941,741
    @ $165.45 · 2026-02-20
    ANDERSON MELISSA HANFT
    Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $163.71 · 2026-02-13
    KRUPA ANDER C
    General Counsel
    $18,060
    @ $105.00 · 2025-10-24
    KRUPA ANDER C
    General Counsel
    $11,020
    @ $95.00 · 2025-10-09
    MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $255,328
    @ $101.12 · 2024-12-05
    JOHNSON NETHA N
    Chief Operating Officer
    $112,403
    @ $106.04 · 2024-11-19
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ALB
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(45/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(58/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ALB
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
    GOOGL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
    View ALB Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: ALB vs GOOGL

    Is Albemarle Corporation or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, ALB trades at a -144.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $66 vs. price $160), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Albemarle Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while ALB scores 2/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ALB scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Albemarle Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?

    Albemarle Corporation (ALB) generates a 3.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Albemarle Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?

    GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus ALB's 8.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Albemarle Corporation's or Alphabet Inc.'s?

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to ALB's 74/100 (Safe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    Does Albemarle Corporation have accounting red flags?

    ALB's Beneish M-Score of -1.2 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, GOOGL scores -2.9, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.