Compare StocksALB vs CRM

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) vs Salesforce, Inc. (CRM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ALB is overvalued at $160, with a DCF intrinsic value of $66 and a margin of safety of -144%. CRM is undervalued at $152, with an intrinsic value of $274 and a margin of safety of 45%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

ALB
Albemarle Corporation
$160.35
VS
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$151.78

Rewards

ALB
    CRM
    • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    ALB
    • ROIC has declined by 18.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 18.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Albemarle Corporation scores only 2/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    CRM

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      ALB
      CRM
      Valuation
      $716.71M
      Free Cash Flow
      $16.55B
      3.79%
      FCF Yield
      13.32%
      N/A
      Trailing P/E
      17.57
      13.28
      Forward P/E
      9.77
      Quality & Moat
      8.88%
      ROIC
      9.61%
      -1.82%
      ROE
      16.91%
      18.53%
      Gross Margin
      77.64%
      1.02
      PEG Ratio
      0.77
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.09
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.90
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      0.86
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      2.38
      0.98%
      Dividend Yield
      1.09%
      ALB: 2Ties: 1CRM: 8
      ALBCRM

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      ALB

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      CRM

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      ALB
      N/A
      Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
      Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
      Σ Retained
      $-972.3M
      Δ Market Cap
      $-8.76B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      CRM
      $-7.99
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $14.67B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-117.14B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      ALB
      Insufficient Data
      Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
      Current Price: $160.35
      Fair Value: $0.00
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      CRM
      44.5% Margin of Safety
      Price is 44.5% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $151.78
      Fair Value: $273.71
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      ALB

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $160?

      +12.1%
      Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

      Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

      CRM

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $152?

      +3.6%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies -2.8%

      The market implies +3.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

      Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      ALB
      2/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      CRM
      58/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      ALB
      -1.20
      Likely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      CRM
      -2.73
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      ALB
      Insiders 0.2%Institutions 96.4%Retail & Other 3.4%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,339
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      CRM
      Insiders 3.0%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 2.8%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,722
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      ALB
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $17,869
      WOLFF ALEJANDRO DANIEL
      Director
      $17,869
      @ $74.15 · 2025-10-01
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      CRM
      0
      Buys (3M)
      5
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $27.38M
      ALBER LAURA
      Director
      $500,266
      @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
      KIRK DAVID BLAIR
      Director
      $500,178
      @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
      KIRK DAVID BLAIR
      Director
      $500,722
      @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
      MORFIT G MASON
      Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
      $25.02M
      @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
      KIRK DAVID BLAIR
      Director
      $865,827
      @ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      ALB
      1
      Sells (3M)
      6
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $7.38M
      MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
      Chief Executive Officer
      $3.01M
      @ $183.72 · 2026-05-15
      MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
      Chief Executive Officer
      $2.01M
      @ $170.81 · 2026-03-10
      NORRIS ERIC S.
      Officer
      $941,741
      @ $165.45 · 2026-02-20
      ANDERSON MELISSA HANFT
      Officer
      $1.38M
      @ $163.71 · 2026-02-13
      KRUPA ANDER C
      General Counsel
      $18,060
      @ $105.00 · 2025-10-24
      KRUPA ANDER C
      General Counsel
      $11,020
      @ $95.00 · 2025-10-09
      MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
      Chief Executive Officer
      $255,328
      @ $101.12 · 2024-12-05
      JOHNSON NETHA N
      Chief Operating Officer
      $112,403
      @ $106.04 · 2024-11-19
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      CRM
      0
      Sells (3M)
      15
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $40.30M
      KROES NEELIE
      Director
      $929,276
      @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
      HARRIS G PARKER
      Officer and Director
      $31.61M
      @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $575,140
      @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $590,102
      @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $567,631
      @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $550,430
      @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $558,810
      @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $536,322
      @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $548,796
      @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.10M
      @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $547,344
      @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $539,533
      @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $555,001
      @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $552,798
      @ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $545,384
      @ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      ALB
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(45/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      CRM
      FearGreed
      🥶Extreme Fear(18/100)

      "Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      ALB
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
      CRM
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (18)
      View ALB Full AnalysisView CRM Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: ALB vs CRM

      Is Albemarle Corporation or Salesforce, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 44.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $274 vs. price $152), compared to ALB's -144.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $66 vs. $160).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Albemarle Corporation or Salesforce, Inc.?

      CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat), while ALB scores 2/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Albemarle Corporation in financial distress?

      ALB's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CRM scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Albemarle Corporation or Salesforce, Inc.?

      Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 13.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Albemarle Corporation's 3.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Albemarle Corporation or Salesforce, Inc.?

      CRM earns 9.6% ROIC versus ALB's 8.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Albemarle Corporation's or Salesforce, Inc.'s?

      CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to ALB's 74/100 (Safe). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

      Does Albemarle Corporation have accounting red flags?

      ALB's Beneish M-Score of -1.2 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, CRM scores -2.7, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.