Compare StocksALB vs BAC

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, ALB is overvalued at $114, with a DCF intrinsic value of $70 and a margin of safety of -63%. BAC is undervalued at $58, with an intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

ALB
Albemarle Corporation
$114.28
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$57.73

Rewards

ALB
  • FCF yield of 9.9% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • PEG ratio of 0.79 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

ALB
  • ROIC has declined by 18.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 24.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Albemarle Corporation scores only 2/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ALB
BAC
Valuation
$1.33B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
9.89%
FCF Yield
N/A
423.28
Trailing P/E
13.33
10.12
Forward P/E
10.91
Quality & Moat
10.32%
ROIC
4.37%
2.65%
ROE
11.20%
23.96%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.79
PEG Ratio
0.90
Balance Sheet Safety
0.03
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.25
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
1.50%
Dividend Yield
2.21%
ALB: 4Ties: 1BAC: 3
ALBBAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ALB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ALB
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-972.3M
Δ Market Cap
$-8.76B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ALB
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $114.28
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BAC
59.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.73
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ALB

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $114?

-1.3%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ALB
2/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ALB
-1.20
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ALB
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 101.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,312
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ALB
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $17,869
WOLFF ALEJANDRO DANIEL
Director
$17,869
@ $74.15 · 2025-10-01
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ALB
0
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.38M
MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
Chief Executive Officer
$3.01M
@ $183.72 · 2026-05-15
MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.01M
@ $170.81 · 2026-03-10
NORRIS ERIC S.
Officer
$941,741
@ $165.45 · 2026-02-20
ANDERSON MELISSA HANFT
Officer
$1.38M
@ $163.71 · 2026-02-13
KRUPA ANDER C
General Counsel
$18,060
@ $105.00 · 2025-10-24
KRUPA ANDER C
General Counsel
$11,020
@ $95.00 · 2025-10-09
MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
Chief Executive Officer
$255,328
@ $101.12 · 2024-12-05
JOHNSON NETHA N
Chief Operating Officer
$112,403
@ $106.04 · 2024-11-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ALB
FearGreed
😨Fear(32/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ALB
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
View ALB Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ALB vs BAC

Is Albemarle Corporation or Bank of America Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to ALB's -62.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $70 vs. $114).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Albemarle Corporation or Bank of America Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while ALB scores 2/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ALB scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Albemarle Corporation or Bank of America Corporation?

ALB earns 10.3% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Albemarle Corporation's or Bank of America Corporation's?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to ALB's 74/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Does Albemarle Corporation have accounting red flags?

ALB's Beneish M-Score of -1.2 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, BAC scores -2.3, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.

ALB vs BAC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io