Compare StocksALB vs BAC

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ALB is overvalued at $160, with a DCF intrinsic value of $66 and a margin of safety of -144%. BAC is undervalued at $56, with an intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

ALB
Albemarle Corporation
$160.35
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20

Rewards

ALB
    BAC
    • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    ALB
    • ROIC has declined by 18.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 18.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Albemarle Corporation scores only 2/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    BAC
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ALB
    BAC
    Valuation
    $716.71M
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    3.79%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    13.95
    13.28
    Forward P/E
    11.13
    Quality & Moat
    8.88%
    ROIC
    3.89%
    -1.82%
    ROE
    10.64%
    18.53%
    Gross Margin
    0.00%
    1.02
    PEG Ratio
    1.02
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.09
    Net Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    0.98%
    Dividend Yield
    1.97%
    ALB: 2Ties: 2BAC: 3
    ALBBAC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ALB

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    BAC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ALB
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-972.3M
    Δ Market Cap
    $-8.76B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    BAC
    $2.37
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $55.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$131.83B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ALB
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $160.35
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    BAC
    57.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $56.20
    Fair Value: $133.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ALB

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $160?

    +12.1%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    BAC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ALB
    2/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    BAC
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ALB
    -1.20
    Likely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    BAC
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ALB
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 96.4%Retail & Other 3.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,339
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    BAC
    Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,373
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ALB
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $17,869
    WOLFF ALEJANDRO DANIEL
    Director
    $17,869
    @ $74.15 · 2025-10-01
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    BAC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ALB
    1
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.38M
    MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.01M
    @ $183.72 · 2026-05-15
    MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.01M
    @ $170.81 · 2026-03-10
    NORRIS ERIC S.
    Officer
    $941,741
    @ $165.45 · 2026-02-20
    ANDERSON MELISSA HANFT
    Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $163.71 · 2026-02-13
    KRUPA ANDER C
    General Counsel
    $18,060
    @ $105.00 · 2025-10-24
    KRUPA ANDER C
    General Counsel
    $11,020
    @ $95.00 · 2025-10-09
    MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $255,328
    @ $101.12 · 2024-12-05
    JOHNSON NETHA N
    Chief Operating Officer
    $112,403
    @ $106.04 · 2024-11-19
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    BAC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $20.17M
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $4.41M
    @ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
    SCRIVENER THOMAS M
    Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
    BRONSTEIN SHERI B
    Officer
    $2.99M
    @ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
    ATHANASIA DEAN C
    President
    $6.86M
    @ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
    BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.42M
    @ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $3.66M
    @ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
    HANS LINDSAY D
    Officer
    $402,410
    @ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ALB
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(45/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    BAC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ALB
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
    BAC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    View ALB Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: ALB vs BAC

    Is Albemarle Corporation or Bank of America Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to ALB's -144.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $66 vs. $160).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Albemarle Corporation or Bank of America Corporation?

    BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while ALB scores 2/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

    BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ALB scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Albemarle Corporation or Bank of America Corporation?

    ALB earns 8.9% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Albemarle Corporation's or Bank of America Corporation's?

    BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to ALB's 74/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    Does Albemarle Corporation have accounting red flags?

    ALB's Beneish M-Score of -1.2 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, BAC scores -2.3, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.