Compare StocksALB vs AMD

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) vs Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ALB is overvalued at $160, with a DCF intrinsic value of $66 and a margin of safety of -144%. AMD is overvalued at $537, with an intrinsic value of $219 and a margin of safety of -145%. Of the two, ALB has the wider margin of safety.

ALB
Albemarle Corporation
$160.35
VS
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$537.37

Rewards

ALB
    AMD
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 29.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.01 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
    • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

    Risks

    ALB
    • ROIC has declined by 18.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 18.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Albemarle Corporation scores only 2/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    AMD
    • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
    • FCF yield of 0.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • Trailing P/E of 179.7x is 30% above the historical average of 138.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ALB
    AMD
    Valuation
    $716.71M
    Free Cash Flow
    $7.17B
    3.79%
    FCF Yield
    0.82%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    179.72
    13.28
    Forward P/E
    41.01
    Quality & Moat
    8.88%
    ROIC
    6.23%
    -1.82%
    ROE
    8.06%
    18.53%
    Gross Margin
    53.06%
    1.02
    PEG Ratio
    1.22
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.09
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -1.14
    0.98%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    ALB: 5Ties: 1AMD: 5
    ALBAMD

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ALB

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    AMD

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ALB
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-972.3M
    Δ Market Cap
    $-8.76B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    AMD
    $35.82
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $6.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$244.67B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ALB
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $160.35
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    AMD
    78.1% Overvalued
    Price is 78.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $537.37
    Fair Value: $301.68
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ALB

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $160?

    +12.1%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    AMD

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $537?

    +34.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +32.6%

    The market implies +34.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +32.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ALB
    2/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    AMD
    41/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ALB
    -1.20
    Likely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    AMD
    -2.84
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ALB
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 96.4%Retail & Other 3.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,339
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    AMD
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 72.2%Retail & Other 27.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,190
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ALB
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $17,869
    WOLFF ALEJANDRO DANIEL
    Director
    $17,869
    @ $74.15 · 2025-10-01
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    AMD
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    GUIDO PHILIP
    Officer
    $999,328
    @ $113.56 · 2025-05-20
    GUIDO PHILIP
    Officer
    $499,616
    @ $107.56 · 2025-02-07
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ALB
    1
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.38M
    MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.01M
    @ $183.72 · 2026-05-15
    MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.01M
    @ $170.81 · 2026-03-10
    NORRIS ERIC S.
    Officer
    $941,741
    @ $165.45 · 2026-02-20
    ANDERSON MELISSA HANFT
    Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $163.71 · 2026-02-13
    KRUPA ANDER C
    General Counsel
    $18,060
    @ $105.00 · 2025-10-24
    KRUPA ANDER C
    General Counsel
    $11,020
    @ $95.00 · 2025-10-09
    MASTERS JERRY KENT JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $255,328
    @ $101.12 · 2024-12-05
    JOHNSON NETHA N
    Chief Operating Officer
    $112,403
    @ $106.04 · 2024-11-19
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    AMD
    8
    Sells (3M)
    31
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $308.72M
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $57.59M
    @ $460.69 · 2026-06-10
    DENZEL NORA M
    Director
    $5.45M
    @ $522.00 · 2026-06-02
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $8.41M
    @ $431.40 · 2026-05-20
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $55.69M
    @ $445.51 · 2026-05-13
    GRASBY PAUL DARREN
    Officer
    $10.83M
    @ $444.39 · 2026-05-08
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $10.96M
    @ $350.00 · 2026-04-24
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $8.99M
    @ $271.47 · 2026-04-16
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $740,925
    @ $225.00 · 2026-04-06
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.90M
    @ $198.77 · 2026-03-12
    GRASBY PAUL DARREN
    Officer
    $1.54M
    @ $204.87 · 2026-03-11
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $606,800
    @ $200.00 · 2026-03-04
    HAHN AVA M
    General Counsel
    $56,814
    @ $198.65 · 2026-02-18
    HU JEAN X
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.02M
    @ $201.62 · 2026-02-17
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $26.79M
    @ $214.36 · 2026-02-11
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $4.22M
    @ $216.81 · 2026-02-11
    HAHN AVA M
    General Counsel
    $572,454
    @ $234.42 · 2026-01-16
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $26.89M
    @ $215.14 · 2025-12-11
    GRASBY PAUL DARREN
    Officer
    $2.19M
    @ $218.77 · 2025-12-04
    HU JEAN X
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.05M
    @ $209.96 · 2025-11-24
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $4.46M
    @ $229.37 · 2025-11-19
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $4.11M
    @ $240.12 · 2025-11-14
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $3.77M
    @ $224.28 · 2025-10-15
    HAHN AVA M
    General Counsel
    $648,197
    @ $226.01 · 2025-10-06
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $371,272
    @ $165.01 · 2025-09-24
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.67M
    @ $159.20 · 2025-09-15
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $2.77M
    @ $160.93 · 2025-09-10
    HAHN AVA M
    General Counsel
    $22,608
    @ $158.10 · 2025-09-02
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $36.89M
    @ $163.97 · 2025-08-21
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.99M
    @ $178.11 · 2025-08-15
    GRASBY PAUL DARREN
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $173.21 · 2025-08-12
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.79M
    @ $155.03 · 2025-07-15
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $116.00 · 2025-06-13
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.04M
    @ $116.59 · 2025-05-15
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.67M
    @ $95.47 · 2025-04-15
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.75M
    @ $100.27 · 2025-03-14
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.99M
    @ $113.57 · 2025-02-14
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.91M
    @ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.91M
    @ $142.66 · 2024-12-04
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.51M
    @ $143.87 · 2024-11-06
    NORROD FORREST EUGENE
    Officer
    $5.74M
    @ $141.67 · 2024-11-05
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.58M
    @ $144.72 · 2024-09-11
    SU LISA T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $12.60M
    @ $157.44 · 2024-08-20
    PAPERMASTER MARK D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $3.09M
    @ $184.50 · 2024-07-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ALB
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(45/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    AMD
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(61/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ALB
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
    AMD
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
    View ALB Full AnalysisView AMD Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: ALB vs AMD

    Is Albemarle Corporation or Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, ALB trades at a -144.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $66 vs. price $160), compared to AMD's -144.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $219 vs. $537).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Albemarle Corporation or Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.?

    AMD scores 41/100 (Narrow moat), while ALB scores 2/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Albemarle Corporation in financial distress?

    ALB's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AMD scores 16.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Albemarle Corporation or Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.?

    Albemarle Corporation (ALB) generates a 3.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s 0.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Albemarle Corporation or Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.?

    ALB earns 8.9% ROIC versus AMD's 6.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Does Albemarle Corporation have accounting red flags?

    ALB's Beneish M-Score of -1.2 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, AMD scores -2.8, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.