Compare Stocks › AKAM vs QCOM
Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
$103.87
VS
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$177.03
Rewards
AKAM
QCOM
- ★QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
- ★QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
- ★Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
Risks
AKAM
- ⚠9 insider sales totaling $8.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
- ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 5.0% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
QCOM
- ⚠FCF yield of 6.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
- ⚠16 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →AKAM
QCOM
Valuation
$578.66M
Free Cash Flow
$12.82B
3.78%
FCF Yield
6.87%
33.83
Trailing P/E
19.06
13.66
Forward P/E
16.65
Quality & Moat
4.31%
ROIC
18.22%
9.08%
ROE
20.31%
58.95%
Gross Margin
54.80%
1.19
PEG Ratio
0.11
Balance Sheet Safety
1.14
Debt / Equity
0.56
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.80
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.42
N/A
Dividend Yield
2.08%
AKAM: 2Ties: 1QCOM: 8
AKAMQCOM
Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →AKAM
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
QCOM
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →AKAM
$-0.38
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.50B
Δ Market Cap
$-566.5M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →AKAM
113.2% Overvalued
Price is 113.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $103.87
Strongly undervalued
Fairly valued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $48.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
QCOM
135.1% Overvalued
Price is 135.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $177.03
Strongly undervalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $75.29
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →AKAM
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $104?
+18.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.0%
The market implies +18.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.
Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.
QCOM
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $177?
+15.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +3.8%
The market implies +15.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.
Standard FCF implies a demanding +3.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →AKAM
53/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →AKAM
-2.80
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →AKAM
Insiders 2.1%Institutions 97.7%Retail & Other 0.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,009
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 82.7%Retail & Other 17.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,708
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →AKAM
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.83M
HESSE DANIEL R
Director
$216,897
@ $72.30 · 2025-08-11
LEIGHTON F THOMSON
Chief Executive Officer
$3.61M
@ $72.26 · 2025-08-11
LEIGHTON F THOMSON
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $79.58 · 2025-02-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →AKAM
9
Sells (3M)
22
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $13.98M
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$531,256
@ $106.25 · 2026-03-16
KARON ADAM M
Officer
$1.83M
@ $107.43 · 2026-03-12
WILLIAMS ANTHONY P
Officer
$1.56M
@ $104.29 · 2026-03-11
MCGOWAN EDWARD J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.39M
@ $101.19 · 2026-03-10
RANGANATHAN MADHU
Director
$319,362
@ $102.00 · 2026-03-04
MILLER JONATHAN FRANK
Director
$1.13M
@ $102.67 · 2026-03-04
KARON ADAM M
Officer
$458,190
@ $96.91 · 2026-03-02
HOWELL LAURA
Officer
$1.13M
@ $100.14 · 2026-02-25
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$378,000
@ $108.00 · 2026-02-13
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$339,500
@ $97.00 · 2026-01-22
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$450,874
@ $90.17 · 2026-01-15
KARON ADAM M
Officer
$289,836
@ $87.30 · 2026-01-02
MCGOWAN EDWARD J
Chief Financial Officer
$577,477
@ $88.03 · 2025-12-15
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$438,451
@ $87.69 · 2025-11-17
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$263,051
@ $87.68 · 2025-11-14
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$301,000
@ $86.00 · 2025-11-07
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$383,250
@ $76.65 · 2025-09-15
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$231,000
@ $77.00 · 2025-08-22
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$388,700
@ $77.74 · 2025-07-15
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$253,714
@ $77.97 · 2025-06-12
SALEM-JACKSON KIM
Officer
$1.00M
@ $76.33 · 2025-05-27
KARON ADAM M
Officer
$333,863
@ $85.02 · 2025-05-08
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$333,480
@ $83.37 · 2025-03-18
WILLIAMS ANTHONY P
Officer
$780,805
@ $82.19 · 2025-03-17
KARON ADAM M
Officer
$811,943
@ $82.34 · 2025-03-11
MCGOWAN EDWARD J
Chief Financial Officer
$971,911
@ $82.34 · 2025-03-11
KARON ADAM M
Chief Operating Officer
$485,140
@ $86.20 · 2025-03-10
MCGOWAN EDWARD J
Chief Financial Officer
$402,305
@ $86.48 · 2025-03-10
KARON ADAM M
Chief Operating Officer
$517,632
@ $80.49 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
QCOM
3
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.70M
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$325,854
@ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$330,815
@ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$458,799
@ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$577,620
@ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.20M
@ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$2.83M
@ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$567,702
@ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.38M
@ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$522,808
@ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$122,463
@ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,610
@ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$537,560
@ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$486,965
@ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$120,808
@ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$465,846
@ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$91,442
@ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$119,900
@ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$235,262
@ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$523,292
@ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$130,074
@ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$509,397
@ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$3.28M
@ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$463,851
@ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$409,056
@ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$1.67M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.24M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$484,617
@ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$202,120
@ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$491,349
@ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.38M
@ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$313,779
@ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$539,157
@ $166.15 · 2024-10-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$497,848
@ $165.95 · 2024-10-01
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.36M
@ $169.80 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →AKAM
😐Neutral(49/100)
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
QCOM
😏Greed(63/100)
"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →AKAM
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
QCOM
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)