Compare Stocks › AKAM vs PFE

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, AKAM is overvalued at $93, with a DCF intrinsic value of $9 and a margin of safety of -913%. PFE is overvalued at $31, with an intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -36%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
$92.72
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$30.52

Rewards

AKAM
  • ★Market sentiment is in extreme fear territory (score: 25/100) — historically, periods of fear have often presented buying opportunities.
PFE
  • ★Gross margin of 74.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Insiders have bought $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.

Risks

AKAM
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 5.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • ⚠21 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
PFE
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 40.2x is 32% above the historical average of 30.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AKAM
PFE
Valuation
$710.06M
Free Cash Flow
$12.49B
5.33%
FCF Yield
7.18%
33.59
Trailing P/E
40.16
13.56
Forward P/E
10.57
Quality & Moat
1.85%
ROIC
9.42%
8.92%
ROE
5.01%
57.45%
Gross Margin
74.72%
1.08
PEG Ratio
13.98
Balance Sheet Safety
1.26
Net Debt / Equity
0.61
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
5.54
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.04
0.00%
Dividend Yield
5.64%
AKAM: 3Ties: 1PFE: 8
AKAMPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AKAM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AKAM
$-0.38
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.50B
Δ Market Cap
$-566.5M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AKAM
913.0% Overvalued
Price is 913.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $92.72
Fair Value: $9.15
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
36.1% Overvalued
Price is 36.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $30.52
Fair Value: $22.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AKAM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $93?

+18.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.9%

The market implies +18.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $31?

+7.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.3%

The market implies +7.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AKAM
53/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AKAM
-2.80
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AKAM
Insiders 2.1%Institutions 112.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,132
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.1%Retail & Other 30.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,681
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AKAM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
LEIGHTON F THOMSON
Chief Executive Officer
$3.61M
@ $72.26 · 2025-08-11
HESSE DANIEL R
Director
$216,897
@ $72.30 · 2025-08-11
LEIGHTON F THOMSON
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $79.58 · 2025-02-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
3
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.96M
BOURLA ALBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $26.34 · 2026-08-12
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$960,369
@ $25.52 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$998,821
@ $25.46 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AKAM
2
Sells (3M)
21
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.71M
SALEM-JACKSON KIM
Officer
$257,664
@ $128.00 · 2026-09-25
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$327,453
@ $105.63 · 2026-09-15
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$392,987
@ $126.77 · 2026-07-15
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$31,447
@ $129.41 · 2026-06-18
SALEM-JACKSON KIM
Officer
$311,811
@ $135.57 · 2026-06-10
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$531,256
@ $106.25 · 2026-03-16
KARON ADAM M
Officer
$1.83M
@ $107.43 · 2026-03-12
WILLIAMS ANTHONY P
Officer
$1.56M
@ $104.29 · 2026-03-11
MCGOWAN EDWARD J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.39M
@ $101.19 · 2026-03-10
RANGANATHAN MADHU
Director
$319,362
@ $102.00 · 2026-03-04
MILLER JONATHAN FRANK
Director
$1.13M
@ $102.67 · 2026-03-04
KARON ADAM M
Officer
$458,190
@ $96.91 · 2026-03-02
HOWELL LAURA
Officer
$1.13M
@ $100.14 · 2026-02-25
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$378,000
@ $108.00 · 2026-02-13
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$339,500
@ $97.00 · 2026-01-22
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$450,874
@ $90.17 · 2026-01-15
KARON ADAM M
Officer
$289,836
@ $87.30 · 2026-01-02
MCGOWAN EDWARD J
Chief Financial Officer
$577,477
@ $88.03 · 2025-12-15
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$438,451
@ $87.69 · 2025-11-17
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$263,051
@ $87.68 · 2025-11-14
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$301,000
@ $86.00 · 2025-11-07
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$383,250
@ $76.65 · 2025-09-15
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$231,000
@ $77.00 · 2025-08-22
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$388,700
@ $77.74 · 2025-07-15
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$253,714
@ $77.97 · 2025-06-12
SALEM-JACKSON KIM
Officer
$1.00M
@ $76.33 · 2025-05-27
KARON ADAM M
Officer
$333,863
@ $85.02 · 2025-05-08
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$333,480
@ $83.37 · 2025-03-18
WILLIAMS ANTHONY P
Officer
$780,805
@ $82.19 · 2025-03-17
MCGOWAN EDWARD J
Chief Financial Officer
$971,911
@ $82.34 · 2025-03-11
KARON ADAM M
Officer
$811,943
@ $82.34 · 2025-03-11
MCGOWAN EDWARD J
Chief Financial Officer
$402,305
@ $86.48 · 2025-03-10
KARON ADAM M
Chief Operating Officer
$485,140
@ $86.20 · 2025-03-10
KARON ADAM M
Chief Operating Officer
$517,632
@ $80.49 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $134,661
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$83,261
@ $25.40 · 2026-08-05
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AKAM
FearGreed
😨Fear(25/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AKAM
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
PFE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
View AKAM Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AKAM vs PFE

Is Akamai Technologies, Inc. or Pfizer Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a -36.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $22 vs. price $31), compared to AKAM's -913.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $9 vs. $93).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Akamai Technologies, Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?▼

AKAM scores 53/100 (Narrow moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?▼

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AKAM scores 2.3 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Akamai Technologies, Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?▼

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) generates a 7.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Akamai Technologies, Inc.'s 5.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Akamai Technologies, Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?▼

PFE earns 9.4% ROIC versus AKAM's 1.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.