Compare StocksAKAM vs GOOGL

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, AKAM is overvalued at $125, with a DCF intrinsic value of $28 and a margin of safety of -353%. GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with an intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. Of the two, GOOGL has the wider margin of safety.

AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
$124.91
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03

Rewards

AKAM
    GOOGL
    • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    AKAM
    • Trailing P/E of 42.2x is 46% above the historical average of 28.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.0% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    GOOGL
    • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    GOOGL
    Valuation
    $700.72M
    Free Cash Flow
    $73.27B
    3.86%
    FCF Yield
    1.63%
    42.20
    Trailing P/E
    28.09
    17.49
    Forward P/E
    25.39
    Quality & Moat
    3.32%
    ROIC
    20.98%
    9.17%
    ROE
    38.88%
    58.28%
    Gross Margin
    60.37%
    1.57
    PEG Ratio
    1.47
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.01
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    4.30
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.19
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    0.24%
    AKAM: 2Ties: 2GOOGL: 8
    AKAMGOOGL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AKAM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    $-0.38
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.50B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-566.5M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    353.4% Overvalued
    Price is 353.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $124.91
    Fair Value: $27.55
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    GOOGL
    289.6% Overvalued
    Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $368.03
    Fair Value: $94.46
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AKAM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $125?

    +20.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +14.5%

    The market implies +20.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    GOOGL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

    +22.9%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    53/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    -2.80
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    Insiders 2.1%Institutions 111.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,096
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,263
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.83M
    HESSE DANIEL R
    Director
    $216,897
    @ $72.30 · 2025-08-11
    LEIGHTON F THOMSON
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.61M
    @ $72.26 · 2025-08-11
    LEIGHTON F THOMSON
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $79.58 · 2025-02-27
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    1
    Sells (3M)
    20
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $12.70M
    SALEM-JACKSON KIM
    Officer
    $311,811
    @ $135.57 · 2026-06-10
    JOSEPH PAUL C
    Officer
    $531,256
    @ $106.25 · 2026-03-16
    KARON ADAM M
    Officer
    $1.83M
    @ $107.43 · 2026-03-12
    WILLIAMS ANTHONY P
    Officer
    $1.56M
    @ $104.29 · 2026-03-11
    MCGOWAN EDWARD J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.39M
    @ $101.19 · 2026-03-10
    RANGANATHAN MADHU
    Director
    $319,362
    @ $102.00 · 2026-03-04
    MILLER JONATHAN FRANK
    Director
    $1.13M
    @ $102.67 · 2026-03-04
    KARON ADAM M
    Officer
    $458,190
    @ $96.91 · 2026-03-02
    HOWELL LAURA
    Officer
    $1.13M
    @ $100.14 · 2026-02-25
    BLUMOFE ROBERT
    Chief Technology Officer
    $378,000
    @ $108.00 · 2026-02-13
    BLUMOFE ROBERT
    Chief Technology Officer
    $339,500
    @ $97.00 · 2026-01-22
    JOSEPH PAUL C
    Officer
    $450,874
    @ $90.17 · 2026-01-15
    KARON ADAM M
    Officer
    $289,836
    @ $87.30 · 2026-01-02
    MCGOWAN EDWARD J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $577,477
    @ $88.03 · 2025-12-15
    JOSEPH PAUL C
    Officer
    $438,451
    @ $87.69 · 2025-11-17
    BLUMOFE ROBERT
    Chief Technology Officer
    $263,051
    @ $87.68 · 2025-11-14
    BLUMOFE ROBERT
    Chief Technology Officer
    $301,000
    @ $86.00 · 2025-11-07
    JOSEPH PAUL C
    Officer
    $383,250
    @ $76.65 · 2025-09-15
    BLUMOFE ROBERT
    Chief Technology Officer
    $231,000
    @ $77.00 · 2025-08-22
    JOSEPH PAUL C
    Officer
    $388,700
    @ $77.74 · 2025-07-15
    BLUMOFE ROBERT
    Chief Technology Officer
    $253,714
    @ $77.97 · 2025-06-12
    SALEM-JACKSON KIM
    Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $76.33 · 2025-05-27
    KARON ADAM M
    Officer
    $333,863
    @ $85.02 · 2025-05-08
    JOSEPH PAUL C
    Officer
    $333,480
    @ $83.37 · 2025-03-18
    WILLIAMS ANTHONY P
    Officer
    $780,805
    @ $82.19 · 2025-03-17
    KARON ADAM M
    Officer
    $811,943
    @ $82.34 · 2025-03-11
    MCGOWAN EDWARD J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $971,911
    @ $82.34 · 2025-03-11
    KARON ADAM M
    Chief Operating Officer
    $485,140
    @ $86.20 · 2025-03-10
    MCGOWAN EDWARD J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $402,305
    @ $86.48 · 2025-03-10
    KARON ADAM M
    Chief Operating Officer
    $517,632
    @ $80.49 · 2025-03-04
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(33/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(58/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
    GOOGL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
    View AKAM Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: AKAM vs GOOGL

    Is Akamai Technologies, Inc. or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, GOOGL trades at a -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $94 vs. price $368), compared to AKAM's -353.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $28 vs. $125).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Akamai Technologies, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while AKAM scores 53/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Akamai Technologies, Inc. in financial distress?

    AKAM's Altman Z-Score of 2.3 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Akamai Technologies, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?

    Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) generates a 3.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Akamai Technologies, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?

    GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus AKAM's 3.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    AKAM vs GOOGL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io