Compare StocksAKAM vs BAC

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, AKAM is overvalued at $125, with a DCF intrinsic value of $28 and a margin of safety of -353%. BAC is undervalued at $56, with an intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
$124.91
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20

Rewards

AKAM
    BAC
    • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    AKAM
    • Trailing P/E of 42.2x is 46% above the historical average of 28.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.0% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    BAC
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    BAC
    Valuation
    $700.72M
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    3.86%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    42.20
    Trailing P/E
    13.95
    17.49
    Forward P/E
    11.13
    Quality & Moat
    3.32%
    ROIC
    3.89%
    9.17%
    ROE
    10.64%
    58.28%
    Gross Margin
    0.00%
    1.57
    PEG Ratio
    1.02
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.01
    Net Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    4.30
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    1.97%
    AKAM: 1Ties: 1BAC: 6
    AKAMBAC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AKAM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    BAC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    $-0.38
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.50B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-566.5M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    BAC
    $2.37
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $55.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$131.83B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    353.4% Overvalued
    Price is 353.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $124.91
    Fair Value: $27.55
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    BAC
    57.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $56.20
    Fair Value: $133.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AKAM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $125?

    +20.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +14.5%

    The market implies +20.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    BAC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    53/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    BAC
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    -2.80
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    BAC
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    Insiders 2.1%Institutions 111.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,096
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    BAC
    Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,373
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.83M
    HESSE DANIEL R
    Director
    $216,897
    @ $72.30 · 2025-08-11
    LEIGHTON F THOMSON
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.61M
    @ $72.26 · 2025-08-11
    LEIGHTON F THOMSON
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $79.58 · 2025-02-27
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    BAC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    1
    Sells (3M)
    20
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $12.70M
    SALEM-JACKSON KIM
    Officer
    $311,811
    @ $135.57 · 2026-06-10
    JOSEPH PAUL C
    Officer
    $531,256
    @ $106.25 · 2026-03-16
    KARON ADAM M
    Officer
    $1.83M
    @ $107.43 · 2026-03-12
    WILLIAMS ANTHONY P
    Officer
    $1.56M
    @ $104.29 · 2026-03-11
    MCGOWAN EDWARD J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.39M
    @ $101.19 · 2026-03-10
    RANGANATHAN MADHU
    Director
    $319,362
    @ $102.00 · 2026-03-04
    MILLER JONATHAN FRANK
    Director
    $1.13M
    @ $102.67 · 2026-03-04
    KARON ADAM M
    Officer
    $458,190
    @ $96.91 · 2026-03-02
    HOWELL LAURA
    Officer
    $1.13M
    @ $100.14 · 2026-02-25
    BLUMOFE ROBERT
    Chief Technology Officer
    $378,000
    @ $108.00 · 2026-02-13
    BLUMOFE ROBERT
    Chief Technology Officer
    $339,500
    @ $97.00 · 2026-01-22
    JOSEPH PAUL C
    Officer
    $450,874
    @ $90.17 · 2026-01-15
    KARON ADAM M
    Officer
    $289,836
    @ $87.30 · 2026-01-02
    MCGOWAN EDWARD J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $577,477
    @ $88.03 · 2025-12-15
    JOSEPH PAUL C
    Officer
    $438,451
    @ $87.69 · 2025-11-17
    BLUMOFE ROBERT
    Chief Technology Officer
    $263,051
    @ $87.68 · 2025-11-14
    BLUMOFE ROBERT
    Chief Technology Officer
    $301,000
    @ $86.00 · 2025-11-07
    JOSEPH PAUL C
    Officer
    $383,250
    @ $76.65 · 2025-09-15
    BLUMOFE ROBERT
    Chief Technology Officer
    $231,000
    @ $77.00 · 2025-08-22
    JOSEPH PAUL C
    Officer
    $388,700
    @ $77.74 · 2025-07-15
    BLUMOFE ROBERT
    Chief Technology Officer
    $253,714
    @ $77.97 · 2025-06-12
    SALEM-JACKSON KIM
    Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $76.33 · 2025-05-27
    KARON ADAM M
    Officer
    $333,863
    @ $85.02 · 2025-05-08
    JOSEPH PAUL C
    Officer
    $333,480
    @ $83.37 · 2025-03-18
    WILLIAMS ANTHONY P
    Officer
    $780,805
    @ $82.19 · 2025-03-17
    KARON ADAM M
    Officer
    $811,943
    @ $82.34 · 2025-03-11
    MCGOWAN EDWARD J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $971,911
    @ $82.34 · 2025-03-11
    KARON ADAM M
    Chief Operating Officer
    $485,140
    @ $86.20 · 2025-03-10
    MCGOWAN EDWARD J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $402,305
    @ $86.48 · 2025-03-10
    KARON ADAM M
    Chief Operating Officer
    $517,632
    @ $80.49 · 2025-03-04
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    BAC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $20.17M
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $4.41M
    @ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
    SCRIVENER THOMAS M
    Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
    BRONSTEIN SHERI B
    Officer
    $2.99M
    @ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
    ATHANASIA DEAN C
    President
    $6.86M
    @ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
    BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.42M
    @ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
    MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
    Officer
    $3.66M
    @ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
    HANS LINDSAY D
    Officer
    $402,410
    @ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(33/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    BAC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AKAM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
    BAC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    View AKAM Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: AKAM vs BAC

    Is Akamai Technologies, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to AKAM's -353.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $28 vs. $125).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Akamai Technologies, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?

    BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while AKAM scores 53/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

    BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AKAM scores 2.3 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Akamai Technologies, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?

    BAC earns 3.9% ROIC versus AKAM's 3.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.