Compare Stocks › AKAM vs AVGO

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) vs Broadcom Inc. (AVGO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, AKAM is overvalued at $93, with a DCF intrinsic value of $9 and a margin of safety of -913%. AVGO is overvalued at $326, with an intrinsic value of $259 and a margin of safety of -26%. Of the two, AVGO has the wider margin of safety.

AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
$92.72
VS
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$326.08

Rewards

AKAM
  • ★Market sentiment is in extreme fear territory (score: 25/100) — historically, periods of fear have often presented buying opportunities.
AVGO
  • ★Gross margin of 75.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 18.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $11.66 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

AKAM
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 5.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • ⚠21 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
AVGO
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 6.5 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 13% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AKAM
AVGO
Valuation
$710.06M
Free Cash Flow
$30.60B
5.33%
FCF Yield
1.97%
33.59
Trailing P/E
41.64
13.56
Forward P/E
16.75
Quality & Moat
1.85%
ROIC
24.03%
8.92%
ROE
44.25%
57.45%
Gross Margin
75.52%
1.08
PEG Ratio
0.32
Balance Sheet Safety
1.26
Net Debt / Equity
0.36
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
5.54
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.68
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.80%
AKAM: 3Ties: 1AVGO: 8
AKAMAVGO

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AKAM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

AVGO

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AKAM
$-0.38
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.50B
Δ Market Cap
$-566.5M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
AVGO
$97.03
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$14.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.41T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AKAM
913.0% Overvalued
Price is 913.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $92.72
Fair Value: $9.15
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
AVGO
33.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 33.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $326.08
Fair Value: $490.24
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AKAM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $93?

+18.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.9%

The market implies +18.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

AVGO

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $326?

+20.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.8%

The market implies +20.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +20.8%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AKAM
53/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
AVGO
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AKAM
-2.80
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
AVGO
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AKAM
Insiders 2.1%Institutions 112.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,132
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
AVGO
Insiders 1.9%Institutions 79.9%Retail & Other 18.2%
No. of Institutional Holders6,273
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AKAM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
LEIGHTON F THOMSON
Chief Executive Officer
$3.61M
@ $72.26 · 2025-08-11
HESSE DANIEL R
Director
$216,897
@ $72.30 · 2025-08-11
LEIGHTON F THOMSON
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $79.58 · 2025-02-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
AVGO
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $698,699
YOU HARRY L
Director
$373,570
@ $373.57 · 2026-06-11
YOU HARRY L
Director
$325,129
@ $325.13 · 2025-12-18
YOU HARRY L
Director
$1.23M
@ $345.88 · 2025-09-10
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AKAM
2
Sells (3M)
21
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.71M
SALEM-JACKSON KIM
Officer
$257,664
@ $128.00 · 2026-09-25
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$327,453
@ $105.63 · 2026-09-15
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$392,987
@ $126.77 · 2026-07-15
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$31,447
@ $129.41 · 2026-06-18
SALEM-JACKSON KIM
Officer
$311,811
@ $135.57 · 2026-06-10
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$531,256
@ $106.25 · 2026-03-16
KARON ADAM M
Officer
$1.83M
@ $107.43 · 2026-03-12
WILLIAMS ANTHONY P
Officer
$1.56M
@ $104.29 · 2026-03-11
MCGOWAN EDWARD J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.39M
@ $101.19 · 2026-03-10
RANGANATHAN MADHU
Director
$319,362
@ $102.00 · 2026-03-04
MILLER JONATHAN FRANK
Director
$1.13M
@ $102.67 · 2026-03-04
KARON ADAM M
Officer
$458,190
@ $96.91 · 2026-03-02
HOWELL LAURA
Officer
$1.13M
@ $100.14 · 2026-02-25
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$378,000
@ $108.00 · 2026-02-13
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$339,500
@ $97.00 · 2026-01-22
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$450,874
@ $90.17 · 2026-01-15
KARON ADAM M
Officer
$289,836
@ $87.30 · 2026-01-02
MCGOWAN EDWARD J
Chief Financial Officer
$577,477
@ $88.03 · 2025-12-15
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$438,451
@ $87.69 · 2025-11-17
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$263,051
@ $87.68 · 2025-11-14
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$301,000
@ $86.00 · 2025-11-07
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$383,250
@ $76.65 · 2025-09-15
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$231,000
@ $77.00 · 2025-08-22
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$388,700
@ $77.74 · 2025-07-15
BLUMOFE ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$253,714
@ $77.97 · 2025-06-12
SALEM-JACKSON KIM
Officer
$1.00M
@ $76.33 · 2025-05-27
KARON ADAM M
Officer
$333,863
@ $85.02 · 2025-05-08
JOSEPH PAUL C
Officer
$333,480
@ $83.37 · 2025-03-18
WILLIAMS ANTHONY P
Officer
$780,805
@ $82.19 · 2025-03-17
MCGOWAN EDWARD J
Chief Financial Officer
$971,911
@ $82.34 · 2025-03-11
KARON ADAM M
Officer
$811,943
@ $82.34 · 2025-03-11
MCGOWAN EDWARD J
Chief Financial Officer
$402,305
@ $86.48 · 2025-03-10
KARON ADAM M
Chief Operating Officer
$485,140
@ $86.20 · 2025-03-10
KARON ADAM M
Chief Operating Officer
$517,632
@ $80.49 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
AVGO
0
Sells (3M)
24
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $215.49M
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$10.03M
@ $401.33 · 2026-07-10
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.48M
@ $379.19 · 2026-07-08
DELLY GAYLA J
Director
$728,368
@ $385.38 · 2026-07-08
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$598,916
@ $373.86 · 2026-06-29
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.68M
@ $387.00 · 2026-06-25
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$3.18M
@ $389.59 · 2026-06-17
VELAGA S. RAM
Officer
$2.96M
@ $370.52 · 2026-04-10
VELAGA S. RAM
Officer
$10.64M
@ $352.08 · 2026-04-09
DELLY GAYLA J
Director
$358,310
@ $358.31 · 2026-04-09
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$712,354
@ $353.00 · 2026-04-08
VELAGA S. RAM
Officer
$20.82M
@ $323.38 · 2026-03-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$27.06M
@ $323.39 · 2026-03-17
KAWWAS CHARLIE B
Officer
$20.97M
@ $323.39 · 2026-03-17
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$19.45M
@ $323.38 · 2026-03-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$10.41M
@ $347.12 · 2026-01-06
TAN HOCK E
Chief Executive Officer
$24.31M
@ $347.30 · 2026-01-06
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.43M
@ $347.82 · 2025-12-31
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.13M
@ $352.07 · 2025-12-26
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$12.54M
@ $327.65 · 2025-12-17
KAWWAS CHARLIE B
Officer
$1.05M
@ $332.95 · 2025-12-17
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $332.91 · 2025-12-17
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$8.36M
@ $340.91 · 2025-12-16
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$289,512
@ $361.89 · 2025-12-15
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$264,912
@ $331.14 · 2025-11-14
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$280,120
@ $350.15 · 2025-10-14
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$9.59M
@ $352.61 · 2025-09-17
KAWWAS CHARLIE B
Officer
$2.26M
@ $352.74 · 2025-09-17
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$288,000
@ $360.00 · 2025-09-15
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$245,968
@ $307.46 · 2025-08-14
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$219,440
@ $274.30 · 2025-07-14
TAN HOCK E
Chief Executive Officer
$10.73M
@ $268.29 · 2025-06-26
DELLY GAYLA J
Director
$795,390
@ $265.13 · 2025-06-26
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$9.50M
@ $261.27 · 2025-06-24
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$13.11M
@ $262.10 · 2025-06-24
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$12.66M
@ $253.28 · 2025-06-23
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$14.18M
@ $251.75 · 2025-06-18
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$200,280
@ $250.35 · 2025-06-16
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$184,152
@ $230.19 · 2025-05-14
PAGE JUSTINE F.
Director
$148,000
@ $185.00 · 2025-04-14
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$5.84M
@ $194.65 · 2025-03-24
LOW CHECK KIAN
Director
$11.30M
@ $235.35 · 2025-01-06
BRAZEAL MARK DAVID
Officer
$4.82M
@ $238.79 · 2024-12-24
TAN HOCK E
Chief Executive Officer
$10.80M
@ $239.96 · 2024-12-24
BRYANT DIANE M
Director
$3.40M
@ $226.68 · 2024-12-23
SPEARS KIRSTEN MARGRETA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.89M
@ $229.62 · 2024-12-20
YOU HARRY L
Director
$1.57M
@ $240.00 · 2024-12-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AKAM
FearGreed
😨Fear(25/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
AVGO
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AKAM
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
AVGO
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
View AKAM Full AnalysisView AVGO Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AKAM vs AVGO

Is Akamai Technologies, Inc. or Broadcom Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AVGO trades at a -25.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $259 vs. price $326), compared to AKAM's -913.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $9 vs. $93).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Akamai Technologies, Inc. or Broadcom Inc.?▼

AVGO scores 61/100 (Narrow moat), while AKAM scores 53/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Akamai Technologies, Inc. in financial distress?▼

AKAM's Altman Z-Score of 2.3 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AVGO scores 12.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Akamai Technologies, Inc. or Broadcom Inc.?▼

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) generates a 5.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Broadcom Inc.'s 2.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Akamai Technologies, Inc. or Broadcom Inc.?▼

AVGO earns 24.0% ROIC versus AKAM's 1.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

AKAM vs AVGO: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io