Compare StocksAIZ vs INTC

Assurant, Inc. (AIZ) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

AIZ
Assurant, Inc.
$231.51
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61

Rewards

AIZ
  • Assurant, Inc. scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 57.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.68 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTC

    Risks

    AIZ
    • Gross margin of 11.9% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.78 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AIZ
    INTC
    Valuation
    $2.19B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    18.98%
    FCF Yield
    -1.66%
    13.68
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    10.47
    Forward P/E
    66.78
    Quality & Moat
    12.57%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    14.86%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    11.89%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    0.91
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.39
    Debt / Equity
    0.36
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.05
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    1.45%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    AIZ: 7Ties: 1INTC: 2
    AIZINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AIZ

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AIZ
    $2.99
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.80B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$5.39B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AIZ
    38.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 38.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $231.51
    Fair Value: $373.38
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AIZ

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $232?

    +2.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -11.2%

    The market implies +2.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -11.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AIZ
    95/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AIZ
    -2.71
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AIZ
    Insiders 0.8%Institutions 90.3%Retail & Other 8.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders824
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AIZ
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AIZ
    2
    Sells (3M)
    7
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $5.74M
    DIRIENZO DIMITRY
    Officer
    $158,235
    @ $210.98 · 2026-03-20
    SENGUPTA SUBHASHISH
    Officer
    $400,096
    @ $210.58 · 2026-03-20
    DEMMINGS KEITH
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.03M
    @ $220.52 · 2025-10-03
    DEMMINGS KEITH
    Chief Executive Officer
    $941,671
    @ $220.27 · 2025-08-29
    ROSENBLUM JAY E.
    Officer
    $813,256
    @ $208.53 · 2025-08-12
    DIRIENZO DIMITRY
    Officer
    $194,707
    @ $204.95 · 2025-08-08
    ROSENBLUM JAY E.
    Officer
    $201,926
    @ $201.93 · 2025-05-16
    LONERGAN ROBERT ANTHONY
    Officer
    $743,354
    @ $212.39 · 2025-03-20
    DIRIENZO DIMITRY
    Officer
    $351,507
    @ $213.03 · 2025-03-20
    NAIR BIJU
    Officer
    $604,486
    @ $201.50 · 2025-02-19
    NAIR BIJU
    Officer
    $627,532
    @ $209.18 · 2024-11-08
    DIRIENZO DIMITRY
    Officer
    $103,639
    @ $188.43 · 2024-08-19
    ROSENBLUM JAY E.
    Officer
    $311,929
    @ $178.25 · 2024-08-12
    JENNS MARTIN
    Officer
    $267,199
    @ $178.13 · 2024-08-12
    CAMPBELL MICHAEL P
    Officer
    $1.89M
    @ $171.61 · 2024-05-21
    DIRIENZO DIMITRY
    Officer
    $365,304
    @ $175.29 · 2024-05-17
    LONERGAN ROBERT ANTHONY
    Officer
    $475,529
    @ $176.12 · 2024-05-16
    LUTHI-PREVITALI FRANCESCA L.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.18M
    @ $176.36 · 2024-05-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AIZ
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(66/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AIZ
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    View AIZ Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    AIZ vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io