Compare StocksAIG vs INTC

American International Group, Inc. (AIG) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

AIG
American International Group, Inc.
$73.89
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

AIG
  • Share count has been reduced by 27% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • FCF yield of 28.2% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -0.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
INTC

    Risks

    AIG
    • American International Group, Inc. scores only 16/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.72 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 7.1% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AIG
    INTC
    Valuation
    $11.26B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    28.24%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    13.61
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    8.35
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    5.65%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    7.52%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    34.11%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.24
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.29
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    2.44%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    AIG: 7Ties: 1INTC: 1
    AIGINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AIG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AIG
    $-0.17
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $2.31B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-384.8M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AIG
    55.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 55.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $73.89
    Fair Value: $166.72
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AIG

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $74?

    +0.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -18.8%

    The market implies +0.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding -18.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AIG
    16/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AIG
    -2.49
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AIG
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 99.3%Retail & Other 0.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,548
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,154
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AIG
    2
    Buys (3M)
    6
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $106,460
    INGLIS JOHN C
    Director
    $1,200
    @ $92.31 · 2025-12-30
    WALSH KEITH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2,207
    @ $81.74 · 2025-12-30
    INGLIS JOHN C
    Director
    $1,193
    @ $79.53 · 2025-09-30
    INGLIS JOHN C
    Director
    $50,307
    @ $77.04 · 2025-08-08
    INGLIS JOHN C
    Director
    $895.00
    @ $89.50 · 2025-06-27
    INGLIS JOHN C
    Director
    $50,658
    @ $78.66 · 2025-03-31
    RICE JOHN G
    Director
    $770,000
    @ $77.00 · 2025-02-13
    INGLIS JOHN C
    Director
    $787.00
    @ $78.70 · 2024-12-30
    INGLIS JOHN C
    Director
    $50,002
    @ $75.76 · 2024-11-26
    INGLIS JOHN C
    Director
    $520.00
    @ $74.29 · 2024-09-30
    INGLIS JOHN C
    Director
    $518.00
    @ $86.33 · 2024-06-28
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AIG
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $11.96M
    CARBONE KATHLEEN
    Officer
    $2.53M
    @ $84.06 · 2025-05-20
    GLAZER ROSE MARIE E
    General Counsel
    $2.94M
    @ $84.02 · 2025-05-16
    WADE CLAUDE E.
    Officer
    $1.88M
    @ $83.57 · 2025-05-05
    TWININGDAVIS MELISSA
    Officer
    $776,072
    @ $83.26 · 2025-05-05
    FLATT CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $3.85M
    @ $83.26 · 2025-05-05
    ZAFFINO PETER
    Chief Executive Officer
    $14.90M
    @ $74.52 · 2024-06-12
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AIG
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(41/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AIG
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View AIG Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    American International Group, Inc. (AIG) vs Intel Corporation (INTC) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io