Compare StocksAIG vs BAC

American International Group, I (AIG) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, AIG is undervalued at $79, with a DCF intrinsic value of $79560606442 and a margin of safety of 100%. BAC is undervalued at $62, with an intrinsic value of $966181785898 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

AIG
American International Group, I
$78.58
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$61.95

Rewards

AIG
  • American International Group, I scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.64 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -0.1x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

AIG
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.49 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 7.1% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.14 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AIG
BAC
Valuation
$9.52B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
13.83
Trailing P/E
14.31
8.89
Forward P/E
11.74
Quality & Moat
7.92%
ROIC
4.37%
7.72%
ROE
11.20%
35.53%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.64
PEG Ratio
1.06
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.05
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
2.55%
Dividend Yield
2.07%
AIG: 5Ties: 2BAC: 1
AIGBAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AIG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AIG
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$2.31B
Δ Market Cap
+$22.31
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BAC
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.88
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AIG
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $78.58
Fair Value: $79560606442.17
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BAC
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $61.95
Fair Value: $966181785897.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AIG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $79?

-30.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -30.0% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies -30.0%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AIG
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AIG
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AIG
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 100.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,518
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BAC
Insiders 7.4%Institutions 71.4%Retail & Other 21.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,431
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AIG
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $54,907
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$1,200
@ $92.31 · 2025-12-30
WALSH KEITH
Chief Financial Officer
$2,207
@ $81.74 · 2025-12-30
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$1,193
@ $79.53 · 2025-09-30
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$50,307
@ $77.04 · 2025-08-08
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$895.00
@ $89.50 · 2025-06-27
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$50,658
@ $78.66 · 2025-03-31
RICE JOHN G
Director
$770,000
@ $77.00 · 2025-02-13
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$787.00
@ $78.70 · 2024-12-30
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$50,002
@ $75.76 · 2024-11-26
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$520.00
@ $74.29 · 2024-09-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AIG
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
CARBONE KATHLEEN
Officer
$2.53M
@ $84.06 · 2025-05-20
GLAZER ROSE MARIE E
General Counsel
$2.94M
@ $84.02 · 2025-05-16
WADE CLAUDE E.
Officer
$1.88M
@ $83.57 · 2025-05-05
TWININGDAVIS MELISSA
Officer
$776,072
@ $83.26 · 2025-05-05
FLATT CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$3.85M
@ $83.26 · 2025-05-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AIG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AIG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
View AIG Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AIG vs BAC

Is American International Group, I or Bank of America Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $966181785898 vs. price $62), compared to AIG's 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $79560606442 vs. $79).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, American International Group, I or Bank of America Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while AIG scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AIG scores 0.5 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, American International Group, I or Bank of America Corporation?

AIG earns 7.9% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, American International Group, I's or Bank of America Corporation's?

AIG's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). AIG has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

AIG vs BAC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io