Compare StocksAIG vs BAC

American International Group, Inc. (AIG) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, AIG is undervalued at $74, with a DCF intrinsic value of $151 and a margin of safety of 51%. BAC is undervalued at $56, with an intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

AIG
American International Group, Inc.
$74.02
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20

Rewards

AIG
  • American International Group, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Share count has been reduced by 27% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • 5 insider purchases over the past 12 months with a buy/sell ratio above 3:1 — a sustained pattern of insider confidence.
BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

AIG
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.72 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 7.1% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AIG
BAC
Valuation
$9.52B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
24.25%
FCF Yield
N/A
13.03
Trailing P/E
13.95
8.32
Forward P/E
11.13
Quality & Moat
7.92%
ROIC
3.89%
7.72%
ROE
10.64%
35.53%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.61
PEG Ratio
1.02
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.05
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
2.66%
Dividend Yield
1.97%
AIG: 6Ties: 1BAC: 1
AIGBAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AIG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AIG
$-0.17
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.31B
Δ Market Cap
$-384.8M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AIG
51.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 51.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $74.02
Fair Value: $151.17
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AIG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $74?

+1.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -15.4%

The market implies +1.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -15.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AIG
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AIG
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AIG
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 100.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,530
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AIG
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $55,802
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$1,200
@ $92.31 · 2025-12-30
WALSH KEITH
Chief Financial Officer
$2,207
@ $81.74 · 2025-12-30
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$1,193
@ $79.53 · 2025-09-30
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$50,307
@ $77.04 · 2025-08-08
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$895.00
@ $89.50 · 2025-06-27
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$50,658
@ $78.66 · 2025-03-31
RICE JOHN G
Director
$770,000
@ $77.00 · 2025-02-13
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$787.00
@ $78.70 · 2024-12-30
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$50,002
@ $75.76 · 2024-11-26
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$520.00
@ $74.29 · 2024-09-30
INGLIS JOHN C
Director
$518.00
@ $86.33 · 2024-06-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AIG
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
CARBONE KATHLEEN
Officer
$2.53M
@ $84.06 · 2025-05-20
GLAZER ROSE MARIE E
General Counsel
$2.94M
@ $84.02 · 2025-05-16
WADE CLAUDE E.
Officer
$1.88M
@ $83.57 · 2025-05-05
TWININGDAVIS MELISSA
Officer
$776,072
@ $83.26 · 2025-05-05
FLATT CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$3.85M
@ $83.26 · 2025-05-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AIG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AIG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
View AIG Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AIG vs BAC

Is American International Group, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to AIG's 51.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $151 vs. $74).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, American International Group, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while AIG scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AIG scores 0.7 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, American International Group, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?

AIG earns 7.9% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, American International Group, Inc.'s or Bank of America Corporation's?

AIG's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). AIG has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.