Compare StocksAFL vs UNH

AFLAC Incorporated (AFL) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, AFL is undervalued at $127, with a DCF intrinsic value of $98270762995 and a margin of safety of 100%. UNH is overvalued at $414, with an intrinsic value of $371 and a margin of safety of -12%. Of the two, AFL has the wider margin of safety.

AFL
AFLAC Incorporated
$127.48
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$414.40

Rewards

AFL
    UNH
    • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    AFL
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.81 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • 6 insider sales totaling $2.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 13.0% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    UNH
    • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 19.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • FCF yield of 6.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AFL
    UNH
    Valuation
    $4.92B
    Free Cash Flow
    $22.76B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    6.05%
    14.57
    Trailing P/E
    31.25
    16.89
    Forward P/E
    18.47
    Quality & Moat
    9.52%
    ROIC
    14.15%
    16.47%
    ROE
    14.15%
    50.05%
    Gross Margin
    19.51%
    1.18
    PEG Ratio
    1.28
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.21
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.40
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.05
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.73
    1.91%
    Dividend Yield
    2.24%
    AFL: 7Ties: 1UNH: 3
    AFLUNH

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AFL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    UNH

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AFL
    $0.00
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $10.50B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$38.33
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    UNH
    $-7.37
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $26.63B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-196.16B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AFL
    100.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $127.48
    Fair Value: $98270762994.56
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    UNH
    11.7% Overvalued
    Price is 11.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $414.40
    Fair Value: $370.88
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AFL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $127?

    -30.0%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

    UNH

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $414?

    +14.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +6.6%

    The market implies +14.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AFL
    65/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    UNH
    73/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AFL
    -2.40
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    UNH
    -2.45
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AFL
    Insiders 10.8%Institutions 59.5%Retail & Other 29.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,115
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    UNH
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 86.1%Retail & Other 13.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,164
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AFL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    UNH
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    REX JOHN F
    President
    $5.00M
    @ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
    HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $25.02M
    @ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
    GIL KRISTEN
    Director
    $1.00M
    @ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
    FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
    Director
    $491,786
    @ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
    NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
    Director
    $93,647
    @ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AFL
    6
    Sells (3M)
    21
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $13.43M
    MOSKOWITZ JOSEPH L
    Director
    $1.44M
    @ $116.54 · 2026-06-22
    BEAVER STEVEN KENT
    Officer
    $648,897
    @ $117.81 · 2026-05-22
    KENNY THOMAS J
    Director
    $202,832
    @ $116.57 · 2026-05-15
    COLLINS ARTHUR REGINALD
    Director
    $268,065
    @ $116.55 · 2026-05-14
    MOSKOWITZ JOSEPH L
    Director
    $68,238
    @ $113.73 · 2026-05-08
    HOSODA MIWAKO
    Director
    $27,824
    @ $114.50 · 2026-05-06
    LAKE CHARLES D II
    Officer
    $737,308
    @ $113.43 · 2026-05-05
    LAKE CHARLES D II
    Officer
    $536,365
    @ $107.27 · 2026-03-25
    KOIDE MASATOSHI
    Officer
    $1.70M
    @ $109.93 · 2026-03-11
    LAKE CHARLES D II
    Officer
    $1.71M
    @ $109.93 · 2026-03-11
    MOSKOWITZ JOSEPH L
    Director
    $66,054
    @ $110.09 · 2026-03-09
    BEAVER STEVEN KENT
    Officer
    $839,015
    @ $113.58 · 2026-02-20
    BRODEN MAX
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.53M
    @ $117.67 · 2026-02-06
    BEAVER STEVEN KENT
    Officer
    $601,520
    @ $109.53 · 2025-12-12
    BEAVER STEVEN KENT
    Officer
    $377,166
    @ $109.26 · 2025-12-05
    TILLMAN AUDREY BOONE
    Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $112.00 · 2025-11-18
    MOSKOWITZ JOSEPH L
    Director
    $89,404
    @ $113.75 · 2025-11-17
    TILLMAN AUDREY BOONE
    Officer
    $397,325
    @ $115.10 · 2025-11-14
    MOSKOWITZ JOSEPH L
    Director
    $114,000
    @ $114.00 · 2025-11-07
    SIMARD FREDERIC JEAN GUY
    Officer
    $193,725
    @ $112.50 · 2025-11-06
    MOSKOWITZ JOSEPH L
    Director
    $102,570
    @ $102.57 · 2025-08-08
    KOIDE MASATOSHI
    Officer
    $3.91M
    @ $105.59 · 2025-05-20
    COLLINS ARTHUR REGINALD
    Director
    $290,689
    @ $105.71 · 2025-05-15
    KENNY THOMAS J
    Director
    $762,238
    @ $106.34 · 2025-05-09
    MOSKOWITZ JOSEPH L
    Director
    $106,790
    @ $106.79 · 2025-05-08
    LAKE CHARLES D II
    Officer
    $5.69M
    @ $107.44 · 2025-03-10
    KOIDE MASATOSHI
    Officer
    $2.36M
    @ $107.63 · 2025-03-07
    MOSKOWITZ JOSEPH L
    Director
    $107,630
    @ $107.63 · 2025-03-07
    TILLMAN AUDREY BOONE
    Officer
    $2.56M
    @ $103.40 · 2024-12-27
    MOSKOWITZ JOSEPH L
    Director
    $64,998
    @ $108.33 · 2024-11-08
    MOSKOWITZ JOSEPH L
    Director
    $59,730
    @ $99.55 · 2024-08-08
    KENNY THOMAS J
    Director
    $197,890
    @ $98.94 · 2024-08-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    UNH
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $284,000
    CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
    Officer
    $284,000
    @ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
    CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
    Chief Executive Officer
    $179,645
    @ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AFL
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(69/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    UNH
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(57/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AFL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
    UNH
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
    View AFL Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: AFL vs UNH

    Is AFLAC Incorporated or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, AFL trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $98270762995 vs. price $127), compared to UNH's -11.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $371 vs. $414).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, AFLAC Incorporated or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

    UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while AFL scores 65/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is AFLAC Incorporated in financial distress?

    AFL's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. UNH scores 2.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, AFLAC Incorporated or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

    UNH earns 14.1% ROIC versus AFL's 9.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, AFLAC Incorporated's or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's?

    AFL's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to UNH's 84/100 (Very Safe). AFL has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.