Compare StocksAES vs JPM

The AES Corporation (AES) vs JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)

AES
The AES Corporation
$14.15
VS
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
$287.97

Rewards

AES
    JPM
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    AES
    • Gross margin of 18.4% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • High leverage (2.59x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 8.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    JPM
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • JPMorgan Chase & Co. scores only 18/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.30 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AES
    JPM
    Valuation
    $-3.09B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    -30.61%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    10.80
    Trailing P/E
    14.39
    5.93
    Forward P/E
    12.26
    Quality & Moat
    3.74%
    ROIC
    5.32%
    7.63%
    ROE
    N/A
    18.40%
    Gross Margin
    0.00%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    2.59
    Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    8.46
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    4.97%
    Dividend Yield
    2.08%
    AES: 4Ties: 1JPM: 1
    AESJPM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AES

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    JPM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AES
    $-6.40
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.41B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-9.02B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    JPM
    $3.95
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $120.20B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$475.31B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AES
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $14.15
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    JPM
    46.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 46.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $287.97
    Fair Value: $538.22
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AES

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    JPM

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AES
    38/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    JPM
    18/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AES
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    JPM
    -2.17
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AES
    Insiders 0.5%Institutions 88.1%Retail & Other 11.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders984
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    JPM
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 75.0%Retail & Other 24.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders6,240
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AES
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    JPM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AES
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    KOHAN SHERRY
    Officer
    $305,250
    @ $20.35 · 2024-06-06
    MENDOZA TISH
    Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $21.21 · 2024-05-20
    DA SANTOS BERNERD R
    Officer
    $1.40M
    @ $21.15 · 2024-05-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    JPM
    12
    Sells (3M)
    30
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $104.76M
    LEOPOLD ROBIN
    Officer
    $132,684
    @ $307.14 · 2026-02-19
    ROHRBAUGH TROY L
    Officer
    $15.36M
    @ $307.11 · 2026-02-19
    BARNUM JEREMY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $886,157
    @ $306.42 · 2026-02-17
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $627,207
    @ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $306.41 · 2026-02-17
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $1.07M
    @ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.68M
    @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
    BARNUM JEREMY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $904,890
    @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $640,295
    @ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $1.79M
    @ $312.78 · 2026-01-16
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $1.09M
    @ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
    BACON ASHLEY
    Officer
    $2.30M
    @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
    LEOPOLD ROBIN
    Officer
    $301,311
    @ $311.92 · 2025-11-07
    BAMMANN LINDA B.
    Director
    $2.83M
    @ $297.94 · 2025-09-02
    BACON ASHLEY
    Officer
    $1.39M
    @ $267.44 · 2025-06-12
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.61M
    @ $262.47 · 2025-06-05
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.57M
    @ $267.09 · 2025-05-16
    LAKE MARIANNE
    Officer
    $3.28M
    @ $267.08 · 2025-05-16
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $2.71M
    @ $266.89 · 2025-05-15
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $3.69M
    @ $262.54 · 2025-05-13
    BACON ASHLEY
    Officer
    $1.37M
    @ $262.53 · 2025-05-13
    ROHRBAUGH TROY L
    Officer
    $3.29M
    @ $263.08 · 2025-05-12
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.54M
    @ $250.76 · 2025-05-06
    BARNUM JEREMY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.03M
    @ $250.77 · 2025-05-06
    BAMMANN LINDA B.
    Director
    $2.38M
    @ $250.00 · 2025-05-06
    DIMON JAMES
    Chief Executive Officer
    $31.50M
    @ $235.68 · 2025-04-14
    LEOPOLD ROBIN
    Officer
    $308,652
    @ $246.92 · 2025-03-24
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.06M
    @ $247.03 · 2025-03-24
    ROHRBAUGH TROY L
    Officer
    $6.18M
    @ $247.02 · 2025-03-24
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $506,698
    @ $246.93 · 2025-03-24
    LEOPOLD ROBIN
    Officer
    $337,610
    @ $270.09 · 2025-02-20
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.15M
    @ $269.85 · 2025-02-20
    ROHRBAUGH TROY L
    Officer
    $10.12M
    @ $269.84 · 2025-02-20
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $554,054
    @ $269.88 · 2025-02-20
    FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
    General Counsel
    $919,371
    @ $278.34 · 2025-02-18
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $1.47M
    @ $278.37 · 2025-02-18
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $971,646
    @ $278.41 · 2025-02-18
    FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
    General Counsel
    $838,778
    @ $253.94 · 2025-01-16
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $1.34M
    @ $253.97 · 2025-01-16
    BACON ASHLEY
    Officer
    $1.81M
    @ $253.94 · 2025-01-16
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $886,565
    @ $253.96 · 2025-01-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AES
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(40/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    JPM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(51/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AES
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (40)
    JPM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
    View AES Full AnalysisView JPM Full Analysis
    The AES Corporation (AES) vs JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io