Compare StocksAEP vs BAC

American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, AEP is overvalued at $121, with a DCF intrinsic value of $42 and a margin of safety of -192%. BAC is undervalued at $58, with an intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

AEP
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
$121.20
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$58.15

Rewards

AEP
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.57 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.90 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

AEP
  • PEG ratio of 2.04 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • High leverage (1.59x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.9x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AEP
BAC
Valuation
$-6.00B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
-9.09%
FCF Yield
N/A
21.01
Trailing P/E
13.43
17.68
Forward P/E
10.99
Quality & Moat
4.82%
ROIC
4.37%
10.13%
ROE
11.20%
46.35%
Gross Margin
0.00%
2.04
PEG Ratio
0.90
Balance Sheet Safety
1.59
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
5.86
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
3.15%
Dividend Yield
2.21%
AEP: 3Ties: 1BAC: 4
AEPBAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AEP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AEP
$4.38
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.10B
Δ Market Cap
+$13.58B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AEP
191.6% Overvalued
Price is 191.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $121.20
Fair Value: $41.57
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BAC
59.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $58.15
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AEP

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AEP
43/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AEP
-2.54
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AEP
Insiders 0.0%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 5.7%
No. of Institutional Holders2,456
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AEP
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AEP
1
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.31M
DIXON KATE
Officer
$250,000
@ $125.00 · 2026-09-08
FERNEAU KELLY J.
Officer
$177,602
@ $131.46 · 2026-02-24
FOWKE BENJAMIN G S III
Director
$575,350
@ $115.07 · 2025-12-12
FOWKE BENJAMIN G S III
Director
$607,900
@ $121.58 · 2025-11-14
FOWKE BENJAMIN G S III
Director
$587,600
@ $117.52 · 2025-10-10
FERNEAU KELLY J.
Officer
$112,672
@ $112.00 · 2025-10-02
FOWKE BENJAMIN G S III
Director
$543,250
@ $108.65 · 2025-09-12
FERNEAU KELLY J.
Officer
$383,902
@ $111.99 · 2025-08-15
FOWKE BENJAMIN G S III
Director
$559,950
@ $111.99 · 2025-08-15
FEINBERG DAVID MATTHEW
Officer
$819,821
@ $101.74 · 2025-06-17
FEINBERG DAVID MATTHEW
Officer
$817,806
@ $101.49 · 2025-06-10
FEINBERG DAVID MATTHEW
Officer
$829,388
@ $102.94 · 2025-06-03
LIES QUINTON S
Officer
$1.04M
@ $102.68 · 2025-05-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AEP
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AEP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
View AEP Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AEP vs BAC

Is American Electric Power Company, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to AEP's -191.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $42 vs. $121).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, American Electric Power Company, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while AEP scores 43/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AEP scores 0.9 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, American Electric Power Company, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?

AEP earns 4.8% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, American Electric Power Company, Inc.'s or Bank of America Corporation's?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to AEP's 69/100 (Safe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.