Compare StocksAEE vs TSLA

Ameren Corporation (AEE) vs Tesla, Inc. (TSLA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, AEE is overvalued at $110, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. TSLA is overvalued at $311, with an intrinsic value of $143 and a margin of safety of -118%. Of the two, AEE has the wider margin of safety.

AEE
Ameren Corporation
$109.61
VS
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
$311.21

Rewards

AEE
    TSLA
    • Altman Z-Score of 19.94 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.6x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

    Risks

    AEE
    • PEG ratio of 2.45 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • High leverage (1.58x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    TSLA
    • ROIC has declined by 21.5 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 18.9% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Share count has increased by 19% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AEE
    TSLA
    Valuation
    $-1.77B
    Free Cash Flow
    $4.84B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    0.39%
    19.30
    Trailing P/E
    285.51
    18.87
    Forward P/E
    140.23
    Quality & Moat
    4.10%
    ROIC
    1.11%
    11.94%
    ROE
    4.67%
    52.35%
    Gross Margin
    18.85%
    2.45
    PEG Ratio
    4.56
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.58
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    5.53
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -2.55
    2.74%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    AEE: 7Ties: 1TSLA: 3
    AEETSLA

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AEE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    TSLA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AEE
    Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.
    TSLA
    $50.04
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $25.92B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.30T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AEE
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $109.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TSLA
    425.3% Overvalued
    Price is 425.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $311.21
    Fair Value: $59.25
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AEE

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    TSLA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $311?

    +47.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +43.3%

    The market implies +47.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +43.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AEE
    39/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    TSLA
    31/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AEE

    Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

    TSLA
    -2.86
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AEE
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 86.4%Retail & Other 13.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,242
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TSLA
    Insiders 17.8%Institutions 42.7%Retail & Other 39.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,241
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AEE
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TSLA
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $999.96M
    MUSK ELON REEVE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $999.96M
    @ $389.28 · 2025-09-12
    GEBBIA JOSEPH
    Director
    $1.03M
    @ $256.31 · 2025-04-24
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AEE
    1
    Sells (3M)
    18
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.91M
    SHAW THERESA A
    Officer
    $199,476
    @ $109.30 · 2026-05-14
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Officer
    $738,595
    @ $113.63 · 2026-05-01
    LINDGREN MARK C
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $231,844
    @ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
    SCHUKAR SHAWN E
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $556,404
    @ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
    LYONS MARTIN J JR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
    FLORES RAFAEL
    Director
    $178,432
    @ $111.52 · 2026-02-17
    MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $393,473
    @ $110.90 · 2026-02-17
    SHAW THERESA A
    Officer
    $36,364
    @ $111.89 · 2026-02-17
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Officer
    $673,400
    @ $103.60 · 2026-02-02
    FLORES RAFAEL
    Director
    $23,672
    @ $105.21 · 2025-11-17
    FLORES RAFAEL
    Director
    $65,930
    @ $105.32 · 2025-11-17
    HARSHMAN RICHARD J
    Director
    $262,250
    @ $104.90 · 2025-11-14
    SHAW THERESA A
    Officer
    $34,050
    @ $104.77 · 2025-11-14
    SMITH PATRICK E.
    Officer
    $251,939
    @ $104.80 · 2025-11-14
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $659,360
    @ $101.44 · 2025-11-03
    LINDGREN MARK C
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $353,115
    @ $100.89 · 2025-09-12
    MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $149,250
    @ $99.50 · 2025-09-03
    MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $101,790
    @ $101.79 · 2025-08-22
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $666,510
    @ $102.54 · 2025-08-01
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $641,030
    @ $98.62 · 2025-05-20
    LINDGREN MARK C
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $194,087
    @ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
    NWAMU CHONDA J.
    Officer
    $557,535
    @ $101.37 · 2025-03-04
    SCHUKAR SHAWN E
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $492,276
    @ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
    LYONS MARTIN J JR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.54M
    @ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
    SHAW THERESA A
    Officer
    $99,530
    @ $99.53 · 2025-02-26
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $634,010
    @ $97.54 · 2025-02-20
    FLORES RAFAEL
    Director
    $186,067
    @ $97.93 · 2025-02-19
    IVEY CRAIG S
    Director
    $266,901
    @ $98.27 · 2025-02-19
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $598,975
    @ $92.15 · 2024-11-20
    NWAMU CHONDA J.
    General Counsel
    $131,923
    @ $81.94 · 2024-08-28
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $536,445
    @ $82.53 · 2024-08-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TSLA
    2
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $60.94M
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $402.27 · 2026-06-08
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $450.00 · 2026-05-13
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $9.99M
    @ $378.11 · 2026-04-30
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $9.27M
    @ $359.33 · 2026-03-30
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $899,077
    @ $397.12 · 2026-03-06
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $10.69M
    @ $415.56 · 2026-02-25
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $25.61M
    @ $450.66 · 2025-12-09
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.17M
    @ $443.93 · 2025-12-08
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $918,137
    @ $352.45 · 2025-09-08
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.77M
    @ $295.26 · 2025-07-08
    ZHU XIAOTONG
    Officer
    $4.86M
    @ $323.81 · 2025-06-12
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $732,573
    @ $285.71 · 2025-06-09
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.40M
    @ $342.30 · 2025-06-03
    EHRENPREIS IRA MATTHEW
    Director
    $170.64M
    @ $357.30 · 2025-05-27
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $32.73M
    @ $357.39 · 2025-05-27
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $350.11 · 2025-05-16
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.20M
    @ $300.00 · 2025-05-09
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $30.81M
    @ $274.12 · 2025-05-06
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.14M
    @ $284.40 · 2025-05-01
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $32.10M
    @ $285.58 · 2025-04-29
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $250.00 · 2025-04-07
    MURDOCH JAMES RUPERT
    Director
    $13.19M
    @ $240.79 · 2025-03-10
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $718,111
    @ $268.75 · 2025-03-06
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $33.67M
    @ $299.61 · 2025-03-03
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $296.02 · 2025-03-03
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $27.59M
    @ $367.87 · 2025-02-06
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $43.16M
    @ $384.04 · 2025-02-03
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.68M
    @ $383.11 · 2025-02-03
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.89M
    @ $413.56 · 2025-01-06
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $41.16M
    @ $411.63 · 2025-01-06
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $975,015
    @ $374.29 · 2024-12-06
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $35.25M
    @ $352.54 · 2024-12-04
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $39.79M
    @ $354.06 · 2024-12-02
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.48M
    @ $354.43 · 2024-12-02
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $35.34M
    @ $314.44 · 2024-11-15
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.80M
    @ $316.91 · 2024-11-11
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $34.60M
    @ $346.02 · 2024-11-11
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $251.76 · 2024-11-01
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $15.14M
    @ $250.23 · 2024-11-01
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $250.00 · 2024-10-24
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.00M
    @ $250.00 · 2024-09-23
    ZHU XIAOTONG
    Officer
    $65,867
    @ $221.77 · 2024-09-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AEE
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(52/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TSLA
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(26/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AEE
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
    TSLA
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
    View AEE Full AnalysisView TSLA Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: AEE vs TSLA

    Is Ameren Corporation or Tesla, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, AEE trades at a -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $0 vs. price $110), compared to TSLA's -117.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $143 vs. $311).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Ameren Corporation or Tesla, Inc.?

    AEE scores 39/100 (None moat), while TSLA scores 31/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Ameren Corporation in financial distress?

    AEE's Altman Z-Score of 0.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TSLA scores 19.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Ameren Corporation or Tesla, Inc.?

    AEE earns 4.1% ROIC versus TSLA's 1.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    AEE vs TSLA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io