Compare Stocks › AEE vs INTU
Ameren Corporation (AEE) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU)
AEE
Ameren Corporation
$113.56
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$399.02
Rewards
AEE
INTU
- ★Gross margin of 80.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
- ★Intuit Inc. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
- ★Free cash flow has grown at a 18.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
Risks
AEE
- ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 5.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
- ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.91 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
- ⚠6 insider sales totaling $4.4M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
INTU
- ⚠22 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →AEE
INTU
Valuation
$-1.48B
Free Cash Flow
$5.30B
-4.72%
FCF Yield
4.77%
21.23
Trailing P/E
25.98
19.58
Forward P/E
15.07
Quality & Moat
4.92%
ROIC
11.26%
10.76%
ROE
20.30%
49.24%
Gross Margin
80.90%
1.09
PEG Ratio
0.54
Balance Sheet Safety
1.47
Debt / Equity
0.36
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
5.35
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.64
2.64%
Dividend Yield
1.16%
AEE: 2Ties: 1INTU: 9
AEEINTU
Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →AEE
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
INTU
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →AEE
Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.
INTU
$12.31
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.10B
Δ Market Cap
+$75.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →AEE
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $113.56
Strongly undervalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTU
4.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 4.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $399.02
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $416.72
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →AEE
Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.
INTU
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $399?
+13.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.8%
The market implies +13.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.
Standard FCF implies a more demanding +8.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →AEE
37/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
INTU
79/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →AEE
-2.56
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
INTU
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →AEE
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 78.8%Retail & Other 20.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,189
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTU
Insiders 2.4%Institutions 90.9%Retail & Other 6.7%
No. of Institutional Holders2,894
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →AEE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTU
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →AEE
6
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.28M
LINDGREN MARK C
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$231,844
@ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
SCHUKAR SHAWN E
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$556,404
@ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
LYONS MARTIN J JR
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
FLORES RAFAEL
Director
$178,432
@ $111.52 · 2026-02-17
MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$393,473
@ $110.90 · 2026-02-17
SHAW THERESA A
Officer
$36,364
@ $111.89 · 2026-02-17
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Officer
$673,400
@ $103.60 · 2026-02-02
FLORES RAFAEL
Director
$23,672
@ $105.21 · 2025-11-17
FLORES RAFAEL
Director
$65,930
@ $105.32 · 2025-11-17
SHAW THERESA A
Officer
$34,050
@ $104.77 · 2025-11-14
SMITH PATRICK E.
Officer
$251,939
@ $104.80 · 2025-11-14
HARSHMAN RICHARD J
Director
$262,250
@ $104.90 · 2025-11-14
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$659,360
@ $101.44 · 2025-11-03
LINDGREN MARK C
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$353,115
@ $100.89 · 2025-09-12
MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$149,250
@ $99.50 · 2025-09-03
MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$101,790
@ $101.79 · 2025-08-22
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$666,510
@ $102.54 · 2025-08-01
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$641,030
@ $98.62 · 2025-05-20
LINDGREN MARK C
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$194,087
@ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
NWAMU CHONDA J.
Officer
$557,535
@ $101.37 · 2025-03-04
SCHUKAR SHAWN E
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$492,276
@ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
LYONS MARTIN J JR
Chief Executive Officer
$1.54M
@ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
SHAW THERESA A
Officer
$99,530
@ $99.53 · 2025-02-26
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$634,010
@ $97.54 · 2025-02-20
FLORES RAFAEL
Director
$186,067
@ $97.93 · 2025-02-19
IVEY CRAIG S
Director
$266,901
@ $98.27 · 2025-02-19
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$598,975
@ $92.15 · 2024-11-20
NWAMU CHONDA J.
General Counsel
$131,923
@ $81.94 · 2024-08-28
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$536,445
@ $82.53 · 2024-08-20
FLORES RAFAEL
Director
$106,935
@ $71.29 · 2024-06-07
DIYA FADI M
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$745,000
@ $74.50 · 2024-05-17
LINDGREN MARK C
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$302,120
@ $75.53 · 2024-05-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTU
1
Sells (3M)
22
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $112.35M
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$457,046
@ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$840,097
@ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$741,172
@ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$219,763
@ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$435,354
@ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$792,160
@ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$665,951
@ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$27,930
@ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$255,887
@ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$521,891
@ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$689,400
@ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$887,583
@ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$1.36M
@ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$1.12M
@ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$26.12M
@ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$19.29M
@ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$30.46M
@ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$11.66M
@ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$340,143
@ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$12.18M
@ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.00M
@ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$4.43M
@ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
BURTON EVE B
Director
$1.02M
@ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$667,838
@ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$814,350
@ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$2.94M
@ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$68,506
@ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$228,121
@ $630.17 · 2025-01-03
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$15.86M
@ $665.98 · 2024-12-12
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.06M
@ $657.64 · 2024-12-10
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$11.16M
@ $650.78 · 2024-12-09
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$6.21M
@ $646.47 · 2024-12-05
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$2.36M
@ $646.83 · 2024-12-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →AEE
😏Greed(66/100)
"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTU
😨Fear(38/100)
"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →AEE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
INTU
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)