Compare StocksAEE vs INTC

Ameren Corporation (AEE) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, AEE is overvalued at $110, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. INTC is overvalued at $90, with an intrinsic value of $7 and a margin of safety of -1271%. Of the two, AEE has the wider margin of safety.

AEE
Ameren Corporation
$109.61
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$90.20

Risks

AEE
  • PEG ratio of 2.45 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • High leverage (1.58x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
INTC
  • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • FCF yield of 1.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AEE
INTC
Valuation
$-1.77B
Free Cash Flow
$4.87B
N/A
FCF Yield
1.07%
19.30
Trailing P/E
N/A
18.87
Forward P/E
44.27
Quality & Moat
4.10%
ROIC
3.57%
11.94%
ROE
-10.71%
52.35%
Gross Margin
38.87%
2.45
PEG Ratio
1.36
Balance Sheet Safety
1.58
Net Debt / Equity
0.20
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
5.53
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.24
2.74%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
AEE: 5Ties: 1INTC: 4
AEEINTC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AEE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AEE
Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AEE
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $109.61
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $90.20
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AEE

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

INTC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $90?

+29.6%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AEE
39/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AEE

Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AEE
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 86.4%Retail & Other 13.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,242
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTC
Insiders 14.7%Institutions 63.9%Retail & Other 21.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,881
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AEE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTC
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $249,985
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,946
@ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AEE
1
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.91M
SHAW THERESA A
Officer
$199,476
@ $109.30 · 2026-05-14
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Officer
$738,595
@ $113.63 · 2026-05-01
LINDGREN MARK C
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$231,844
@ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
SCHUKAR SHAWN E
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$556,404
@ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
LYONS MARTIN J JR
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
FLORES RAFAEL
Director
$178,432
@ $111.52 · 2026-02-17
MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$393,473
@ $110.90 · 2026-02-17
SHAW THERESA A
Officer
$36,364
@ $111.89 · 2026-02-17
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Officer
$673,400
@ $103.60 · 2026-02-02
FLORES RAFAEL
Director
$23,672
@ $105.21 · 2025-11-17
FLORES RAFAEL
Director
$65,930
@ $105.32 · 2025-11-17
HARSHMAN RICHARD J
Director
$262,250
@ $104.90 · 2025-11-14
SHAW THERESA A
Officer
$34,050
@ $104.77 · 2025-11-14
SMITH PATRICK E.
Officer
$251,939
@ $104.80 · 2025-11-14
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$659,360
@ $101.44 · 2025-11-03
LINDGREN MARK C
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$353,115
@ $100.89 · 2025-09-12
MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$149,250
@ $99.50 · 2025-09-03
MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$101,790
@ $101.79 · 2025-08-22
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$666,510
@ $102.54 · 2025-08-01
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$641,030
@ $98.62 · 2025-05-20
LINDGREN MARK C
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$194,087
@ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
NWAMU CHONDA J.
Officer
$557,535
@ $101.37 · 2025-03-04
SCHUKAR SHAWN E
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$492,276
@ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
LYONS MARTIN J JR
Chief Executive Officer
$1.54M
@ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
SHAW THERESA A
Officer
$99,530
@ $99.53 · 2025-02-26
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$634,010
@ $97.54 · 2025-02-20
FLORES RAFAEL
Director
$186,067
@ $97.93 · 2025-02-19
IVEY CRAIG S
Director
$266,901
@ $98.27 · 2025-02-19
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$598,975
@ $92.15 · 2024-11-20
NWAMU CHONDA J.
General Counsel
$131,923
@ $81.94 · 2024-08-28
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$536,445
@ $82.53 · 2024-08-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTC
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AEE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTC
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AEE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
INTC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
View AEE Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AEE vs INTC

Is Ameren Corporation or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AEE trades at a -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $0 vs. price $110), compared to INTC's -1270.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $7 vs. $90).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Ameren Corporation or Intel Corporation?

AEE scores 39/100 (None moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Ameren Corporation in financial distress?

AEE's Altman Z-Score of 0.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Ameren Corporation or Intel Corporation?

AEE earns 4.1% ROIC versus INTC's 3.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

AEE vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io