Compare StocksAEE vs INTC

Ameren Corporation (AEE) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, AEE is overvalued at $109, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. INTC is overvalued at $134, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1513%. Of the two, AEE has the wider margin of safety.

AEE
Ameren Corporation
$108.67
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$133.99

Risks

AEE
  • PEG ratio of 2.58 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • High leverage (1.56x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.6x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
INTC
  • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • Insiders have sold $6.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
AEE
INTC
Valuation
$-1.87B
Free Cash Flow
$-8.30B
-6.22%
FCF Yield
-1.23%
19.54
Trailing P/E
N/A
18.71
Forward P/E
86.70
Quality & Moat
5.36%
ROIC
1.72%
11.75%
ROE
-2.91%
50.45%
Gross Margin
37.20%
2.58
PEG Ratio
1.36
Balance Sheet Safety
1.56
Net Debt / Equity
0.10
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
5.56
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.86
2.64%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
AEE: 6Ties: 1INTC: 4
AEEINTC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
AEE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
AEE
Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
AEE
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $108.67
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $133.99
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
AEE

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

INTC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
AEE
39/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
AEE

Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
AEE
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 86.3%Retail & Other 13.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,236
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTC
Insiders 14.7%Institutions 64.0%Retail & Other 21.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,349
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
AEE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTC
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $249,985
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,946
@ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
AEE
2
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.58M
SHAW THERESA A
Officer
$199,476
@ $109.30 · 2026-05-14
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Officer
$738,595
@ $113.63 · 2026-05-01
LINDGREN MARK C
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$231,844
@ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
SCHUKAR SHAWN E
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$556,404
@ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
LYONS MARTIN J JR
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
FLORES RAFAEL
Director
$178,432
@ $111.52 · 2026-02-17
MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$393,473
@ $110.90 · 2026-02-17
SHAW THERESA A
Officer
$36,364
@ $111.89 · 2026-02-17
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Officer
$673,400
@ $103.60 · 2026-02-02
FLORES RAFAEL
Director
$23,672
@ $105.21 · 2025-11-17
FLORES RAFAEL
Director
$65,930
@ $105.32 · 2025-11-17
SHAW THERESA A
Officer
$34,050
@ $104.77 · 2025-11-14
SMITH PATRICK E.
Officer
$251,939
@ $104.80 · 2025-11-14
HARSHMAN RICHARD J
Director
$262,250
@ $104.90 · 2025-11-14
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$659,360
@ $101.44 · 2025-11-03
LINDGREN MARK C
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$353,115
@ $100.89 · 2025-09-12
MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$149,250
@ $99.50 · 2025-09-03
MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$101,790
@ $101.79 · 2025-08-22
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$666,510
@ $102.54 · 2025-08-01
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$641,030
@ $98.62 · 2025-05-20
LINDGREN MARK C
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$194,087
@ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
NWAMU CHONDA J.
Officer
$557,535
@ $101.37 · 2025-03-04
SCHUKAR SHAWN E
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$492,276
@ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
LYONS MARTIN J JR
Chief Executive Officer
$1.54M
@ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
SHAW THERESA A
Officer
$99,530
@ $99.53 · 2025-02-26
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$634,010
@ $97.54 · 2025-02-20
FLORES RAFAEL
Director
$186,067
@ $97.93 · 2025-02-19
IVEY CRAIG S
Director
$266,901
@ $98.27 · 2025-02-19
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$598,975
@ $92.15 · 2024-11-20
NWAMU CHONDA J.
General Counsel
$131,923
@ $81.94 · 2024-08-28
MOEHN MICHAEL L
Chief Financial Officer
$536,445
@ $82.53 · 2024-08-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTC
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
AEE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTC
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
AEE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
INTC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
View AEE Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: AEE vs INTC

Is Ameren Corporation or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, AEE trades at a -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $0 vs. price $109), compared to INTC's -1512.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $134).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Ameren Corporation or Intel Corporation?

AEE scores 39/100 (None moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Ameren Corporation in financial distress?

AEE's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Ameren Corporation or Intel Corporation?

Intel Corporation (INTC) generates a -1.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Ameren Corporation's -6.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Ameren Corporation or Intel Corporation?

AEE earns 5.4% ROIC versus INTC's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.