Compare Stocks › AEE vs INTC

Ameren Corporation (AEE) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, AEE is overvalued at $111, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. INTC is overvalued at $66, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -697%. Of the two, AEE has the wider margin of safety.

AEE
Ameren Corporation
$110.54
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$65.76

Rewards

AEE
    INTC
    • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -0.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

    Risks

    AEE
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.73 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠High leverage (1.58x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 5.6x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    INTC
    • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • ⚠Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • ⚠FCF yield of 0.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AEE
    INTC
    Valuation
    $-1.79B
    Free Cash Flow
    $670.37M
    -5.84%
    FCF Yield
    0.19%
    19.46
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    19.05
    Forward P/E
    35.50
    Quality & Moat
    4.71%
    ROIC
    4.06%
    11.94%
    ROE
    -9.62%
    52.41%
    Gross Margin
    40.15%
    2.73
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.58
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    5.57
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.20
    2.71%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    AEE: 5Ties: 1INTC: 5
    AEEINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AEE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AEE
    Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AEE
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $110.54
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $65.76
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AEE

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    INTC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $66?

    +54.7%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AEE
    39/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AEE

    Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AEE
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 90.5%Retail & Other 9.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,260
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 13.9%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 23.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,439
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AEE
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $10.25M
    TAN LIP-BU
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.00M
    @ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AEE
    3
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $8.18M
    FLORES RAFAEL
    Director
    $26,171
    @ $105.53 · 2026-09-11
    MARTIN RYAN
    Officer
    $106,689
    @ $109.88 · 2026-08-20
    SHAW THERESA A
    Officer
    $35,402
    @ $108.93 · 2026-08-14
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Officer
    $708,240
    @ $108.96 · 2026-08-03
    SHAW THERESA A
    Officer
    $199,476
    @ $109.30 · 2026-05-14
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Officer
    $738,595
    @ $113.63 · 2026-05-01
    SCHUKAR SHAWN E
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $556,404
    @ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
    LINDGREN MARK C
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $231,844
    @ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
    LYONS MARTIN J JR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
    FLORES RAFAEL
    Director
    $178,432
    @ $111.52 · 2026-02-17
    MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $393,473
    @ $110.90 · 2026-02-17
    SHAW THERESA A
    Officer
    $36,364
    @ $111.89 · 2026-02-17
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Officer
    $673,400
    @ $103.60 · 2026-02-02
    FLORES RAFAEL
    Director
    $23,672
    @ $105.21 · 2025-11-17
    FLORES RAFAEL
    Director
    $65,930
    @ $105.32 · 2025-11-17
    SHAW THERESA A
    Officer
    $34,050
    @ $104.77 · 2025-11-14
    SMITH PATRICK E.
    Officer
    $251,939
    @ $104.80 · 2025-11-14
    HARSHMAN RICHARD J
    Director
    $262,250
    @ $104.90 · 2025-11-14
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $659,360
    @ $101.44 · 2025-11-03
    LINDGREN MARK C
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $353,115
    @ $100.89 · 2025-09-12
    MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $149,250
    @ $99.50 · 2025-09-03
    MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $101,790
    @ $101.79 · 2025-08-22
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $666,510
    @ $102.54 · 2025-08-01
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $641,030
    @ $98.62 · 2025-05-20
    SCHUKAR SHAWN E
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $492,276
    @ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
    LINDGREN MARK C
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $194,087
    @ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
    NWAMU CHONDA J.
    Officer
    $557,535
    @ $101.37 · 2025-03-04
    LYONS MARTIN J JR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.54M
    @ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
    SHAW THERESA A
    Officer
    $99,530
    @ $99.53 · 2025-02-26
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $634,010
    @ $97.54 · 2025-02-20
    IVEY CRAIG S
    Director
    $266,901
    @ $98.27 · 2025-02-19
    FLORES RAFAEL
    Director
    $186,067
    @ $97.93 · 2025-02-19
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $598,975
    @ $92.15 · 2024-11-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AEE
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(63/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(26/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AEE
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
    INTC
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
    View AEE Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: AEE vs INTC

    Is Ameren Corporation or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, AEE trades at a -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $0 vs. price $111), compared to INTC's -696.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $66).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Ameren Corporation or Intel Corporation?▼

    AEE scores 39/100 (None moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Ameren Corporation in financial distress?▼

    AEE's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Ameren Corporation or Intel Corporation?▼

    Intel Corporation (INTC) generates a 0.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Ameren Corporation's -5.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Ameren Corporation or Intel Corporation?▼

    AEE earns 4.7% ROIC versus INTC's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    AEE vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io