Compare Stocks › AEE vs GS

Ameren Corporation (AEE) vs The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, AEE is overvalued at $111, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. GS is undervalued at $895, with an intrinsic value of $1584 and a margin of safety of 44%. Of the two, GS has the wider margin of safety.

AEE
Ameren Corporation
$110.54
VS
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$894.55

Rewards

AEE
    GS
    • ★Gross margin of 81.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • ★Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
    • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.58 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    AEE
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.73 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠High leverage (1.58x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 5.6x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    GS
    • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • ⚠5 insider sales totaling $12.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    AEE
    GS
    Valuation
    $-1.79B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    -5.84%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    19.46
    Trailing P/E
    12.86
    19.05
    Forward P/E
    12.07
    Quality & Moat
    4.71%
    ROIC
    2.23%
    11.94%
    ROE
    17.75%
    52.41%
    Gross Margin
    81.29%
    2.73
    PEG Ratio
    1.12
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.58
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    5.57
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    2.71%
    Dividend Yield
    2.24%
    AEE: 2Ties: 1GS: 6
    AEEGS

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    AEE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    GS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    AEE
    Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.
    GS
    $5.60
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $26.00B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$145.60B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    AEE
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $110.54
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    GS
    43.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 43.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $894.55
    Fair Value: $1584.20
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    AEE

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    GS

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    AEE
    39/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    GS
    65/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    AEE

    Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

    GS
    -2.00
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    AEE
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 90.5%Retail & Other 9.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,260
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    GS
    Insiders 0.6%Institutions 75.7%Retail & Other 23.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,978
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    AEE
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    GS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    HESS JOHN B JR.
    Director
    $2.00M
    @ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
    JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
    Director
    $1.49M
    @ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    AEE
    3
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $8.18M
    FLORES RAFAEL
    Director
    $26,171
    @ $105.53 · 2026-09-11
    MARTIN RYAN
    Officer
    $106,689
    @ $109.88 · 2026-08-20
    SHAW THERESA A
    Officer
    $35,402
    @ $108.93 · 2026-08-14
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Officer
    $708,240
    @ $108.96 · 2026-08-03
    SHAW THERESA A
    Officer
    $199,476
    @ $109.30 · 2026-05-14
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Officer
    $738,595
    @ $113.63 · 2026-05-01
    SCHUKAR SHAWN E
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $556,404
    @ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
    LINDGREN MARK C
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $231,844
    @ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
    LYONS MARTIN J JR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
    FLORES RAFAEL
    Director
    $178,432
    @ $111.52 · 2026-02-17
    MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $393,473
    @ $110.90 · 2026-02-17
    SHAW THERESA A
    Officer
    $36,364
    @ $111.89 · 2026-02-17
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Officer
    $673,400
    @ $103.60 · 2026-02-02
    FLORES RAFAEL
    Director
    $23,672
    @ $105.21 · 2025-11-17
    FLORES RAFAEL
    Director
    $65,930
    @ $105.32 · 2025-11-17
    SHAW THERESA A
    Officer
    $34,050
    @ $104.77 · 2025-11-14
    SMITH PATRICK E.
    Officer
    $251,939
    @ $104.80 · 2025-11-14
    HARSHMAN RICHARD J
    Director
    $262,250
    @ $104.90 · 2025-11-14
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $659,360
    @ $101.44 · 2025-11-03
    LINDGREN MARK C
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $353,115
    @ $100.89 · 2025-09-12
    MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $149,250
    @ $99.50 · 2025-09-03
    MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $101,790
    @ $101.79 · 2025-08-22
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $666,510
    @ $102.54 · 2025-08-01
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $641,030
    @ $98.62 · 2025-05-20
    SCHUKAR SHAWN E
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $492,276
    @ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
    LINDGREN MARK C
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $194,087
    @ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
    NWAMU CHONDA J.
    Officer
    $557,535
    @ $101.37 · 2025-03-04
    LYONS MARTIN J JR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.54M
    @ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
    SHAW THERESA A
    Officer
    $99,530
    @ $99.53 · 2025-02-26
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $634,010
    @ $97.54 · 2025-02-20
    IVEY CRAIG S
    Director
    $266,901
    @ $98.27 · 2025-02-19
    FLORES RAFAEL
    Director
    $186,067
    @ $97.93 · 2025-02-19
    MOEHN MICHAEL L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $598,975
    @ $92.15 · 2024-11-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    GS
    5
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $76.92M
    LESLIE ERICKA T
    Officer
    $229,305
    @ $917.22 · 2026-10-28
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.93M
    @ $910.72 · 2026-10-27
    LESLIE ERICKA T
    Officer
    $222,562
    @ $890.25 · 2026-10-22
    LESLIE ERICKA T
    Officer
    $620,280
    @ $1033.80 · 2026-08-28
    LESLIE ERICKA T
    Officer
    $184,445
    @ $1053.97 · 2026-08-04
    LESLIE ERICKA T
    Officer
    $287,951
    @ $1151.80 · 2026-07-15
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $6.68M
    @ $973.55 · 2026-05-14
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $13.42M
    @ $939.07 · 2026-05-06
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $9.57M
    @ $929.17 · 2026-05-01
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $634,927
    @ $929.61 · 2026-05-01
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.23M
    @ $930.70 · 2026-05-01
    GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $936.18 · 2026-04-23
    GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $919.19 · 2026-04-17
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.94M
    @ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $255,387
    @ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $2.64M
    @ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $4.49M
    @ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $8.89M
    @ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $1.62M
    @ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
    WALDRON JOHN E.
    President
    $13.69M
    @ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.41M
    @ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
    ROGERS JOHN F W
    Officer
    $4.31M
    @ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.71M
    @ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.04M
    @ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
    GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
    Officer
    $3.31M
    @ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer and Treasurer
    $2.32M
    @ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $1.28M
    @ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $4.76M
    @ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $965,120
    @ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.00M
    @ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
    VINIAR DAVID A
    Director
    $3.06M
    @ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $1.77M
    @ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $7.67M
    @ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
    ROGERS JOHN F W
    Officer
    $3.83M
    @ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    AEE
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(63/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    GS
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(48/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    AEE
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
    GS
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
    View AEE Full AnalysisView GS Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: AEE vs GS

    Is Ameren Corporation or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, GS trades at a 43.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1584 vs. price $895), compared to AEE's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $111).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Ameren Corporation or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.?▼

    GS scores 65/100 (Narrow moat), while AEE scores 39/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in financial distress?▼

    GS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. AEE scores 0.9 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Ameren Corporation or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.?▼

    AEE earns 4.7% ROIC versus GS's 2.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Ameren Corporation's or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s?▼

    GS's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to AEE's 59/100 (Borderline). GS has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.