Compare Stocks › AEE vs GOOGL

Ameren Corporation (AEE) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, AEE is overvalued at $111, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. Of the two, AEE has the wider margin of safety.

AEE
Ameren Corporation
$110.54
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84

Rewards

AEE
    GOOGL
    • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    AEE
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.73 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠High leverage (1.58x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 5.6x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    GOOGL

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      AEE
      GOOGL
      Valuation
      $-1.79B
      Free Cash Flow
      $-1.16B
      -5.84%
      FCF Yield
      -0.03%
      19.46
      Trailing P/E
      14.61
      19.05
      Forward P/E
      18.49
      Quality & Moat
      4.71%
      ROIC
      14.30%
      11.94%
      ROE
      44.29%
      52.41%
      Gross Margin
      60.86%
      2.73
      PEG Ratio
      0.98
      Balance Sheet Safety
      1.58
      Net Debt / Equity
      Net cash
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      5.57
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      -0.62
      2.71%
      Dividend Yield
      0.31%
      AEE: 1Ties: 2GOOGL: 9
      AEEGOOGL

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      AEE

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      GOOGL

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      AEE
      Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.
      GOOGL
      $9.18
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $288.67B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$2.65T
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      AEE
      Insufficient Data
      Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
      Current Price: $110.54
      Fair Value: $0.00
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      GOOGL
      3447.8% Overvalued
      Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $279.84
      Fair Value: $7.89
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      AEE

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      GOOGL

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      AEE
      39/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
      GOOGL
      89/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      AEE

      Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

      GOOGL
      -2.92
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      AEE
      Insiders 0.3%Institutions 90.5%Retail & Other 9.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,260
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      GOOGL
      Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
      No. of Institutional Holders7,451
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      AEE
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      GOOGL
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      AEE
      3
      Sells (3M)
      19
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $8.18M
      FLORES RAFAEL
      Director
      $26,171
      @ $105.53 · 2026-09-11
      MARTIN RYAN
      Officer
      $106,689
      @ $109.88 · 2026-08-20
      SHAW THERESA A
      Officer
      $35,402
      @ $108.93 · 2026-08-14
      MOEHN MICHAEL L
      Officer
      $708,240
      @ $108.96 · 2026-08-03
      SHAW THERESA A
      Officer
      $199,476
      @ $109.30 · 2026-05-14
      MOEHN MICHAEL L
      Officer
      $738,595
      @ $113.63 · 2026-05-01
      SCHUKAR SHAWN E
      Officer of Subsidiary Company
      $556,404
      @ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
      LINDGREN MARK C
      Officer of Subsidiary Company
      $231,844
      @ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
      LYONS MARTIN J JR
      Chief Executive Officer
      $3.00M
      @ $111.84 · 2026-03-03
      FLORES RAFAEL
      Director
      $178,432
      @ $111.52 · 2026-02-17
      MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
      Officer of Subsidiary Company
      $393,473
      @ $110.90 · 2026-02-17
      SHAW THERESA A
      Officer
      $36,364
      @ $111.89 · 2026-02-17
      MOEHN MICHAEL L
      Officer
      $673,400
      @ $103.60 · 2026-02-02
      FLORES RAFAEL
      Director
      $23,672
      @ $105.21 · 2025-11-17
      FLORES RAFAEL
      Director
      $65,930
      @ $105.32 · 2025-11-17
      SHAW THERESA A
      Officer
      $34,050
      @ $104.77 · 2025-11-14
      SMITH PATRICK E.
      Officer
      $251,939
      @ $104.80 · 2025-11-14
      HARSHMAN RICHARD J
      Director
      $262,250
      @ $104.90 · 2025-11-14
      MOEHN MICHAEL L
      Chief Financial Officer
      $659,360
      @ $101.44 · 2025-11-03
      LINDGREN MARK C
      Officer of Subsidiary Company
      $353,115
      @ $100.89 · 2025-09-12
      MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
      Officer of Subsidiary Company
      $149,250
      @ $99.50 · 2025-09-03
      MIZELL GWENDOLYN G.
      Officer of Subsidiary Company
      $101,790
      @ $101.79 · 2025-08-22
      MOEHN MICHAEL L
      Chief Financial Officer
      $666,510
      @ $102.54 · 2025-08-01
      MOEHN MICHAEL L
      Chief Financial Officer
      $641,030
      @ $98.62 · 2025-05-20
      SCHUKAR SHAWN E
      Officer of Subsidiary Company
      $492,276
      @ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
      LINDGREN MARK C
      Officer of Subsidiary Company
      $194,087
      @ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
      NWAMU CHONDA J.
      Officer
      $557,535
      @ $101.37 · 2025-03-04
      LYONS MARTIN J JR
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.54M
      @ $103.79 · 2025-03-04
      SHAW THERESA A
      Officer
      $99,530
      @ $99.53 · 2025-02-26
      MOEHN MICHAEL L
      Chief Financial Officer
      $634,010
      @ $97.54 · 2025-02-20
      IVEY CRAIG S
      Director
      $266,901
      @ $98.27 · 2025-02-19
      FLORES RAFAEL
      Director
      $186,067
      @ $97.93 · 2025-02-19
      MOEHN MICHAEL L
      Chief Financial Officer
      $598,975
      @ $92.15 · 2024-11-20
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      GOOGL
      0
      Sells (3M)
      0
      Sells (12M)
      No open market insider sales found.
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      AEE
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(63/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      GOOGL
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(23/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      AEE
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
      GOOGL
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
      View AEE Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: AEE vs GOOGL

      Is Ameren Corporation or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, AEE trades at a -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $0 vs. price $111), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Ameren Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

      GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while AEE scores 39/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Ameren Corporation in financial distress?▼

      AEE's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Ameren Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

      Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) generates a -0.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Ameren Corporation's -5.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Ameren Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

      GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus AEE's 4.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Ameren Corporation's or Alphabet Inc.'s?▼

      GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to AEE's 59/100 (Borderline). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

      AEE vs GOOGL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io