Compare StocksADSK vs BAC

Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, ADSK is overvalued at $219, with a DCF intrinsic value of $172 and a margin of safety of -27%. BAC is undervalued at $58, with an intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of 59%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.
$218.64
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$58.18

Rewards

ADSK
  • Autodesk, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 92.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Autodesk, Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.88 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

ADSK
  • FCF yield of 6.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ADSK
BAC
Valuation
$3.16B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
6.91%
FCF Yield
N/A
28.36
Trailing P/E
13.44
15.40
Forward P/E
10.99
Quality & Moat
25.38%
ROIC
4.37%
53.85%
ROE
11.20%
92.50%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.85
PEG Ratio
0.88
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.20
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.21%
ADSK: 3Ties: 2BAC: 3
ADSKBAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ADSK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ADSK
$-1.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$3.14B
Δ Market Cap
$-6.00B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ADSK
27.4% Overvalued
Price is 27.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $218.64
Fair Value: $171.57
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BAC
59.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $58.18
Fair Value: $142.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ADSK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $219?

+15.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +3.2%

The market implies +15.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +3.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ADSK
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ADSK
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ADSK
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 101.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,876
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BAC
Insiders 7.0%Institutions 71.3%Retail & Other 21.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,542
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ADSK
1
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.17M
CAHILL JOHN T
Director
$378,400
@ $189.20 · 2026-06-23
ANAGNOST ANDREW J
Chief Executive Officer
$498,544
@ $202.66 · 2026-06-16
MOORJANI JANESH
Chief Financial Officer
$494,175
@ $197.67 · 2026-06-15
SMITH STACY J
Director
$794,054
@ $231.17 · 2026-05-29
CAHILL JOHN T
Director
$534,194
@ $267.10 · 2025-03-21
HOPE STEPHEN W.
Officer
$14,876
@ $275.48 · 2024-09-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ADSK
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $298,025
HOWARD AYANNA MACCALLA
Director
$298,025
@ $325.00 · 2025-09-29
KEENE RUTH ANN
Officer
$869,991
@ $315.10 · 2025-09-03
PEARCE REBECCA
Officer
$1.98M
@ $323.06 · 2025-08-29
HOWARD AYANNA MACCALLA
Director
$1.03M
@ $325.00 · 2025-08-29
PEARCE REBECCA
Officer
$1.02M
@ $315.00 · 2025-07-03
PEARCE REBECCA
Officer
$964,100
@ $310.00 · 2025-06-30
PEARCE REBECCA
Officer
$775,920
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-24
PEARCE REBECCA
Officer
$145,800
@ $300.00 · 2025-06-17
HOPE STEPHEN W.
Officer
$14,887
@ $261.18 · 2025-04-01
HOPE STEPHEN W.
Officer
$655,395
@ $267.29 · 2025-03-28
NORRINGTON LORRIE M
Director
$542,948
@ $305.37 · 2024-12-11
NORRINGTON LORRIE M
Director
$543,926
@ $305.92 · 2024-12-06
MCDOWELL MARY THERESE
Director
$167,783
@ $305.06 · 2024-11-15
MCDOWELL MARY THERESE
Director
$156,920
@ $285.31 · 2024-10-15
HOPE STEPHEN W.
Officer
$14,829
@ $274.61 · 2024-10-01
HOPE STEPHEN W.
Officer
$14,829
@ $274.61 · 2024-10-01
HOPE STEPHEN W.
Officer
$78,604
@ $274.84 · 2024-09-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ADSK
FearGreed
😨Fear(29/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ADSK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (29)
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
View ADSK Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ADSK vs BAC

Is Autodesk, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 59.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $142 vs. price $58), compared to ADSK's -27.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $172 vs. $219).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Autodesk, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while ADSK scores 99/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ADSK scores 3.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Autodesk, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?

ADSK earns 25.4% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

ADSK vs BAC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io