Compare Stocks › ADSK vs BAC

Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-02, ADSK is overvalued at $250, with a DCF intrinsic value of $172 and a margin of safety of -45%. BAC is undervalued at $50, with an intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of 72%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.
$249.61
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$50.01

Rewards

ADSK
  • ★Autodesk, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 92.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Autodesk, Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
BAC
  • ★Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

ADSK
  • ⚠FCF yield of 6.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
BAC
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ADSK
BAC
Valuation
$3.16B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
6.05%
FCF Yield
N/A
32.37
Trailing P/E
11.94
17.58
Forward P/E
9.64
Quality & Moat
25.38%
ROIC
3.80%
53.85%
ROE
10.73%
92.50%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.84
PEG Ratio
0.91
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.20
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.56%
ADSK: 4Ties: 1BAC: 3
ADSKBAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ADSK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ADSK
$0.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$3.14B
Δ Market Cap
+$569.1M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ADSK
45.5% Overvalued
Price is 45.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $249.61
Fair Value: $171.57
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BAC
72.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 72.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $50.01
Fair Value: $180.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ADSK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $250?

+17.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.0%

The market implies +17.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +5.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ADSK
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ADSK
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ADSK
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 101.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,883
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BAC
Insiders 7.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 21.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,517
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ADSK
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.17M
CAHILL JOHN T
Director
$378,400
@ $189.20 · 2026-06-23
ANAGNOST ANDREW J
Chief Executive Officer
$498,544
@ $202.66 · 2026-06-16
MOORJANI JANESH
Chief Financial Officer
$494,175
@ $197.67 · 2026-06-15
SMITH STACY J
Director
$794,054
@ $231.17 · 2026-05-29
CAHILL JOHN T
Director
$534,194
@ $267.10 · 2025-03-21
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ADSK
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
HOWARD AYANNA MACCALLA
Director
$298,025
@ $325.00 · 2025-09-29
KEENE RUTH ANN
Officer
$869,991
@ $315.10 · 2025-09-03
HOWARD AYANNA MACCALLA
Director
$1.03M
@ $325.00 · 2025-08-29
PEARCE REBECCA
Officer
$1.98M
@ $323.06 · 2025-08-29
PEARCE REBECCA
Officer
$1.02M
@ $315.00 · 2025-07-03
PEARCE REBECCA
Officer
$964,100
@ $310.00 · 2025-06-30
PEARCE REBECCA
Officer
$775,920
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-24
PEARCE REBECCA
Officer
$145,800
@ $300.00 · 2025-06-17
HOPE STEPHEN W.
Officer
$14,887
@ $261.18 · 2025-04-01
HOPE STEPHEN W.
Officer
$655,395
@ $267.29 · 2025-03-28
NORRINGTON LORRIE M
Director
$542,948
@ $305.37 · 2024-12-11
NORRINGTON LORRIE M
Director
$543,926
@ $305.92 · 2024-12-06
MCDOWELL MARY THERESE
Director
$167,783
@ $305.06 · 2024-11-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ADSK
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BAC
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ADSK
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
BAC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
View ADSK Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ADSK vs BAC

Is Autodesk, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 72.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $50), compared to ADSK's -45.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $172 vs. $250).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Autodesk, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?▼

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while ADSK scores 99/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?▼

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ADSK scores 4.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Autodesk, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?▼

ADSK earns 25.4% ROIC versus BAC's 3.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

ADSK vs BAC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io