Compare StocksADSK vs BAC

Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ADSK is overvalued at $234, with a DCF intrinsic value of $173 and a margin of safety of -36%. BAC is undervalued at $62, with an intrinsic value of $966181785898 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.
$234.20
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$61.95

Rewards

ADSK
  • Autodesk, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 92.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Autodesk, Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

ADSK
  • FCF yield of 6.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.14 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ADSK
BAC
Valuation
$3.06B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
6.19%
FCF Yield
N/A
34.24
Trailing P/E
14.31
16.43
Forward P/E
11.74
Quality & Moat
29.61%
ROIC
4.37%
50.40%
ROE
11.20%
92.43%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.90
PEG Ratio
1.06
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.09
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.07%
ADSK: 4Ties: 1BAC: 3
ADSKBAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ADSK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ADSK
$-0.86
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$3.14B
Δ Market Cap
$-2.70B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BAC
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.88
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ADSK
35.6% Overvalued
Price is 35.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $234.20
Fair Value: $172.70
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BAC
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $61.95
Fair Value: $966181785897.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ADSK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $234?

+17.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.7%

The market implies +17.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ADSK
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ADSK
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ADSK
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 97.7%Retail & Other 2.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,929
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BAC
Insiders 7.4%Institutions 71.4%Retail & Other 21.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,431
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ADSK
4
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.17M
CAHILL JOHN T
Director
$378,400
@ $189.20 · 2026-06-23
ANAGNOST ANDREW J
Chief Executive Officer
$498,544
@ $202.66 · 2026-06-16
MOORJANI JANESH
Chief Financial Officer
$494,175
@ $197.67 · 2026-06-15
SMITH STACY J
Director
$794,054
@ $231.17 · 2026-05-29
CAHILL JOHN T
Director
$534,194
@ $267.10 · 2025-03-21
HOPE STEPHEN W.
Officer
$14,876
@ $275.48 · 2024-09-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ADSK
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.17M
HOWARD AYANNA MACCALLA
Director
$298,025
@ $325.00 · 2025-09-29
KEENE RUTH ANN
Officer
$869,991
@ $315.10 · 2025-09-03
HOWARD AYANNA MACCALLA
Director
$1.03M
@ $325.00 · 2025-08-29
PEARCE REBECCA
Officer
$1.98M
@ $323.06 · 2025-08-29
PEARCE REBECCA
Officer
$1.02M
@ $315.00 · 2025-07-03
PEARCE REBECCA
Officer
$964,100
@ $310.00 · 2025-06-30
PEARCE REBECCA
Officer
$775,920
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-24
PEARCE REBECCA
Officer
$145,800
@ $300.00 · 2025-06-17
HOPE STEPHEN W.
Officer
$14,887
@ $261.18 · 2025-04-01
HOPE STEPHEN W.
Officer
$655,395
@ $267.29 · 2025-03-28
NORRINGTON LORRIE M
Director
$542,948
@ $305.37 · 2024-12-11
NORRINGTON LORRIE M
Director
$543,926
@ $305.92 · 2024-12-06
MCDOWELL MARY THERESE
Director
$167,783
@ $305.06 · 2024-11-15
MCDOWELL MARY THERESE
Director
$156,920
@ $285.31 · 2024-10-15
HOPE STEPHEN W.
Officer
$14,829
@ $274.61 · 2024-10-01
HOPE STEPHEN W.
Officer
$14,829
@ $274.61 · 2024-10-01
HOPE STEPHEN W.
Officer
$78,604
@ $274.84 · 2024-09-30
MCDOWELL MARY THERESE
Director
$146,025
@ $265.50 · 2024-09-16
MCDOWELL MARY THERESE
Director
$136,499
@ $248.18 · 2024-08-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ADSK
FearGreed
😐Neutral(43/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ADSK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
View ADSK Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ADSK vs BAC

Is Autodesk, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $966181785898 vs. price $62), compared to ADSK's -35.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $173 vs. $234).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Autodesk, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while ADSK scores 99/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ADSK scores 4.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Autodesk, Inc. or Bank of America Corporation?

ADSK earns 29.6% ROIC versus BAC's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

ADSK vs BAC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io