Compare StocksADM vs BAC

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC)

ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
$68.64
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$47.01

Rewards

ADM
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 24.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 12% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • FCF yield of 12.7% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
BAC
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.37 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.58 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

ADM
  • ROIC has declined by 6.2 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 6.3% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Trailing P/E of 30.8x is 99% above the historical average of 15.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Bank of America Corporation scores only 20/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ADM
BAC
Valuation
$4.20B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
12.73%
FCF Yield
N/A
30.78
Trailing P/E
12.34
14.41
Forward P/E
9.49
Quality & Moat
3.52%
ROIC
4.61%
4.68%
ROE
N/A
6.27%
Gross Margin
0.00%
N/A
PEG Ratio
0.58
Balance Sheet Safety
0.42
Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.46
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
3.03%
Dividend Yield
2.38%
ADM: 2Ties: 1BAC: 3
ADMBAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ADM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ADM
$-6.80
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$3.41B
Δ Market Cap
$-23.19B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ADM
11.6% Overvalued
Price is 11.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $68.64
Fair Value: $61.49
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BAC
64.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 64.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $47.01
Fair Value: $131.82
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ADM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $69?

+16.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -2.0%

The market implies +16.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -2.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ADM
44/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BAC
20/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ADM
-2.99
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ADM
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 88.0%Retail & Other 11.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,404
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 71.2%Retail & Other 21.5%
No. of Institutional Holders4,445
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ADM
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $486,720
MCATEE DAVID R. II
Director
$486,720
@ $64.90 · 2026-02-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ADM
4
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.11M
PINNER IAN R
Officer
$2.44M
@ $71.53 · 2026-03-13
CUDDY CHRISTOPHER M
Officer
$2.57M
@ $73.50 · 2026-03-13
MORRIS GREGORY A
Officer
$3.42M
@ $68.48 · 2026-03-10
WEBER JENNIFER L
Officer
$1.68M
@ $67.04 · 2026-02-17
LUCIANO JUAN R
Chief Executive Officer
$10.30M
@ $60.51 · 2024-09-03
LUCIANO JUAN R
Chief Executive Officer
$2.77M
@ $61.00 · 2024-08-30
LUCIANO JUAN R
Chief Executive Officer
$6.09M
@ $61.05 · 2024-08-29
LUCIANO JUAN R
Chief Executive Officer
$224,673
@ $61.00 · 2024-08-28
LUCIANO JUAN R
Chief Executive Officer
$349,011
@ $61.01 · 2024-08-26
STRADER FRUIT MOLLY L
Officer
$419,280
@ $60.73 · 2024-05-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BAC
5
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ADM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(47/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ADM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
View ADM Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis