Compare StocksADM vs BAC

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC)

ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
$74.94
VS
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$53.24

Rewards

ADM
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 24.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 12% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • FCF yield of 11.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.54 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

ADM
  • ROIC has declined by 6.2 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 6.3% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Trailing P/E of 33.6x is 117% above the historical average of 15.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $20.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ADM
BAC
Valuation
$4.20B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
11.64%
FCF Yield
N/A
33.61
Trailing P/E
13.24
15.41
Forward P/E
10.56
Quality & Moat
3.52%
ROIC
3.89%
4.68%
ROE
N/A
6.27%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.97
PEG Ratio
0.54
Balance Sheet Safety
0.42
Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.46
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
2.78%
Dividend Yield
2.10%
ADM: 2Ties: 1BAC: 4
ADMBAC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ADM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ADM
$-6.80
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$3.41B
Δ Market Cap
$-23.19B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ADM
35.1% Overvalued
Price is 35.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $74.94
Fair Value: $55.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BAC
59.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 59.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $53.24
Fair Value: $130.24
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ADM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $75?

+17.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -0.9%

The market implies +17.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -0.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ADM
44/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ADM
-2.99
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ADM
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 81.6%Retail & Other 17.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,427
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BAC
Insiders 7.4%Institutions 71.5%Retail & Other 21.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,375
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ADM
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $486,720
MCATEE DAVID R. II
Director
$486,720
@ $64.90 · 2026-02-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ADM
4
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.11M
CUDDY CHRISTOPHER M
Officer
$2.57M
@ $73.50 · 2026-03-13
PINNER IAN R
Officer
$2.44M
@ $71.53 · 2026-03-13
MORRIS GREGORY A
Officer
$3.42M
@ $68.48 · 2026-03-10
WEBER JENNIFER L
Officer
$1.68M
@ $67.04 · 2026-02-17
LUCIANO JUAN R
Chief Executive Officer
$10.30M
@ $60.51 · 2024-09-03
LUCIANO JUAN R
Chief Executive Officer
$2.77M
@ $61.00 · 2024-08-30
LUCIANO JUAN R
Chief Executive Officer
$6.09M
@ $61.05 · 2024-08-29
LUCIANO JUAN R
Chief Executive Officer
$224,673
@ $61.00 · 2024-08-28
LUCIANO JUAN R
Chief Executive Officer
$349,011
@ $61.01 · 2024-08-26
STRADER FRUIT MOLLY L
Officer
$419,280
@ $60.73 · 2024-05-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BAC
5
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ADM
FearGreed
😏Greed(68/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ADM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
View ADM Full AnalysisView BAC Full Analysis
ADM vs BAC: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io