Compare StocksADI vs UNH

Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ADI is undervalued at $367, with a DCF intrinsic value of $182404526413 and a margin of safety of 100%. UNH is overvalued at $414, with an intrinsic value of $371 and a margin of safety of -12%. Of the two, ADI has the wider margin of safety.

ADI
Analog Devices, Inc.
$367.41
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$414.40

Rewards

ADI
  • Gross margin of 64.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • PEG ratio of 0.67 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

ADI
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.84 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $41.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 19.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 6.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ADI
UNH
Valuation
$3.87B
Free Cash Flow
$22.76B
N/A
FCF Yield
6.05%
54.67
Trailing P/E
31.25
24.39
Forward P/E
18.47
Quality & Moat
9.03%
ROIC
14.15%
9.64%
ROE
14.15%
64.49%
Gross Margin
19.51%
0.67
PEG Ratio
1.28
Balance Sheet Safety
0.16
Net Debt / Equity
0.40
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.86
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.73
1.20%
Dividend Yield
2.24%
ADI: 4Ties: 1UNH: 6
ADIUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ADI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ADI
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$1.82B
Δ Market Cap
+$107.17
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ADI
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $367.41
Fair Value: $168150805218.98
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
11.7% Overvalued
Price is 11.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $414.40
Fair Value: $370.88
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ADI

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $367?

-30.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -30.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $414?

+14.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.6%

The market implies +14.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ADI
36/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ADI
-2.75
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ADI
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 93.0%Retail & Other 6.8%
No. of Institutional Holders2,876
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 86.1%Retail & Other 13.6%
No. of Institutional Holders4,164
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ADI
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ADI
7
Sells (3M)
34
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $94.80M
GOLZ KAREN M.
Director
$389,830
@ $389.83 · 2026-07-13
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.90M
@ $389.75 · 2026-07-01
GOLZ KAREN M.
Director
$411,950
@ $411.95 · 2026-06-12
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$573,982
@ $400.83 · 2026-06-09
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$7.35M
@ $418.00 · 2026-06-02
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$4.04M
@ $404.25 · 2026-06-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$24.36M
@ $405.97 · 2026-05-26
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.98M
@ $397.91 · 2026-05-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.18M
@ $318.14 · 2026-04-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$2.00M
@ $319.40 · 2026-03-11
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.50M
@ $350.00 · 2026-03-02
SONDEL MICHAEL
Officer
$1.52M
@ $361.11 · 2026-02-25
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$2.00M
@ $319.39 · 2026-02-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.07M
@ $306.92 · 2026-02-02
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.85M
@ $296.44 · 2026-01-14
NAKAMURA KATSUFUMI
Officer
$150,732
@ $301.46 · 2026-01-09
NAKAMURA KATSUFUMI
Officer
$144,582
@ $289.16 · 2026-01-07
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$2.78M
@ $278.44 · 2026-01-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.75M
@ $275.07 · 2026-01-02
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$1.36M
@ $271.19 · 2025-12-17
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.73M
@ $276.45 · 2025-12-17
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.82M
@ $282.42 · 2025-12-12
SONDEL MICHAEL
Officer
$2.28M
@ $279.50 · 2025-12-10
JAIN VIVEK
Officer
$1.57M
@ $265.88 · 2025-12-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.46M
@ $232.86 · 2025-11-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.35M
@ $234.95 · 2025-11-03
FRANK EDWARD H
Director
$242,740
@ $242.74 · 2025-10-06
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.51M
@ $241.64 · 2025-10-02
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.44M
@ $243.71 · 2025-10-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.55M
@ $248.27 · 2025-09-18
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$3.08M
@ $246.25 · 2025-09-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.46M
@ $246.50 · 2025-09-02
NAKAMURA KATSUFUMI
Officer
$617,595
@ $248.03 · 2025-08-21
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.38M
@ $220.64 · 2025-08-06
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.50M
@ $240.13 · 2025-07-17
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.45M
@ $232.57 · 2025-06-12
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.23M
@ $196.86 · 2025-05-07
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$1.97M
@ $196.84 · 2025-05-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.11M
@ $177.49 · 2025-04-16
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.00M
@ $200.26 · 2025-04-01
JAIN VIVEK
Officer
$2.66M
@ $210.00 · 2025-03-24
PUCCIO RICHARD C. JR.
Chief Financial Officer
$836,760
@ $209.19 · 2025-03-19
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.09M
@ $209.12 · 2025-03-12
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.10M
@ $210.44 · 2025-03-11
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$469,920
@ $224.52 · 2025-03-05
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$1.36M
@ $227.12 · 2025-03-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.62 · 2025-03-03
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.35M
@ $234.82 · 2025-02-26
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.15M
@ $215.49 · 2025-01-02
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.16M
@ $215.83 · 2024-12-11
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.24M
@ $223.87 · 2024-11-01
BRYANT GREGORY M.
Officer
$4.48M
@ $223.87 · 2024-11-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.29M
@ $228.93 · 2024-10-01
BRYANT GREGORY M.
Officer
$6.87M
@ $228.93 · 2024-10-01
BRYANT GREGORY M.
Officer
$6.72M
@ $224.10 · 2024-09-25
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.29M
@ $228.69 · 2024-09-03
FRANK EDWARD H
Director
$233,133
@ $234.30 · 2024-08-29
FRANK EDWARD H
Director
$113,618
@ $227.24 · 2024-08-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $284,000
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ADI
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ADI
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View ADI Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ADI vs UNH

Is Analog Devices, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ADI trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $182404526413 vs. price $367), compared to UNH's -11.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $371 vs. $414).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Analog Devices, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while ADI scores 36/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Analog Devices, Inc. in financial distress?

ADI's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. UNH scores 2.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Analog Devices, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH earns 14.1% ROIC versus ADI's 9.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Analog Devices, Inc.'s or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's?

UNH's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to ADI's 64/100 (Safe). UNH has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.