Compare StocksADI vs QCOM

Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ADI is undervalued at $367, with a DCF intrinsic value of $182404526413 and a margin of safety of 100%. QCOM is overvalued at $148, with an intrinsic value of $127 and a margin of safety of -16%. Of the two, ADI has the wider margin of safety.

ADI
Analog Devices, Inc.
$367.41
VS
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$147.61

Rewards

ADI
  • Gross margin of 64.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • PEG ratio of 0.67 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

ADI
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.84 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $41.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
QCOM
  • FCF yield of 6.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 15 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ADI
QCOM
Valuation
$3.87B
Free Cash Flow
$10.24B
N/A
FCF Yield
6.61%
54.67
Trailing P/E
16.87
24.39
Forward P/E
14.34
Quality & Moat
9.03%
ROIC
15.03%
9.64%
ROE
33.75%
64.49%
Gross Margin
54.23%
0.67
PEG Ratio
0.63
Balance Sheet Safety
0.16
Net Debt / Equity
0.25
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.86
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.58
1.20%
Dividend Yield
2.49%
ADI: 2Ties: 1QCOM: 8
ADIQCOM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ADI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ADI
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$1.82B
Δ Market Cap
+$107.17
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ADI
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $367.41
Fair Value: $168150805218.98
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
QCOM
84.2% Overvalued
Price is 84.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $147.61
Fair Value: $80.13
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ADI

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $367?

-30.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -30.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $148?

+11.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.5%

The market implies +11.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ADI
36/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ADI
-2.75
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ADI
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 93.0%Retail & Other 6.8%
No. of Institutional Holders2,876
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.5%Retail & Other 15.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,722
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ADI
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ADI
7
Sells (3M)
34
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $94.80M
GOLZ KAREN M.
Director
$389,830
@ $389.83 · 2026-07-13
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.90M
@ $389.75 · 2026-07-01
GOLZ KAREN M.
Director
$411,950
@ $411.95 · 2026-06-12
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$573,982
@ $400.83 · 2026-06-09
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$7.35M
@ $418.00 · 2026-06-02
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$4.04M
@ $404.25 · 2026-06-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$24.36M
@ $405.97 · 2026-05-26
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.98M
@ $397.91 · 2026-05-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.18M
@ $318.14 · 2026-04-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$2.00M
@ $319.40 · 2026-03-11
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.50M
@ $350.00 · 2026-03-02
SONDEL MICHAEL
Officer
$1.52M
@ $361.11 · 2026-02-25
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$2.00M
@ $319.39 · 2026-02-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.07M
@ $306.92 · 2026-02-02
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.85M
@ $296.44 · 2026-01-14
NAKAMURA KATSUFUMI
Officer
$150,732
@ $301.46 · 2026-01-09
NAKAMURA KATSUFUMI
Officer
$144,582
@ $289.16 · 2026-01-07
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$2.78M
@ $278.44 · 2026-01-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.75M
@ $275.07 · 2026-01-02
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$1.36M
@ $271.19 · 2025-12-17
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.73M
@ $276.45 · 2025-12-17
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.82M
@ $282.42 · 2025-12-12
SONDEL MICHAEL
Officer
$2.28M
@ $279.50 · 2025-12-10
JAIN VIVEK
Officer
$1.57M
@ $265.88 · 2025-12-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.46M
@ $232.86 · 2025-11-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.35M
@ $234.95 · 2025-11-03
FRANK EDWARD H
Director
$242,740
@ $242.74 · 2025-10-06
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.51M
@ $241.64 · 2025-10-02
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.44M
@ $243.71 · 2025-10-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.55M
@ $248.27 · 2025-09-18
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$3.08M
@ $246.25 · 2025-09-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.46M
@ $246.50 · 2025-09-02
NAKAMURA KATSUFUMI
Officer
$617,595
@ $248.03 · 2025-08-21
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.38M
@ $220.64 · 2025-08-06
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.50M
@ $240.13 · 2025-07-17
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.45M
@ $232.57 · 2025-06-12
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.23M
@ $196.86 · 2025-05-07
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$1.97M
@ $196.84 · 2025-05-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.11M
@ $177.49 · 2025-04-16
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.00M
@ $200.26 · 2025-04-01
JAIN VIVEK
Officer
$2.66M
@ $210.00 · 2025-03-24
PUCCIO RICHARD C. JR.
Chief Financial Officer
$836,760
@ $209.19 · 2025-03-19
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.09M
@ $209.12 · 2025-03-12
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.10M
@ $210.44 · 2025-03-11
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$469,920
@ $224.52 · 2025-03-05
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$1.36M
@ $227.12 · 2025-03-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.62 · 2025-03-03
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.35M
@ $234.82 · 2025-02-26
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.15M
@ $215.49 · 2025-01-02
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.16M
@ $215.83 · 2024-12-11
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.24M
@ $223.87 · 2024-11-01
BRYANT GREGORY M.
Officer
$4.48M
@ $223.87 · 2024-11-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.29M
@ $228.93 · 2024-10-01
BRYANT GREGORY M.
Officer
$6.87M
@ $228.93 · 2024-10-01
BRYANT GREGORY M.
Officer
$6.72M
@ $224.10 · 2024-09-25
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.29M
@ $228.69 · 2024-09-03
FRANK EDWARD H
Director
$233,133
@ $234.30 · 2024-08-29
FRANK EDWARD H
Director
$113,618
@ $227.24 · 2024-08-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
QCOM
3
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.57M
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$452,030
@ $180.81 · 2026-07-14
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,380
@ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$529,741
@ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$325,854
@ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$330,815
@ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$458,799
@ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$577,620
@ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.20M
@ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$2.83M
@ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$567,702
@ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.38M
@ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$522,808
@ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$122,463
@ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,610
@ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$537,560
@ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$486,965
@ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$120,808
@ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$465,846
@ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$91,442
@ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$119,900
@ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$235,262
@ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$523,292
@ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$130,074
@ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$509,397
@ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$3.28M
@ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$463,851
@ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$409,056
@ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$1.67M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.24M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$484,617
@ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$202,120
@ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$491,349
@ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.38M
@ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$313,779
@ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ADI
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
QCOM
FearGreed
😨Fear(27/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ADI
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
QCOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (27)
View ADI Full AnalysisView QCOM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ADI vs QCOM

Is Analog Devices, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ADI trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $182404526413 vs. price $367), compared to QCOM's -15.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $127 vs. $148).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Analog Devices, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while ADI scores 36/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Analog Devices, Inc. in financial distress?

ADI's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. QCOM scores 6.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Analog Devices, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

QCOM earns 15.0% ROIC versus ADI's 9.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Analog Devices, Inc.'s or QUALCOMM Incorporated's?

QCOM's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to ADI's 64/100 (Safe). QCOM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

ADI vs QCOM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io