Compare StocksADI vs NVDA

Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ADI is overvalued at $434, with a DCF intrinsic value of $345 and a margin of safety of -26%. NVDA is overvalued at $211, with an intrinsic value of $163 and a margin of safety of -29%. Of the two, ADI has the wider margin of safety.

ADI
Analog Devices, Inc.
$434.46
VS
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$210.69

Rewards

ADI
  • Gross margin of 64.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • Altman Z-Score of 6.46 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
NVDA
  • NVIDIA Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 74.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 193.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

ADI
  • FCF yield of 1.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 64.5x is 40% above the historical average of 46.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $43.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
NVDA
  • FCF yield of 1.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Beneish M-Score of -1.06 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
  • 39 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ADI
NVDA
Valuation
$3.87B
Free Cash Flow
$96.68B
1.83%
FCF Yield
1.89%
64.46
Trailing P/E
32.26
29.41
Forward P/E
16.55
Quality & Moat
9.03%
ROIC
63.06%
9.64%
ROE
114.29%
64.49%
Gross Margin
74.14%
0.91
PEG Ratio
0.64
Balance Sheet Safety
0.16
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.86
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.24
1.01%
Dividend Yield
0.02%
ADI: 1Ties: 2NVDA: 9
ADINVDA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ADI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NVDA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ADI
$27.09
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.82B
Δ Market Cap
+$49.25B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NVDA
$17.68
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$220.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.90T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ADI
36.7% Overvalued
Price is 36.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $434.46
Fair Value: $317.89
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NVDA
44.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 44.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $210.69
Fair Value: $378.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ADI

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $434?

+22.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +21.8%

The market implies +22.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +21.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

NVDA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $211?

+17.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.8%

The market implies +17.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ADI
36/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NVDA
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ADI
-2.75
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NVDA
-1.06
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ADI
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 6.2%
No. of Institutional Holders2,790
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NVDA
Insiders 4.0%Institutions 70.9%Retail & Other 25.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,556
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ADI
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NVDA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ADI
7
Sells (3M)
33
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $92.01M
GOLZ KAREN M.
Director
$411,950
@ $411.95 · 2026-06-12
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$573,982
@ $400.83 · 2026-06-09
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$7.35M
@ $418.00 · 2026-06-02
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$4.04M
@ $404.25 · 2026-06-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$24.36M
@ $405.97 · 2026-05-26
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.98M
@ $397.91 · 2026-05-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.18M
@ $318.14 · 2026-04-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$2.00M
@ $319.40 · 2026-03-11
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.50M
@ $350.00 · 2026-03-02
SONDEL MICHAEL
Officer
$1.52M
@ $361.11 · 2026-02-25
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$2.00M
@ $319.39 · 2026-02-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.07M
@ $306.92 · 2026-02-02
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.85M
@ $296.44 · 2026-01-14
NAKAMURA KATSUFUMI
Officer
$150,732
@ $301.46 · 2026-01-09
NAKAMURA KATSUFUMI
Officer
$144,582
@ $289.16 · 2026-01-07
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$2.78M
@ $278.44 · 2026-01-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.75M
@ $275.07 · 2026-01-02
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$1.36M
@ $271.19 · 2025-12-17
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.73M
@ $276.45 · 2025-12-17
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.82M
@ $282.42 · 2025-12-12
SONDEL MICHAEL
Officer
$2.28M
@ $279.50 · 2025-12-10
JAIN VIVEK
Officer
$1.57M
@ $265.88 · 2025-12-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.46M
@ $232.86 · 2025-11-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.35M
@ $234.95 · 2025-11-03
FRANK EDWARD H
Director
$242,740
@ $242.74 · 2025-10-06
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.51M
@ $241.64 · 2025-10-02
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.44M
@ $243.71 · 2025-10-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.55M
@ $248.27 · 2025-09-18
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$3.08M
@ $246.25 · 2025-09-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.46M
@ $246.50 · 2025-09-02
NAKAMURA KATSUFUMI
Officer
$617,595
@ $248.03 · 2025-08-21
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.38M
@ $220.64 · 2025-08-06
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.50M
@ $240.13 · 2025-07-17
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.45M
@ $232.57 · 2025-06-12
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.23M
@ $196.86 · 2025-05-07
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$1.97M
@ $196.84 · 2025-05-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.11M
@ $177.49 · 2025-04-16
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.00M
@ $200.26 · 2025-04-01
JAIN VIVEK
Officer
$2.66M
@ $210.00 · 2025-03-24
PUCCIO RICHARD C. JR.
Chief Financial Officer
$836,760
@ $209.19 · 2025-03-19
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.09M
@ $209.12 · 2025-03-12
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.10M
@ $210.44 · 2025-03-11
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$1.36M
@ $227.12 · 2025-03-05
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$469,920
@ $224.52 · 2025-03-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.62 · 2025-03-03
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.35M
@ $234.82 · 2025-02-26
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.15M
@ $215.49 · 2025-01-02
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.16M
@ $215.83 · 2024-12-11
BRYANT GREGORY M.
Officer
$4.48M
@ $223.87 · 2024-11-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.24M
@ $223.87 · 2024-11-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.29M
@ $228.93 · 2024-10-01
BRYANT GREGORY M.
Officer
$6.87M
@ $228.93 · 2024-10-01
BRYANT GREGORY M.
Officer
$6.72M
@ $224.10 · 2024-09-25
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.29M
@ $228.69 · 2024-09-03
FRANK EDWARD H
Director
$233,133
@ $234.30 · 2024-08-29
FRANK EDWARD H
Director
$113,618
@ $227.24 · 2024-08-23
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.28M
@ $228.08 · 2024-08-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.27M
@ $226.70 · 2024-07-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NVDA
1
Sells (3M)
39
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.09B
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$133,750
@ $214.00 · 2026-05-27
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$942,944
@ $174.75 · 2026-03-20
SHAH AARTI S
Director
$3.36M
@ $176.71 · 2026-03-19
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$555,440
@ $184.90 · 2026-03-13
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$15.19M
@ $189.85 · 2026-01-02
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$4.43M
@ $179.98 · 2025-12-19
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$112,317
@ $179.42 · 2025-11-24
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$5.20M
@ $207.91 · 2025-10-29
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$23.56M
@ $188.47 · 2025-10-28
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.73M
@ $181.04 · 2025-10-23
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$41.06M
@ $182.48 · 2025-10-20
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$41.34M
@ $183.73 · 2025-10-15
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$42.89M
@ $190.60 · 2025-10-10
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$42.05M
@ $186.89 · 2025-10-07
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$42.09M
@ $187.08 · 2025-10-02
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.23M
@ $178.82 · 2025-09-29
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.21M
@ $178.69 · 2025-09-24
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.18M
@ $174.14 · 2025-09-19
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$617,298
@ $176.37 · 2025-09-19
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.75M
@ $176.66 · 2025-09-16
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.28M
@ $174.59 · 2025-09-11
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.01M
@ $168.95 · 2025-09-08
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.61M
@ $171.60 · 2025-09-03
HUDSON BEACH DAWN E
Director
$15.38M
@ $170.90 · 2025-09-03
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$27.12M
@ $180.79 · 2025-08-15
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.96M
@ $182.04 · 2025-08-13
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.66M
@ $180.70 · 2025-08-08
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.78M
@ $176.80 · 2025-08-05
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.18M
@ $178.58 · 2025-07-31
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.16M
@ $174.02 · 2025-07-28
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.22M
@ $169.87 · 2025-07-23
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.71M
@ $172.05 · 2025-07-18
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$37.59M
@ $167.08 · 2025-07-15
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$36.43M
@ $161.91 · 2025-07-10
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$35.55M
@ $158.02 · 2025-07-07
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$35.16M
@ $156.27 · 2025-07-01
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$30.47M
@ $152.33 · 2025-06-26
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$14.40M
@ $144.04 · 2025-06-23
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$646,469
@ $143.66 · 2025-06-20
BURGESS ROBERT KENNETH
Director
$6.74M
@ $134.82 · 2025-05-30
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$91,608
@ $138.80 · 2025-05-30
KRESS COLETTE M.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.79M
@ $116.83 · 2025-03-21
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$525,585
@ $116.80 · 2025-03-21
SHAH AARTI S
Director
$2.37M
@ $118.42 · 2025-03-20
BURGESS ROBERT KENNETH
Director
$6.16M
@ $115.49 · 2025-03-13
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$292,930
@ $110.00 · 2025-03-10
KRESS COLETTE M.
Chief Financial Officer
$9.03M
@ $135.40 · 2024-12-13
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$608,775
@ $135.28 · 2024-12-13
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$101,672
@ $142.00 · 2024-11-25
KRESS COLETTE M.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.77M
@ $116.59 · 2024-09-20
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$524,293
@ $116.51 · 2024-09-20
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$28.55M
@ $118.97 · 2024-09-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ADI
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NVDA
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ADI
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
NVDA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
View ADI Full AnalysisView NVDA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ADI vs NVDA

Is Analog Devices, Inc. or NVIDIA Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ADI trades at a -26.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $345 vs. price $434), compared to NVDA's -29.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $163 vs. $211).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Analog Devices, Inc. or NVIDIA Corporation?

NVDA scores 69/100 (Narrow moat), while ADI scores 36/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Analog Devices, Inc. or NVIDIA Corporation?

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) generates a 1.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Analog Devices, Inc.'s 1.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Analog Devices, Inc. or NVIDIA Corporation?

NVDA earns 63.1% ROIC versus ADI's 9.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Analog Devices, Inc.'s or NVIDIA Corporation's?

NVDA's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to ADI's 64/100 (Safe). NVDA has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Does NVIDIA Corporation have accounting red flags?

NVDA's Beneish M-Score of -1.1 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, ADI scores -2.8, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.