Compare StocksADI vs MS

Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) vs Morgan Stanley (MS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ADI is overvalued at $434, with a DCF intrinsic value of $345 and a margin of safety of -26%. MS is undervalued at $223, with an intrinsic value of $298 and a margin of safety of 25%. Of the two, MS has the wider margin of safety.

ADI
Analog Devices, Inc.
$434.46
VS
MS
Morgan Stanley
$223.17

Rewards

ADI
  • Gross margin of 64.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • PEG ratio of 0.91 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • Altman Z-Score of 6.46 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
MS
  • Gross margin of 87.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

ADI
  • FCF yield of 1.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 64.5x is 40% above the historical average of 46.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $43.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
MS
  • Trailing P/E of 20.2x is 26% above the historical average of 16.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.66 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ADI
MS
Valuation
$3.87B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
1.83%
FCF Yield
N/A
64.46
Trailing P/E
20.21
29.41
Forward P/E
17.56
Quality & Moat
9.03%
ROIC
3.38%
9.64%
ROE
16.39%
64.49%
Gross Margin
87.39%
0.91
PEG Ratio
2.66
Balance Sheet Safety
0.16
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.86
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
1.01%
Dividend Yield
1.81%
ADI: 2Ties: 1MS: 6
ADIMS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ADI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ADI
$27.09
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.82B
Δ Market Cap
+$49.25B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ADI
36.7% Overvalued
Price is 36.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $434.46
Fair Value: $317.89
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MS
25.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 25.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $223.17
Fair Value: $297.53
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ADI

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $434?

+22.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +21.8%

The market implies +22.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +21.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ADI
36/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ADI
-2.75
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ADI
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 6.2%
No. of Institutional Holders2,790
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MS
Insiders 24.3%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 12.9%
No. of Institutional Holders3,208
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ADI
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ADI
7
Sells (3M)
33
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $92.01M
GOLZ KAREN M.
Director
$411,950
@ $411.95 · 2026-06-12
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$573,982
@ $400.83 · 2026-06-09
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$7.35M
@ $418.00 · 2026-06-02
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$4.04M
@ $404.25 · 2026-06-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$24.36M
@ $405.97 · 2026-05-26
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.98M
@ $397.91 · 2026-05-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.18M
@ $318.14 · 2026-04-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$2.00M
@ $319.40 · 2026-03-11
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.50M
@ $350.00 · 2026-03-02
SONDEL MICHAEL
Officer
$1.52M
@ $361.11 · 2026-02-25
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$2.00M
@ $319.39 · 2026-02-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.07M
@ $306.92 · 2026-02-02
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.85M
@ $296.44 · 2026-01-14
NAKAMURA KATSUFUMI
Officer
$150,732
@ $301.46 · 2026-01-09
NAKAMURA KATSUFUMI
Officer
$144,582
@ $289.16 · 2026-01-07
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$2.78M
@ $278.44 · 2026-01-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.75M
@ $275.07 · 2026-01-02
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$1.36M
@ $271.19 · 2025-12-17
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.73M
@ $276.45 · 2025-12-17
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.82M
@ $282.42 · 2025-12-12
SONDEL MICHAEL
Officer
$2.28M
@ $279.50 · 2025-12-10
JAIN VIVEK
Officer
$1.57M
@ $265.88 · 2025-12-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.46M
@ $232.86 · 2025-11-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.35M
@ $234.95 · 2025-11-03
FRANK EDWARD H
Director
$242,740
@ $242.74 · 2025-10-06
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.51M
@ $241.64 · 2025-10-02
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.44M
@ $243.71 · 2025-10-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.55M
@ $248.27 · 2025-09-18
COTTER MARTIN
Officer
$3.08M
@ $246.25 · 2025-09-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.46M
@ $246.50 · 2025-09-02
NAKAMURA KATSUFUMI
Officer
$617,595
@ $248.03 · 2025-08-21
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.38M
@ $220.64 · 2025-08-06
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.50M
@ $240.13 · 2025-07-17
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.45M
@ $232.57 · 2025-06-12
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.23M
@ $196.86 · 2025-05-07
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$1.97M
@ $196.84 · 2025-05-01
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$1.11M
@ $177.49 · 2025-04-16
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.00M
@ $200.26 · 2025-04-01
JAIN VIVEK
Officer
$2.66M
@ $210.00 · 2025-03-24
PUCCIO RICHARD C. JR.
Chief Financial Officer
$836,760
@ $209.19 · 2025-03-19
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.09M
@ $209.12 · 2025-03-12
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.10M
@ $210.44 · 2025-03-11
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$1.36M
@ $227.12 · 2025-03-05
STATA RAYMOND S
Director
$469,920
@ $224.52 · 2025-03-05
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.62 · 2025-03-03
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.35M
@ $234.82 · 2025-02-26
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.15M
@ $215.49 · 2025-01-02
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.16M
@ $215.83 · 2024-12-11
BRYANT GREGORY M.
Officer
$4.48M
@ $223.87 · 2024-11-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.24M
@ $223.87 · 2024-11-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.29M
@ $228.93 · 2024-10-01
BRYANT GREGORY M.
Officer
$6.87M
@ $228.93 · 2024-10-01
BRYANT GREGORY M.
Officer
$6.72M
@ $224.10 · 2024-09-25
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.29M
@ $228.69 · 2024-09-03
FRANK EDWARD H
Director
$233,133
@ $234.30 · 2024-08-29
FRANK EDWARD H
Director
$113,618
@ $227.24 · 2024-08-23
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.28M
@ $228.08 · 2024-08-01
ROCHE VINCENT T
Chief Executive Officer
$2.27M
@ $226.70 · 2024-07-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MS
4
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $70.42M
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$368,375
@ $105.25 · 2024-07-26
AKRAM RAJA
Officer
$797,764
@ $106.37 · 2024-07-18
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$106,621
@ $106.62 · 2024-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.26M
@ $106.54 · 2024-07-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ADI
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MS
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ADI
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
View ADI Full AnalysisView MS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ADI vs MS

Is Analog Devices, Inc. or Morgan Stanley more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MS trades at a 25.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $298 vs. price $223), compared to ADI's -26.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $345 vs. $434).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Analog Devices, Inc. or Morgan Stanley?

MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while ADI scores 36/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ADI scores 6.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Analog Devices, Inc. or Morgan Stanley?

ADI earns 9.0% ROIC versus MS's 3.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Analog Devices, Inc.'s or Morgan Stanley's?

MS's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to ADI's 64/100 (Safe). MS has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.