Compare StocksADBE vs TMO

Adobe Inc. (ADBE) vs Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc (TMO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ADBE is undervalued at $250, with a DCF intrinsic value of $554 and a margin of safety of 55%. TMO is undervalued at $574, with an intrinsic value of $151245065994 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, TMO has the wider margin of safety.

ADBE
Adobe Inc.
$250.41
VS
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc
$574.30

Rewards

ADBE
  • Adobe Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 89.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Adobe Inc. scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
TMO

    Risks

    ADBE
      TMO
      • Altman Z-Score of 1.54 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
      • 21 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      TMO
      Valuation
      $9.22B
      Free Cash Flow
      $6.24B
      9.26%
      FCF Yield
      N/A
      14.33
      Trailing P/E
      30.86
      9.11
      Forward P/E
      20.88
      Quality & Moat
      37.82%
      ROIC
      7.20%
      62.95%
      ROE
      13.51%
      89.40%
      Gross Margin
      40.99%
      0.68
      PEG Ratio
      1.87
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.13
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.73
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      0.15
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      3.28
      0.00%
      Dividend Yield
      0.33%
      ADBE: 9Ties: 1TMO: 1
      ADBETMO

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      ADBE

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      TMO

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      $-0.60
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $18.12B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-10.93B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      TMO
      $0.00
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Value Destroyer
      Σ Retained
      $17.29B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$28.76
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      54.8% Margin of Safety
      Price is 54.8% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $250.41
      Fair Value: $553.74
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      TMO
      100.0% Margin of Safety
      Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $574.30
      Fair Value: $151245065993.58
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      ADBE

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $250?

      +1.8%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies -0.6%

      The market implies +1.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

      Standard FCF implies a more demanding -0.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

      TMO

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $574?

      -12.7%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies -8.9%

      The market implies -12.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

      Standard FCF implies a more demanding -8.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      100/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      TMO
      60/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      -2.85
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      TMO
      -2.47
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      Insiders 0.2%Institutions 87.8%Retail & Other 12.0%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,051
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      TMO
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 6.4%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,509
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      1
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $1.95M
      RICKS DAVID A
      Director
      $1.95M
      @ $194.51 · 2026-06-25
      DURN DANIEL JAMES
      Chief Financial Officer
      $507,758
      @ $390.58 · 2025-03-20
      RICKS DAVID A
      Director
      $998,946
      @ $443.98 · 2025-01-28
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      TMO
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      CHAI NELSON J
      Director
      $11,038
      @ $551.90 · 2024-12-09
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      0
      Sells (3M)
      4
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $1.05M
      FORUSZ JILLIAN
      Officer
      $185,915
      @ $246.25 · 2026-04-30
      DURN DANIEL JAMES
      Chief Financial Officer
      $331,355
      @ $248.02 · 2026-04-20
      DURN DANIEL JAMES
      Chief Financial Officer
      $485,323
      @ $294.85 · 2026-01-27
      FORUSZ JILLIAN
      Officer
      $50,344
      @ $337.88 · 2025-10-31
      FORUSZ JILLIAN
      Officer
      $175,828
      @ $380.58 · 2025-05-02
      FORUSZ JILLIAN
      Officer
      $145,567
      @ $435.83 · 2025-01-28
      BELSKY SCOTT K
      Officer
      $2.05M
      @ $431.61 · 2025-01-27
      BANSE AMY L
      Director
      $333,300
      @ $550.00 · 2024-12-06
      FORUSZ JILLIAN
      Officer
      $327,987
      @ $485.19 · 2024-10-29
      BELSKY SCOTT K
      Officer
      $232,525
      @ $483.42 · 2024-10-25
      BELSKY SCOTT K
      Officer
      $1.14M
      @ $511.48 · 2024-10-16
      DURN DANIEL JAMES
      Chief Financial Officer
      $3.35M
      @ $515.44 · 2024-09-17
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      TMO
      1
      Sells (3M)
      21
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $110.60M
      PETTITI GIANLUCA
      President
      $226,000
      @ $565.00 · 2026-07-27
      PETTITI GIANLUCA
      President
      $185,064
      @ $462.66 · 2026-04-27
      SHAFER MICHAEL D
      Officer
      $802,536
      @ $499.40 · 2026-03-11
      CASPER MARC N
      Chief Executive Officer
      $2.06M
      @ $514.82 · 2026-03-05
      CASPER MARC N
      Chief Executive Officer
      $5.08M
      @ $507.75 · 2026-03-04
      PETTITI GIANLUCA
      Officer
      $216,480
      @ $541.20 · 2026-02-09
      LAGARDE MICHEL
      Chief Operating Officer
      $12.42M
      @ $563.56 · 2025-12-04
      LAGARDE MICHEL
      Chief Operating Officer
      $36.13M
      @ $582.68 · 2025-12-03
      LOWERY FREDERICK M.
      Officer
      $8.15M
      @ $589.81 · 2025-12-02
      SHAFER MICHAEL D
      Officer
      $6.43M
      @ $600.00 · 2025-11-25
      LAGARDE MICHEL
      Chief Operating Officer
      $2.76M
      @ $594.42 · 2025-11-13
      BRITT LISA P
      Officer
      $622,136
      @ $588.59 · 2025-11-12
      PETTITI GIANLUCA
      Officer
      $1.73M
      @ $580.00 · 2025-11-10
      BRITT LISA P
      Officer
      $5.84M
      @ $571.62 · 2025-11-07
      CASPER MARC N
      Chief Executive Officer
      $13.91M
      @ $571.33 · 2025-10-27
      PETTITI GIANLUCA
      Officer
      $229,660
      @ $574.15 · 2025-10-24
      CASPER MARC N
      Chief Executive Officer
      $200,201
      @ $500.50 · 2025-09-05
      HOLMES JOSEPH R.
      Officer
      $189,662
      @ $492.63 · 2025-08-29
      CASPER MARC N
      Chief Executive Officer
      $5.01M
      @ $500.96 · 2025-08-22
      CASPER MARC N
      Chief Executive Officer
      $248,046
      @ $500.09 · 2025-08-20
      CASPER MARC N
      Chief Executive Officer
      $8.15M
      @ $452.99 · 2025-08-07
      PETTITI GIANLUCA
      Officer
      $191,992
      @ $479.98 · 2025-07-25
      PETTITI GIANLUCA
      Officer
      $164,444
      @ $411.11 · 2025-05-12
      PETTITI GIANLUCA
      Officer
      $128,979
      @ $429.93 · 2025-04-28
      BOXER MICHAEL A
      General Counsel
      $2.01M
      @ $532.59 · 2025-03-10
      CASPER MARC N
      Chief Executive Officer
      $9.33M
      @ $518.16 · 2025-03-05
      SHAFER MICHAEL D
      Officer
      $945,038
      @ $530.92 · 2025-03-03
      LOWERY FREDERICK M.
      Officer
      $9.73M
      @ $531.81 · 2025-02-24
      CHAI NELSON J
      Director
      $8,449
      @ $528.06 · 2025-02-19
      PETTITI GIANLUCA
      Officer
      $175,677
      @ $585.59 · 2025-02-04
      WILLIAMSON STEPHEN
      Chief Financial Officer
      $11.58M
      @ $589.36 · 2025-02-04
      CASPER MARC N
      Chief Executive Officer
      $10.62M
      @ $531.23 · 2024-12-03
      CASPER MARC N
      Chief Executive Officer
      $3.26M
      @ $557.89 · 2024-11-01
      CASPER MARC N
      Chief Executive Officer
      $11.01M
      @ $550.51 · 2024-10-31
      CASPER MARC N
      Chief Executive Officer
      $11.05M
      @ $552.46 · 2024-10-29
      BOXER MICHAEL A
      General Counsel
      $1.12M
      @ $560.16 · 2024-10-25
      PETTITI GIANLUCA
      Officer
      $168,048
      @ $560.16 · 2024-10-25
      CASPER MARC N
      Chief Executive Officer
      $12.17M
      @ $608.45 · 2024-09-04
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(39/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      TMO
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(61/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      ADBE
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
      TMO
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
      View ADBE Full AnalysisView TMO Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: ADBE vs TMO

      Is Adobe Inc. or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, TMO trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $151245065994 vs. price $574), compared to ADBE's 54.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $554 vs. $250).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Adobe Inc. or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc?

      ADBE scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while TMO scores 60/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc in financial distress?

      TMO's Altman Z-Score of 1.5 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ADBE scores 8.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Adobe Inc. or Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc?

      ADBE earns 37.8% ROIC versus TMO's 7.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.