Compare StocksADBE vs ROP

Adobe Inc. (ADBE) vs Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ADBE is undervalued at $195, with a DCF intrinsic value of $558 and a margin of safety of 65%. ROP is undervalued at $330, with an intrinsic value of $422 and a margin of safety of 22%. Of the two, ADBE has the wider margin of safety.

ADBE
Adobe Inc.
$195.16
VS
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.
$330.25

Rewards

ADBE
  • Adobe Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 89.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Adobe Inc. scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
ROP
  • Gross margin of 69.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 54.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 20.6x is 31% below the historical average of 29.8x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

ADBE
    ROP
    • FCF yield of 6.5% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    ROP
    Valuation
    $9.22B
    Free Cash Flow
    $2.17B
    11.88%
    FCF Yield
    6.51%
    11.16
    Trailing P/E
    20.62
    7.09
    Forward P/E
    13.86
    Quality & Moat
    37.82%
    ROIC
    5.95%
    62.95%
    ROE
    9.01%
    89.40%
    Gross Margin
    69.40%
    0.57
    PEG Ratio
    1.38
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.13
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.54
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.15
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    3.16
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    1.05%
    ADBE: 10Ties: 1ROP: 1
    ADBEROP

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ADBE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    ROP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    $-0.60
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $18.12B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-10.93B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    ROP
    $0.46
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $3.50B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.61B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    65.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 65.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $195.16
    Fair Value: $558.28
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    ROP
    21.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 21.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $330.25
    Fair Value: $421.61
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ADBE

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $195?

    -1.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -4.0%

    The market implies -1.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -4.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    ROP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $330?

    +6.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +7.7%

    The market implies +6.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    ROP
    69/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    -2.85
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    ROP
    -2.54
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 88.1%Retail & Other 11.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,191
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    ROP
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 104.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,617
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    DURN DANIEL J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $507,758
    @ $390.58 · 2025-03-20
    RICKS DAVID A
    Director
    $998,946
    @ $443.98 · 2025-01-28
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    ROP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $5.57M
    JOYCE THOMAS PATRICK JR
    Director
    $501,844
    @ $358.46 · 2026-02-06
    BRINKLEY AMY WOODS
    Director
    $540,856
    @ $450.71 · 2025-11-12
    HUNN LAURENCE NEIL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.52M
    @ $452.23 · 2025-11-12
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    2
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.05M
    FORUSZ JILLIAN
    Officer
    $185,915
    @ $246.25 · 2026-04-30
    DURN DANIEL J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $331,355
    @ $248.02 · 2026-04-20
    DURN DANIEL J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $485,323
    @ $294.85 · 2026-01-27
    FORUSZ JILLIAN
    Officer
    $50,344
    @ $337.88 · 2025-10-31
    FORUSZ JILLIAN
    Officer
    $175,828
    @ $380.58 · 2025-05-02
    FORUSZ JILLIAN
    Officer
    $145,567
    @ $435.83 · 2025-01-28
    BELSKY SCOTT K
    Officer
    $2.05M
    @ $431.61 · 2025-01-27
    BANSE AMY L
    Director
    $333,300
    @ $550.00 · 2024-12-06
    FORUSZ JILLIAN
    Officer
    $327,987
    @ $485.19 · 2024-10-29
    BELSKY SCOTT K
    Officer
    $232,525
    @ $483.42 · 2024-10-25
    BELSKY SCOTT K
    Officer
    $1.14M
    @ $511.48 · 2024-10-16
    DURN DANIEL J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.35M
    @ $515.44 · 2024-09-17
    GARFIELD MARK S.
    Officer
    $52,089
    @ $537.00 · 2024-07-25
    BELSKY SCOTT K
    Officer
    $258,297
    @ $537.00 · 2024-07-25
    GARFIELD MARK S.
    Officer
    $85,255
    @ $564.60 · 2024-07-16
    BELSKY SCOTT K
    Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $561.60 · 2024-07-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    ROP
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $17.23M
    CONLEY JASON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.67M
    @ $445.56 · 2025-12-01
    HUNN LAURENCE NEIL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $13.31M
    @ $443.57 · 2025-11-11
    JOHNSON ROBERT D.
    Director
    $210,158
    @ $525.39 · 2025-08-15
    STIPANCICH JOHN K
    General Counsel
    $846,255
    @ $564.17 · 2025-07-23
    WALLMAN RICHARD F.
    Director
    $195,800
    @ $556.25 · 2025-07-22
    WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER B
    Director
    $200,277
    @ $572.22 · 2025-05-05
    CONLEY JASON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $588.19 · 2025-02-25
    CROSS BRANDON L
    Officer
    $433,372
    @ $577.83 · 2025-02-04
    CONLEY JASON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $578.05 · 2025-01-31
    STIPANCICH JOHN K
    General Counsel
    $578,040
    @ $578.04 · 2025-01-31
    WALLMAN RICHARD F.
    Director
    $201,913
    @ $575.25 · 2025-01-31
    JOHNSON ROBERT D.
    Director
    $528,092
    @ $561.80 · 2024-12-03
    HUNN LAURENCE NEIL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $17.17M
    @ $572.47 · 2024-11-08
    WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER B
    Director
    $387,366
    @ $568.82 · 2024-11-08
    JOHNSON ROBERT D.
    Director
    $415,335
    @ $553.78 · 2024-09-13
    JOHNSON ROBERT D.
    Director
    $77,048
    @ $550.34 · 2024-07-26
    CONLEY JASON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.97M
    @ $563.02 · 2024-06-20
    WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER B
    Director
    $220,696
    @ $551.74 · 2024-06-18
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    FearGreed
    🥶Extreme Fear(17/100)

    "Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    ROP
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ADBE
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (17)
    ROP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    View ADBE Full AnalysisView ROP Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: ADBE vs ROP

    Is Adobe Inc. or Roper Technologies, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, ADBE trades at a 65.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $558 vs. price $195), compared to ROP's 21.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $422 vs. $330).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Adobe Inc. or Roper Technologies, Inc.?

    ADBE scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while ROP scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Adobe Inc. or Roper Technologies, Inc.?

    Adobe Inc. (ADBE) generates a 11.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Roper Technologies, Inc.'s 6.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Adobe Inc. or Roper Technologies, Inc.?

    ADBE earns 37.8% ROIC versus ROP's 6.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.