Compare StocksADBE vs PODD

Adobe Inc. (ADBE) vs Insulet Corporation (PODD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ADBE is undervalued at $195, with a DCF intrinsic value of $558 and a margin of safety of 65%. PODD is undervalued at $146, with an intrinsic value of $194 and a margin of safety of 25%. Of the two, ADBE has the wider margin of safety.

ADBE
Adobe Inc.
$195.16
VS
PODD
Insulet Corporation
$145.76

Rewards

ADBE
  • Adobe Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 89.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Adobe Inc. scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
PODD
  • Gross margin of 71.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.09 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Insiders have bought $0.9M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ADBE
PODD
Valuation
$9.22B
Free Cash Flow
$349.90M
11.88%
FCF Yield
3.47%
11.16
Trailing P/E
34.06
7.09
Forward P/E
18.04
Quality & Moat
37.82%
ROIC
15.86%
62.95%
ROE
23.00%
89.40%
Gross Margin
71.01%
0.57
PEG Ratio
1.30
Balance Sheet Safety
0.13
Net Debt / Equity
0.41
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.15
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.89
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
ADBE: 10Ties: 1PODD: 1
ADBEPODD

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ADBE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PODD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ADBE
$-0.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$18.12B
Δ Market Cap
$-10.93B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PODD
$-0.52
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$871.7M
Δ Market Cap
$-455.5M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ADBE
65.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 65.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $195.16
Fair Value: $558.28
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PODD
25.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 25.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $145.76
Fair Value: $194.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ADBE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $195?

-1.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -4.0%

The market implies -1.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -4.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

PODD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $146?

+18.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.4%

The market implies +18.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +13.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ADBE
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PODD
55/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ADBE
-2.85
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PODD
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ADBE
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 88.1%Retail & Other 11.7%
No. of Institutional Holders3,191
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PODD
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 105.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,170
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ADBE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
DURN DANIEL J
Chief Financial Officer
$507,758
@ $390.58 · 2025-03-20
RICKS DAVID A
Director
$998,946
@ $443.98 · 2025-01-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PODD
2
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.70M
WEATHERMAN ELIZABETH H
Director
$497,490
@ $144.20 · 2026-06-03
STONESIFER TIMOTHY C
Director
$400,393
@ $143.51 · 2026-06-03
MINOGUE MICHAEL R
Director
$499,847
@ $246.23 · 2026-02-25
STONESIFER TIMOTHY C
Director
$299,884
@ $311.73 · 2025-12-05
CHADWICK ANA MARIA
Chief Financial Officer
$20,600
@ $206.00 · 2024-08-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ADBE
2
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.05M
FORUSZ JILLIAN
Officer
$185,915
@ $246.25 · 2026-04-30
DURN DANIEL J
Chief Financial Officer
$331,355
@ $248.02 · 2026-04-20
DURN DANIEL J
Chief Financial Officer
$485,323
@ $294.85 · 2026-01-27
FORUSZ JILLIAN
Officer
$50,344
@ $337.88 · 2025-10-31
FORUSZ JILLIAN
Officer
$175,828
@ $380.58 · 2025-05-02
FORUSZ JILLIAN
Officer
$145,567
@ $435.83 · 2025-01-28
BELSKY SCOTT K
Officer
$2.05M
@ $431.61 · 2025-01-27
BANSE AMY L
Director
$333,300
@ $550.00 · 2024-12-06
FORUSZ JILLIAN
Officer
$327,987
@ $485.19 · 2024-10-29
BELSKY SCOTT K
Officer
$232,525
@ $483.42 · 2024-10-25
BELSKY SCOTT K
Officer
$1.14M
@ $511.48 · 2024-10-16
DURN DANIEL J
Chief Financial Officer
$3.35M
@ $515.44 · 2024-09-17
GARFIELD MARK S.
Officer
$52,089
@ $537.00 · 2024-07-25
BELSKY SCOTT K
Officer
$258,297
@ $537.00 · 2024-07-25
GARFIELD MARK S.
Officer
$85,255
@ $564.60 · 2024-07-16
BELSKY SCOTT K
Officer
$1.25M
@ $561.60 · 2024-07-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PODD
1
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.97M
BORIO LUCIANA
Director
$59,887
@ $143.27 · 2026-06-03
FREDERICK WAYNE A.I.
Director
$542,510
@ $293.09 · 2025-12-15
SINGH PREM
Officer
$238,726
@ $347.49 · 2025-09-08
COUSIN LAETITIA
Officer
$278,002
@ $348.81 · 2025-09-08
BENJAMIN ERIC
Officer
$1.42M
@ $332.23 · 2025-08-21
SINGH PREM
Officer
$429,760
@ $320.00 · 2025-08-07
MANEA DANIEL
Officer
$390,065
@ $300.05 · 2025-06-13
SINGH PREM
Officer
$698,216
@ $300.05 · 2025-06-13
BORIO LUCIANA
Director
$147,056
@ $305.73 · 2025-06-09
KAPPLES JOHN W.
General Counsel
$1.68M
@ $318.47 · 2025-05-14
BENJAMIN ERIC
Officer
$960,320
@ $320.00 · 2025-05-13
HOPFIELD JESSICA
Director
$1.66M
@ $317.54 · 2025-05-13
FREDERICK WAYNE A.I.
Director
$501,875
@ $275.00 · 2025-03-25
BENJAMIN ERIC
Officer
$3.47M
@ $280.00 · 2025-01-21
BENJAMIN ERIC
Officer
$1.17M
@ $267.60 · 2024-12-16
BUDDEN LAUREN
Officer
$252,192
@ $275.62 · 2024-12-10
BORIO LUCIANA
Director
$139,598
@ $274.80 · 2024-11-12
HOPFIELD JESSICA
Director
$1.72M
@ $225.26 · 2024-09-11
SCANNELL TIMOTHY J.
Director
$1.13M
@ $225.84 · 2024-09-10
BUDDEN LAUREN
Officer
$333,443
@ $221.41 · 2024-09-09
FIELD MARK N
Chief Technology Officer
$305,463
@ $220.87 · 2024-09-09
SINGH PREM
Officer
$368,940
@ $202.27 · 2024-08-30
FIELD MARK N
Chief Technology Officer
$281,561
@ $203.00 · 2024-08-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ADBE
FearGreed
🥶Extreme Fear(17/100)

"Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PODD
FearGreed
😨Fear(30/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ADBE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (17)
PODD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (30)
View ADBE Full AnalysisView PODD Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ADBE vs PODD

Is Adobe Inc. or Insulet Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ADBE trades at a 65.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $558 vs. price $195), compared to PODD's 25.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $194 vs. $146).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Adobe Inc. or Insulet Corporation?

ADBE scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while PODD scores 55/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Adobe Inc. or Insulet Corporation?

Adobe Inc. (ADBE) generates a 11.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Insulet Corporation's 3.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Adobe Inc. or Insulet Corporation?

ADBE earns 37.8% ROIC versus PODD's 15.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.